22
ST-Analyser (STAN)
◈
Principles and Physiology
Ana Piñas Carrillo and Edwin Chandraharan
Handbook of CTG Interpretation: From Patterns to Physiology, ed. Edwin Chandraharan.
Published by Cambridge University Press. © Cambridge University Press 2017.
Key Facts
A recent systematic review of randomized controlled trials has concluded that
the use of STAN reduced the incidence of use of fetal blood sampling and
metabolic acidosis.
STAN has been shown to reduce the interobserver variation when indicating
interventions in the presence of intermediate or abnormal CTG traces.
The principle of STAN is to assess the oxygenation of a central organ (the fetal
heart). It helps to differentiate between a fetus that is exposed to hypoxic stress
but compensating well and maintaining a good oxygenation in the myocardium
from the fetus that switches to anaerobic metabolism in the myocardium and
depends on catecholamine-mediated glycogenolysis to respond to negative
energy balance in the myocardium.
The fetal ECG is monitored through a fetal scalp electrode. As soon as it is
applied, the STAN machine calculates (over 4–5 minutes) the normal T/QRS
ratio for that particular fetus and establishes it as the ‘baseline value’. From thisKey Features on the STAN
Please see Figure 22.1.
moment, the machine analyses every 30 ECG complexes (i.e. if baseline fetal
heart rate (FHR) is 150 bpm, there would be five analyses in 1 minute) and
compares them with the original ‘baseline value’. Each of them is recorded on
the CTG trace as a cross (‘X’). When the analysed ECG complexes differ
significantly from ‘baseline value’, it will be flagged up as an ‘ST event’.
In the presence of an ‘ST event’, it is necessary to classify the CTG trace
according to STAN guidelines (normal, intermediate or abnormal) first and then
to determine if the ‘ST event’ is significant and requires any action. Conversely,
if the ST event is not significant, no further action is required at this time.
There are three types of ‘ST events’: episodic T/QRS rise, baseline T/QRS rise
and biphasic events.
‘Episodic T/QRS rise’ event appears when the T/QRS ratio rises in response to
a short-lasting hypoxia for <10 minutes. The significance depends on the
magnitude of rise and classification of the CTG trace. If the CTG trace is
classified as normal, the ST event is not significant as it can be secondary to
fetal movements and resultant release of catecholamine-mediated myocardial
glycogenolysis; if the CTG trace is intermediate, a greater increase in the T/QRS
ratio is allowed before it becomes significant than if the CTG trace is classified
as abnormal.
‘Baseline T/QRS rise’ indicates a longer-lasting hypoxia (>10 minutes) with the
resultant increase in the T/QRS ratio persisting for >10 minutes. The magnitude
of rise is shown on the screen (event log), and the significance depends again on
magnitude and classification of the CTG trace.
‘Biphasic ST’ appears when there is a shift in the ST segment. There are three
degrees of biphasic ST events (grades 1–3). Repetitive grade 2 and 3 biphasic
events are significant in the presence of an intermediate or abnormal trace asFigure 22.1 STAN trace showing ST event (black box), event log (left-hand column) and
crosses (‘x’) – each ‘x’ (oval) represents 30 fetal ECG complexes.
Key Pathophysiology behind Patterns Seen on
the CTG Trace
they may reflect instability of the myocardial membrane secondary to hypoxia
and resultant changes in the morphology of ST segment of the fetal ECG
complex.
Event log indicates documentation by clinicians (e.g. vaginal examination, blood
pressure monitoring, administration of oxytocin) as well as by the computer (e.g.
type and magnitude of ST events, loss of contact).
The fetal ECG reflects the oxygenation of a central organ, the myocardium,
which is the last organ to fail when a fetus is exposed to hypoxia.
