11
Intrapartum Monitoring of a Preterm
Fetus
◈
Ana Piñas Carrillo and Edwin Chandraharan
Handbook of CTG Interpretation: From Patterns to Physiology, ed. Edwin Chandraharan.
Published by Cambridge University Press. © Cambridge University Press 2017.
Key Facts
The CTG patterns reflect the development and maturity of cardiac centres in the
central nervous system and hence differ between preterm and term fetuses.
Preterm fetuses, because of immaturity and low weight, are more likely to
sustain intrapartum hypoxic injury. The physiological reserves are less than
those in a well-grown term fetus, and in the presence of hypoxia, the
compensatory response mounted by a preterm fetus is limited. The classical
features observed on a CTG trace in the case of a term fetus may not be
observed with the same amplitude in a preterm fetus. They have less capacity to
release catecholamines due to smaller adrenal glands, and mild uterine
contractions can easily cause variable decelerations due to a thinner umbilical
cord with less Wharton jelly.
The NICE guidelines, used in the UK, do not recommend intrapartum monitoring
in preterm fetuses <37 weeks. In fact, none of the guidelines used worldwideKey Features on the CTG Trace
Key Pathophysiology behind Patterns Seen on
the CTG Trace
(NICE, FIGO, ACOG) describe patterns of normality and CTG interpretation in
fetuses <37 weeks of gestational age.
Outcome between 24 and 28 weeks depends on maturity at birth and birth weight
and not on the mode of delivery. Intrapartum monitoring of these fetuses can
result on the misinterpretation of uncertain CTG patterns and unnecessary
interventions that do not improve fetal outcome.
Onset of preterm labour between 24 and 28 weeks is associated with infection in
two-thirds of the cases. This presents an alternative pathway of fetal brain
damage independent of hypoxia, and this inflammation-mediated neurological
damage may be missed by the CTG trace.
Fetal baseline heart rate is higher at an average of 155 bpm at 24 weeks, and it
decreases as pregnancy progresses, with fetuses having an average baseline
heart rate of 140 bpm at term and 120 bpm at 41–42 weeks.
The frequency and amplitude of accelerations are reduced before 30 weeks,
frequently lasting for no longer than 10 seconds and with an increase of 10 bpm
from baseline.
The variability may also be reduced due to the immaturity of autonomic nervous
system.
The presence of decelerations not related to contractions has also been
described; typically, these are variable decelerations with low depth and
duration. Up to 75 per cent of preterm fetuses may show intrapartum
decelerations.Recommended Management
The baseline heart rate is maintained by the interaction of parasympathetic and
sympathetic systems. Before 30 weeks, there is a predominance of the
sympathetic system, and this results in an average higher baseline rate in preterm
fetuses. As the parasympathetic system develops, it counteracts the activity of the
sympathetic system, and the baseline rate decreases progressively from 30
weeks of gestation.
Similarly, the baseline variability is maintained by the interaction between the
two components of the autonomic nervous system. The lack of maturity of the
parasympathetic system results in an apparent decrease in baseline variability,
which is also influenced by the presence of baseline tachycardia secondary to
unopposed sympathetic activity.
The presence of decelerations not related to uterine contractions and the higher
incidence of variable decelerations intrapartum (up to 75 per cent) in preterm
fetuses can be explained by a decreased amount of amniotic fluid, reduced
Wharton jelly in the cord and lack of maturity of the fetal myocardium and its
glycogen stores.
CTG monitoring in fetuses <28 weeks is not recommended as no patterns of
normality have been described. Monitoring these fetuses can result in
unnecessary interventions (emergency caesarean section, instrumental delivery)
that have been demonstrated not to improve the outcome of these extremely
premature babies but have the potential to increase maternal morbidity.
