Chapter 10. Prenatal Care. Will Obs

 Chapter 10. Prenatal Care

BS. Nguyễn Hồng Anh

Te American Academy o Pediatrics and the American College o Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2017) dene prenatal care as “A comprehensive antepartum program involves a coordinated approach to medical care, continuous risk assessment, and psychosocial support that optimally begins beore pregnancy and extends throughout the postpartum and interpregnancy period.” As promulgated by John Ballantyne, such care has been a bedrock to improve pregnancy outcomes or more than 100 years (Reiss, 2000).

PRENATAL CARE IN THE UNITED STATES

Almost a century ater its introduction, prenatal care has become one o the most requently used health services in the United States. According to the Centers or Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), only 1.6 percent o women who gave birth in 2016 received no prenatal care (Osterman, 2018). Arican-American and Hispanic women have high rates o inadequate or no prenatal care that reach 10 and 7.7 percent, respectively. Tis gure is greater or adolescents, particularly those younger than 15 years compared with older age groups. Tese data highlight areas o potential improvement by the health-care system.

■ Prenatal Care Effectiveness

Care designed during the early 1900s ocused on lowering the extremely high maternal mortality rate. Prenatal care undoubtedly contributed to the dramatic decline in maternal deaths rom 690 per 100,000 births in 1920 to 50 per 100,000 by 1955 (Loudon, 1992). Data rom 1998 to 2005 rom the Pregnancy Mortality Surveillance System identied a veold increased risk or maternal death in women who received no prenatal care (Berg, 2010).

Goldenberg and McClure (2018) have emphasized the importance o prenatal care to reduce stillbirth rates as well. In a study o almost 29 million births, the risk or preterm birth, stillbirth, early and late neonatal death, and inant death rose linearly with decreasing prenatal care utilization (Partridge, 2012). Similarly, rom Parkland Hospital, Leveno and associates (2009) ound that a signicant decline in preterm births correlated closely with any use o prenatal care by medically indigent women. And in women with diabetes, adherence to prenatal care resulted in lower rates o neonatal admissions to the intensive care unit (Sperling, 2018a). Group prenatal care is acceptable and eective (American College o Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2018g). Ickovics and coworkers (2016) compared this with individual prenatal care. Group care provided traditional pregnancy surveillance in a group setting with special ocus on support, education, and active health-care participation. Women enrolled in group care had signicantly better pregnancy outcomes. Carter and colleagues (2017) cited similar results. Childbirth education classes are also reported to result in better pregnancy outcomes (Ashar, 2017). Pregnancy in adolescents carries special risk, and guidelines have been developed that ocus on this age group (Fleming, 2015).

DIAGNOSIS OF PREGNANCY

Pregnancy is usually identied when a woman presents with symptoms and possibly a positive home urine pregnancy test result. ypically, these women receive conrmatory testing o urine or blood or human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). Further, presumptive signs or diagnostic ndings o pregnancy may be ound during the clinical examination. Sonography is oten used, especially i miscarriage or ectopic pregnancy is a concern.

■ Symptoms and Signs

Amenorrhea in a healthy reproductive-aged woman who previously has experienced spontaneous, cyclical, predictable menses is highly suggestive o pregnancy. Menstrual cycles vary appreciably in length among women and even in the same woman (Chap. 5, p. 83). Tus, amenorrhea is not a reliable pregnancy indicator until 10 or more days have passed ater expected menses. Occasionally, uterine bleeding that mimics menstruation is noted ater conception. During the rst month o pregnancy, these episodes are likely the consequence o blastocyst implantation. Still, rst-trimester bleeding should prompt evaluation or an abnormal pregnancy.

O other symptoms, maternal perception o etal movement depends on actors such as parity and habitus. In general, ater a rst successul pregnancy, a woman may rst perceive etal movements between 16 and 18 weeks’ gestation. A primigravida may not appreciate etal movements until approximately 2 weeks later. At about 20 weeks, depending on maternal habitus, an examiner can begin to detect etal movements. O pregnancy signs, changes in the lower reproductive tract, uterus, and breasts develop early.

■ Pregnancy Tests

Detection o hCG in maternal blood and urine is the basis or endocrine assays o pregnancy. Syncytiotrophoblast produces hCG in amounts that increase exponentially during the rst trimester. hCG and luteinizing hormone (LH) share the same receptor in tissues. Tus, a main unction o hCG is to prevent involution o the corpus luteum, which is the principal site o progesterone ormation during the rst 6 weeks o pregnancy.