Physiology behind ‘T/QRS ST events’: The fetus releases catecholamines
(emergency hormone) that increase the FHR and also activate ‘glycogenolysis’
in the myocardium to increase the glucose available for the heart to function. The
process of ‘glycogenolysis’ results in a release of potassium ions which have
been stored within glycogen, and the resultant ‘hyperkalemia’ produces a rise in
‘T waves’ and an increase on ‘T/QRS ratio’. This phenomenon results in
‘T/QRS ST events’.Recommended Management
Physiology behind ‘biphasic ST events’: The ST segment reflects the refractory
period (isoelectric) after depolarization (myocardial contraction) and before
repolarization when there is no transfer of ions through the myocardial cells. In
the presence of a disturbance to the myocardial pump function (secondary to
hypoxia, infection, prematurity or cardiac defects), the ST segment shifts
upwards or downwards resulting on a biphasic ‘ST event’, reflecting
myocardial membrane dysfunction.
In the presence of a normal CTG trace, any ‘ST events’ can be managed with
expectant management, as they are not significant at this stage. Most commonly,
they are secondary to fetal movements that also release catecholamines.
In the presence of a preterminal trace, delivery should be expedited regardless
of the presence or absence of ‘ST events’.
In the presence of a significant ST event during the first or passive second stage
of labour, interventions to improve utero-placental oxygenation need to be
instituted. These include stopping oxytocin infusion, administration of
intravenous fluids, postural changes and/or acute tocolysis (terbutaline) to
improve fetal oxygenation. If the changes observed on the CTG improve and/or
there are no further ST events, labour can be allowed to continue. If there are
further significant ST events, CTG should be reclassified, and if the ST-events
are significant and if no further conservative measures are possible, then
immediate delivery (within 20 minutes) is indicated.
During active second stage of labour, any significant ST event should be
managed with immediate operative delivery (by the safest and quickest mode of
birth) as soon as possible unless spontaneous vaginal delivery is expected in the
following 5 to 10 minutes.
CTG changes and ST events should always be correlated with the clinical
picture (presence of meconium, chorioamnionitis, vaginal bleeding, growthKey Tips to Optimize Outcome
Common Pitfalls
restriction). Immediate delivery may be indicated in the presence of any of these
risk factors regardless of the significance of ST events.
Remember STAN can only be used in fetuses >36 weeks of gestational age as the
endocardial–epicardial interphase may be underdeveloped and interfere with
signal conduction leading to multiple ST events (most commonly biphasic ST
events). For the same reason, it cannot be used in fetuses with structural cardiac
defects.
In the presence of infection, any ST event, even in the presence of an
intermediary trace, may be regarded as significant.
If, when applying the fetal scalp electrode, repetitive ST events appear, ensure
that fetal presentation is cephalic. If the fetus is presenting by breech, ECG
complexes will be inverted and the machine interprets this as repeated biphasic
ST events due to perceived inversion of ST-segment of the fetal ECG complex
(i.e. will be recorded as a negative wave). If a decision is made to continue
labour in anticipation of an assisted vaginal breech delivery, then the STAN
machine has a ‘breech mode’ to invert the ECG complex so that biphasic events
can be stopped and the fetus can be continuously monitored using the STAN
technology.
Relying on STAN in the presence of chorioamnionitis. The STAN is a test of
hypoxia and not for infection. In the presence of an infection, there may not be
any ST events until the very final stages when the infection is affecting the
oxygenation to central organs (i.e. fetal myocardium leading to myocarditis).
Chorioamnionitis may lead to repeated biphasic ST events due to the
inflammatory damage to myocardial membrane. In this case, the CTG may notConsequences of Mismanagement
Recent Developments
show significant decelerations, and a high index of clinical suspicion of ongoing
chorioamnionitis should be exercised and labour should be managed
accordingly.
Applying the STAN in the absence of a stable baseline heart rate and a
reassuring variability. The STAN device calculates the normal ECG complex for
each fetus during the first 4–5 minutes. It is not possible to rely on STAN when it
is applied during ongoing subacute hypoxia with a loss of a stable baseline
and/or reassuring variability
Erroneous monitoring of the maternal heart rate (MHR) as FHR. When MHR is
being monitored, the P-waves would be absent on the ECG complexes as the
signal (maternal P-wave) is not powerful enough to be transmitted to the fetal
scalp electrode.