Beyond 32 weeks, survival rates vastly increase and hence fetal monitoring is
recommended considering the special features that these fetuses show. Caution
should be exercised between 28 and 32 weeks of gestation as no data is
available on normality of CTG traces and how long abnormal features such as
atypical or late decelerations could be allowed to persist prior to the onset of
fetal decompensation.Key Tips to Optimize Outcome
When interpreting CTG traces of fetuses between 28 and 36 + 6 weeks, it is
essential to know its specific features and fetal physiological response. This can
result in different management than when those same features are observed in a
term fetus. For example, a preterm fetus at 28 weeks of gestation presenting with
a baseline heart rate of 155 bpm in the absence of chorioamnionitis or maternal
dehydration can be regarded as normal and will not require further intervention,
whereas a fetus at 42 weeks of gestation presenting with the same baseline has to
be closely monitored as it is likely to be an early sign of chorioamnionitis or an
ongoing chronic hypoxia even in the absence of other clinical signs.
If oxytocin augmentation is needed (i.e. due to severe sepsis) on a preterm fetus,
the frequency of increase may need to be modified, as these fetuses are more
likely to rapidly develop intrapartum hypoxia due to immaturity of the fetal
compensatory response to stress.
In the presence of tachycardia or reduced baseline variability, one should
always exclude iatrogenic causes such as administration of drugs such as
tocolytics (terbutaline), pethidine, magnesium sulphate and steroids.
Fetuses 24–28 weeks of gestational age: Continuous monitoring is not
recommended. An isolated higher baseline FHR or reduced variability should
not be considered a priori as abnormal and operative interventions are not
indicated for such ‘abnormal changes’ on the CTG trace that merely reflect
physiological immaturity of the autonomic nervous system. Remember that the
physiological reserves to respond to hypoxia are not the same as in a term fetus,
especially in the presence of chorioamnionitis.
Fetuses 28–32 weeks of gestational age: Fetal monitoring may be considered as
survival and neurological outcome significantly improves during this gestation.
Fetal baseline heart rate and variability are often comparable to those of a termPitfalls
Consequences of Mismanagement
Exercises
fetus, but accelerations can still be of a smaller magnitude. Always consider the
clinical picture when interpreting the CTG trace (chorioamnionitis, drugs).
Fetuses 32–34 weeks: The CTG trace can be classified according to the
guidelines used on term fetuses. However, it is important to remember that the
reserves in these fetuses are less than at term, and hence the ability to withstand
a persistent hypoxic insult can be compromised (i.e. oxytocin augmentation).
Monitoring preterm fetuses between 24 and 28 weeks and acting on uncertain
CTG patterns, leading to unnecessary interventions such as emergency caesarean
section.
Managing and interpreting CTG traces beyond 28 weeks as in a term fetus,
unaware of the physiological reserves and the possibility of a growth-restricted
fetus that has impaired response to hypoxic stress.
Use of additional tests is not recommended for preterm fetuses. Fetal blood
sampling has not been validated in this group, and fetal ECG (ST-Analyser) is
unreliable because of changes in the myocardium composition (increased water
content and less glycogen) and a smaller epicardial–endocardial interphase.
Unnecessary operative deliveries
Delivery of an extreme premature infant due to an overreaction to CTG patterns
Stillbirth
Neonatal death1. A 24-year-old primigravida presents at 28 weeks with reduced fetal movements.
The CTG trace is shown in Figure 11.1.
Figure 11.1
a. Classify the CTG applying the ‘8Cs’ approach.
b. What are the specific features different from those of a term fetus?
c. What changes would you expect to see if you repeat the CTG in 4 weeks’ time?
d. How would you assess fetal well-being at this stage of pregnancy?
Further Reading
1. Afors K, Chandraharan E. Use of continuous electronic fetal monitoring in a preterm fetus:
clinical dilemmas and recommendations for practice. J Pregnancy. 2011; 848794.
2. National Institute of Clinical Excellence. Intrapartum care: care of healthy women and their
babies during childbirth. NICE clinical guideline CG190. December 2014.
3. Gibb D, Arulkumaran S. Fetal Monitoring in Practice. 3rd edn. Elsevier, 2008.
4. McDonnell S, Chandraharan E. The pathophysiology of CTGs and types of intrapartum
hypoxia. Curr. Women’s Health Rev. 2013; 9: 158–168.
5. Costeloe KL, Hennessy EM, Haider S, Stacey F, Marlow N, Draper ES. Short term
outcomes after extreme preterm birth in England: comparison of two birth cohorts in 1995
and 2006 (the EPICure studies). BMJ 2012; 345: e7976.
Nhận xét
Đăng nhận xét