With a sensitive test, the hormone can be detected in maternal serum or urine by 8 to 9 days ater ovulation. Te doubling time o serum hCG concentration is 1.4 to 2.0 days. As shown in Figure 10-1, serum levels range widely and increase rom the day o implantation. Lower levels o hCG rise more rapidly than higher levels (Barnhart, 2016). Peak hCG levels are reached at 60 to 70 days. Tereater, the concentration declines slowly to a plateau at approximately 16 weeks’ gestation.

Measurement of hCG

Tis hormone is a glycoprotein with high carbohydrate content. Te general structure o hCG is a heterodimer composed o two dissimilar subunits, designated α and β, which are noncovalently linked. Te α-subunit is identical to those o LH, ollicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), and thyroid-stimulating hormone (SH), but the β-subunit is structurally distinct. Tus, antibodies were developed with high specicity or the hCG β-subunit. Tis specicity allows its detection, and numerous commercial immunoassays are available or measuring serum and urine hCG levels. Each immunoassay detects a slightly dierent mixture o hCG variants, its ree subunits, or its metabolites—however, all are appropriate or pregnancy testing (Braunstein, 2014). Depending on the assay used, the sensitivity or the laboratory detection limit o hCG in serum is 1.0 mIU/mL or even lower.

False-positive hCG test results are rare. A ew women have circulating serum actors that may bind erroneously with the test antibody directed to hCG in a given assay. Te most common actors are heterophilic antibodies. Tese are produced by an individual and bind to the animal-derived test antibodies used in a given immunoassay. Tus, women who have worked closely with animals are more likely to develop these antibodies, and alternative laboratory techniques are available (American College o Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2017a). Elevated hCG levels may also reect molar pregnancy and its associated neoplasms (Chap. 13, p. 238). Other rare causes o positive assays without pregnancy are (1) exogenous hCG injection used or weight loss, (2) renal ailure with impaired hCG clearance, (3) physiological pituitary hCG, and (4) hCG-producing tumors that most commonly originate rom gastrointestinal sites, ovary, bladder, or lung (McCash, 2017).

Home Pregnancy Tests

More than 60 dierent types o over-the-counter pregnancy test kits are available in the United States (Grenache, 2015). Unortunately, many o these are not as accurate as advertised (Johnson, 2015). For example, Cole and associates (2011) ound that a detection limit o 12.5 mIU/mL would be required to diagnose



FIGURE 10-1 Mean concentration (95% CI) of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) in serum of women throughout normal pregnancy.

95 percent o pregnancies at the time o missed menses. However, they reported that only one brand had this degree o sensitivity. wo other brands gave alse-positive or invalid results. In act, with an hCG concentration o 100 mIU/mL, clearly positive results were displayed by only 44 percent o brands. Accordingly, only approximately 15 percent o pregnancies could be diagnosed at the time o the missed menses. Some manuacturers o even newer home urine assays claim >99-percent accuracy or tests done on the day o—and some up to 4 days beore—the expected day o menses. Again, careul analysis suggests that these assays are oten not as sensitive as advertised.

■ Sonographic Recognition of Pregnancy

ransvaginal sonography is commonly used to accurately establish gestational age and conrm pregnancy location. A gestational sac is the rst sonographic evidence o pregnancy, and it may be seen with transvaginal sonography by 4 to 5 weeks’ gestation. It should not be conused with a pseudogestational sac.

Te latter, or pseudosac, is a uid collection within the endometrial cavity, which can occur in the setting o ectopic pregnancy (Fig. 12-3, p. 223). Further evaluation may be warranted i this is the only sonographic nding, particularly in a woman with pain or bleeding. A normal gestational sac implants eccentrically in the endometrium, whereas a pseudosac is seen in the midline o the endometrial cavity. Other potential indicators o early intrauterine pregnancy are an anechoic center surrounded by a single echogenic rim—the intradecidual sign—or two concentric echogenic rings surrounding the gestational sac—the double decidual sign (Fig. 10-2). I sonography yields equivocal ndings, the term pregnancy o unknown location (PUL) is applied (Bobdiwala, 2019). In these cases, serial serum hCG levels and transvaginal sonography can help dierentiate a normal intrauterine pregnancy rom an extrauterine pregnancy or an early miscarriage (Chap. 12, p. 222).