Unnecessary interventions for a normal CTG trace when ST events are flagged
up or lack of intervention on a preterminal trace in the absence of ST events.
Unnecessary interventions (operative delivery) due to nonadherence to STAN
guidelines
Stillbirth
Neonatal death
Hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy and subsequent cerebral palsy
Neonatal sepsis – when relying on STAN and ignoring signs of ongoing clinical
chorioamnionitis
A large multicentre randomized controlled trial from the United States of
America in 2015 reported that the use of STAN did not reduce operativeTherefore, in the authors’ opinion based on published systematic evidence,
compared to other adjunctive tests (i.e. pulse oximetry, fetal scalp pH and lactate),
which have been shown to have no robust scientific evidence of benefit, STAN is the
only adjunctive test which has been shown to be beneficial in 2016 (i.e. a statistically
significant reduction in metabolic acidosois, fetal blood sampling and operative vaginal
births). However, training in fetal physiology prior to introducing STAN is essential to
maximize its benefits and to minimize harm.
Further Reading
1. Chandraharan E. STAN: an introduction to its use, limitations and caveats. Obs Gyn
Midwifery Prod News. 2010. Sep 2: 18-22.
2. Neilson JP. Fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) for fetal monitoring during labour. Cochrane
Database Syst Rev. 2006;3: Art. No.: CD000116. DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD000116.pub2.
3. Amer-Wåhlin I, Hellsten C, Norén H, Hagberg H, Herbst A, Kjellmer I, Lilja H, Lindoff C,
Månsson M, Mårtensson L, Olofsson P, Sundström AK, Marál K. Cardiotocography only
versus cardiotocography plus ST analysis of fetal electrocardiogram for intrapartum fetal
monitoring: a Swedish randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2001;358:534–8.
4. Antonia C, Ayres-de-Campos D, Fernanda C, Cristina S, Joao B. Prediction of neonatal
acidemia by computer analysis of fetal heart rate and ST event signals. Am J Obstet Gynecol.
2009;201:464e1–6.
5. Westerhuis ME, van Horen E, Kwee A, van der Tweel I, Visser GH, Moons KG. Inter- and
delivery rates.7 However, the limitation of this study, including the incorrect
classification system which has been used in the study group has been
highlighted in a recent editorial.8 A recent meta-analysis of six randomized
controlled trials on STAN comprising of 26446 women, including the US Trial,
has still concluded that the use of STAN is associated with a 36% reduction in
metabolic acidosis, which was statistically significant.9 In addition, there was a
statistically significant reduction in operative vaginal delivery rate as well as
the rate of fetal scalp blood sampling.intr
a-observer agreement of intrapartum ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram in women
monitored by STAN. BJOG. 2009;116(4):545–51.
6. Olofsson P, Ayres-de-Campos D, Kessler J, Tendal B, Yli BM, Devoe L. A critical
appraisal of the evidence for using cardiotocography plus ECG ST interval analysis for fetal
surveillance in labor. Part II: the meta-analyses. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand.
2014;93(6):571–86.
7. Belfort MA, Saade GR, Thom E, Blackwell SC, Reddy UM, Thorp JM Jr, et al. A
Randomized Trial of Intrapartum Fetal ECG ST-Segment Analysis. N Engl J Med.
2015;373:632–41.
8. Bhide A, Chandraharan E, Acharya G. Fetal monitoring in labor: Implications of evidence
generated by new systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016 Jan;95(1):5–8.
9. Blix E, Brurberg KG, Reierth E, Reinar LM, Øian P. STwaveform analysis vs.
cardiotocography alone for intrapartum fetal monitoring: A systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized trials. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015;95:16–27.
Nhận xét
Đăng nhận xét