I the yolk sac—a brightly echogenic ring with an anechoic center—is seen within the gestational sac, an intrauterine location or the pregnancy is conrmed. Te yolk sac can normally be seen by the middle o the th week. As shown in Figure 10-2, ater 6 weeks, an embryo is seen as a linear structure immediately adjacent to the yolk sac. Cardiac motion is typically noted at this point.

INITIAL PRENATAL EVALUATION

Prenatal care is ideally initiated early. Major goals are to (1) dene the health status o the mother and etus, (2) estimate the gestational age, and (3) initiate a plan or continued obstetrical care. ypical components o the initial visit are summarized in Table 10-1. Subsequent care may range rom relatively inrequent routine visits to prompt hospitalization because o serious maternal or etal disease.

Prenatal Record

Use o a standardized record within a perinatal health-care system greatly aids antepartum and intrapartum management. Standardizing documentation allows communication and care continuity between providers and enables objective measures o care quality to be evaluated over time and across dierent clinical settings (Gregory, 2006). A prototype is provided by the American Academy o Pediatrics and the American College o Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2017) in their Guidelines or Perinatal Care, 8th edition.

Definitions

Several denitions are pertinent to establishment o an accurate prenatal record.

1. Nulligravida—a woman who currently is not pregnant and has never been pregnant.

2. Gravida—a woman who currently is pregnant or has been in the past, irrespective o the pregnancy outcome. With the establishment o the rst pregnancy, she becomes a primigravida, and with successive pregnancies, a multigravida.

3. Nullipara—a woman who has never completed a pregnancy beyond 20 weeks’ gestation. She may not have been pregnant or may have had a spontaneous or elective abortion(s) or an ectopic pregnancy.

4. Primipara—a woman who has been delivered only once o

a etus or etuses born alive or dead with an estimated gestation duration o 20 or more weeks. In the past, a 500-g birthweight threshold was used to dene parity. Tis threshold is now controversial. Namely, many states still use this weight to dierentiate a stillborn etus rom an abortus, but the survival o neonates with birthweights <500 g is no longer uncommon (Chap. 1, p. 2).

5. Multipara—a woman who has completed two or more pregnancies with gestational ages at least 20 weeks. Parity is determined by the number o pregnancies reaching 20 weeks. It is not increased to a higher number i multiples are delivered in a given pregnancy. Moreover, stillbirth does not lower this number.


FIGURE 10-2 Transvaginal sonogram of a first-trimester intrauterine pregnancy. The double decidual sign is noted surrounding the gestational sac and is defined by the decidua parietalis (white asterisk) and the decidua capsularis (yellow asterisk). The arrow notes the yolk sac, and the crown-rump length of the embryo is marked with measuring calipers. (Reproduced with permission from Dr. Elysia Moschos.)


TABLE 10-1. Typical Components of Routine Prenatal Care


In some locales, the obstetrical history is summarized by a series o digits connected by dashes. Tese reer to the number o term newborns, preterm neonates, abortuses younger than 20 weeks, and children currently alive. For example, a woman who is para 2–1–0–3 has had two term deliveries, one preterm delivery, no abortuses, and has three living children. Because these are nonconventional, it is helpul to speciy the outcome o any pregnancy that did not end normally.

Normal Pregnancy Duration

Te normal duration o pregnancy calculated rom the rst day o the last normal menstrual period is very close to 280 days or 40 weeks. A quick estimate o a pregnancy due date based on menstrual data can be made as ollows: add 7 days to the rst day o the last period and subtract 3 months. For example, i the rst day o the last menses was October 5, the due date is 10-05 minus 3 (months) plus 7 (days) = 7–12 or July 12 o the ollowing year. Tis calculation is the Naegele rule. However, menstrual cycle length varies among women and renders many o these calculations inaccurate. Tis, combined with the requent use o rst-trimester sonography, has changed the method o determining an accurate gestational age. Te American College o Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2017e), the American Institute o Ultrasound in Medicine, and the Society or Maternal-Fetal Medicine have emphasized that rst-trimester ultrasound is the most accurate method to establish or reafrm gestational age. For pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technologies, embryo age or transer date is used to assign gestational age. I available, the gestational ages calculated rom the last menstrual period and rom rst-trimester ultrasound are compared, and this estimated date o delivery is recorded. Reconciling any discordance between these two values is discussed in Chapter 14 (p. 248).

Trimesters

It has become customary to divide pregnancy into three equal epochs or trimesters o approximately 3 calendar months. More recently a “ourth trimester” has been recognized to emphasize the need or comprehensive postpartum care (American College o Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2018i). Tis is discussed in Chapter 36 (p. 634). Historically, the rst trimester extends through completion o 14 weeks, the second through 28 weeks, and the third through 42 weeks. Te ourth is the 12 weeks ater delivery. Tus, prenatally, there are three periods o 14 weeks each. Certain major obstetrical problems tend to cluster in each o these three time periods. For example, most spontaneous abortions take place during the rst trimester, whereas most women with hypertensive disorders due to pregnancy are diagnosed during the third trimester. In modern obstetrics, the clinical use o trimesters to describe a specic pregnancy is imprecise. For example, it is inappropriate in cases o uterine hemorrhage to categorize the problem temporally as “third-trimester bleeding.” Appropriate management or the mother and her etus will vary remarkably depending on whether bleeding begins early or late in the third trimester (Chap. 42, p. 733). Because precise knowledge o etal age is imperative or obstetrical management, the clinically appropriate unit is weeks o gestation completed. Clinicians designate gestational age using completed weeks and days. For example, 334/7 weeks or 33 + 4 describes pregnancy duration o 33 completed weeks and 4 days.

Previous and Current Health Status

As elsewhere in medicine, history-taking begins with queries concerning medical or surgical disorders. Detailed inormation regarding previous pregnancies is essential, as many obstetrical complications tend to recur in subsequent pregnancies. Te menstrual and contraceptive histories also are important. As noted earlier, gestational age may be less accurate or those with irregular menses. Moreover, some methods o birth control avor ectopic implantation ollowing method ailure (Chap. 38, p. 665).

Psychosocial Screening. Te American Academy o Pediatrics and the American College o Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2017) dene psychosocial issues as nonbiomedical actors that aect mental and physical well-being. Women should be screened regardless o social status, education level, race, or ethnicity. Such screening should seek barriers to care, communication obstacles, nutritional status, unstable housing, desire or pregnancy, saety concerns that include intimate-partner violence, depression, stress, and use o substances such as tobacco, alcohol, and illicit drugs. Tis screening is perormed on a regular basis, at least once per trimester, to identiy important issues and reduce adverse pregnancy outcomes. Coker and colleagues (2012) compared pregnancy outcomes in women beore and ater implementation o a universal psychosocial screening program and ound that screened women were less likely to have preterm or low-birthweight newborns, as well as other adverse outcomes. Specic screens or depression are presented in Chapter 64 (p. 1143). Cigarette Smoking. Tese data are included on the birth certi- icate, and the number o pregnant women who smoke continues to decline. From 2000 to 2010, the prevalences were 12 to 13 percent (ong, 2013). By 2016, the incidence was 7.2 percent according to the National Center or Health Statistics (Drake, 2018). Concurrent with the decline in cigarette use, there has been an increase in electronic cigarettes/vaping with a reported prevalence o 0.6 to 15 percent (Whittington, 2018). In a survey o more than 3000 mothers in Oklahoma and exas, 7 percent reported using electronic vapor products prior to conception and in the postpartum period. O these women, according to the CDC, 1.4 percent used them during the last 3 months o pregnancy (Kapaya, 2019).

According to the American Society or Reproductive Medicine (2018), smoking is associated with subertility. Higher rates o miscarriage, stillbirth, low birthweight, and preterm delivery also are linked to smoking during pregnancy (Dahlin, 2016; Luke, 2018; ong, 2013). Compared with nonsmokers, risks o placenta previa, placental abruption, and premature membrane rupture are increased twoold. Potential teratogenic eects are reviewed in Chapter 8 (p. 156). Tus, the U.S. Preventive Services ask Force recommends that clinicians oer counseling and eective intervention options to pregnant smokers at the rst and subsequent prenatal visits (Siu, 2015). Although benets are greatest i smoking ceases early in pregnancy or preerably preconceptionally, quitting at any stage o pregnancy can improve perinatal outcomes (Soneji, 2019). Compared with simple counseling to quit, person-to-person psychosocial interventions are signicantly more successul in achieving smoking abstinence in pregnancy (Fiore, 2008). One example is a brie counseling session covering the “5As” o smoking cessation (Table 10-2). Tis approach can be accomplished in 15 minutes or less and is eective when initiated by health-care providers (American College o Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2020b).

Behavioral interventions and nicotine replacement products are successul in reducing smoking rates (Patnode, 2015). However, nicotine replacement has not been sufciently evaluated to determine its eectiveness and saety in pregnancy. rials evaluating such therapy have yielded conicting evidence (Coleman, 2015; Spindel, 2016). wo randomized trials also produced inconclusive results. In the Smoking and Nicotine in Pregnancy (SNAP) trial, Cooper and associates (2014) reported that a temporary cessation o smoking may have been associated with improved inant development. In the Study o Nicotine Patch in Pregnancy (SNIPP) trial, no dierences in smoking cessation rates or birthweights were ound (Berlin, 2014). Similar preliminary results were reported or sustained-release bupropion (Nanovskaya, 2017). Olson and colleagues (2019) reported that nancial incentives were helpul to encourage smoking cessation.

Because o limited available evidence to support pharmacotherapy or smoking cessation in pregnancy, the American College o Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2020b) recommends that i nicotine replacement therapy is used, it should be done with close supervision and ater careul consideration o the risks o smoking versus nicotine replacement.

Alcohol. Ethyl alcohol or ethanol is a potent teratogen that causes the etal alcohol spectrum disorders. Fetal alcohol syndrome, the most severe orm o these disorders, is characterized by growth restriction, acial abnormalities, and central nervous system dysunction. Te estimated prevalence o these disorders is 11 to 50 per 1000 (May, 2018).

As discussed in Chapter 8 (p. 150), women who are pregnant or considering pregnancy should abstain rom drinking any alcoholic beverages (Sarman, 2018). Te CDC analyzed data rom the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System rom 2015 to 2017 and estimated that 12 percent o pregnant women used alcohol (Denny, 2019). Te American College o Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2021a) in collaboration with the CDC has developed the Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders (FASD) Prevention Program, which provides resources or providers and is available at www.acog.org/alcohol. 

Illicit Drugs. An estimated 10 percent o etuses are exposed to one or more illicit drugs. Agents may include heroin and other opiates, cocaine, amphetamines, barbiturates, and marijuana (American Academy o Pediatrics, 2017). As discussed in Chapter 8 (p. 157), chronic use o large quantities is harmul to the etus (Metz, 2015). Well-documented sequelae include etal-growth restriction, low birthweight, and drug withdrawal soon ater birth. Adverse eects o marijuana are less convincing. Women who use such drugs requently do not seek prenatal care, which in itsel is associated with risks or preterm and low-birthweight neonates (Eriksen, 2016).

For women who abuse heroin, methadone maintenance can be initiated within a registered methadone treatment program to reduce complications o illicit opioid use and narcotic withdrawal, to encourage prenatal care, and to avoid drug culture risks (American College o Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2017g). Available programs can be ound through the treatment locator o the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration at www.samhsa.gov. Methadone dosages usually are initiated at 10 to 30 mg orally daily and titrated as needed. In some women, careul methadone taper may be an appropriate option (Stewart, 2013). Buprenorphine alone or in combination with naloxone also may be oered and managed by physicians with specic credentialing. Tese therapeutic options are considered in greater detail in Chapter 64 (p. 1150).

Intimate-Partner Violence. Tis term reers to a pattern o assault and coercive behavior that may include physical injury, psychological abuse, sexual assault, progressive isolation, stalking, deprivation, intimidation, and reproductive coercion (Miller, 2019). Such violence is recognized as a major public health problem. Unortunately, most abused women continue to be victimized during pregnancy. With the possible exception o preeclampsia, intimate-partner violence (IPV) is more prevalent than any major medical condition detectable through routine prenatal screening (American Academy o Pediatrics, 2017). Te estimated prevalence during pregnancy lies between 4 and 8 percent. IPV is associated with an increased risk o several adverse perinatal outcomes that include preterm delivery, etal-growth restriction, and perinatal death (Chap. 50, p. 891).

Te American College o Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2019c) has provided methods or IPV screening and recommends their use at the rst prenatal visit, again at least once per trimester, and again at the postpartum visit. Such screening should be done privately and away rom amily members and riends. Patient sel-administered or computerized screenings appear to be as eective or disclosure as clinician-directed interviews (Ahmad, 2009; Chen, 2007). Physicians should be amiliar with state laws that may require reporting o IPV. Coordination with social services can be invaluable in these cases. Te National Domestic Violence Hotline (1–800–799- SAFE [7233]) is a nonprot telephone reerral service that provides individualized inormation regarding city-specic shelter locations, counseling resources, and legal advocacy.

■ Clinical Evaluation

Torough, general physical and pelvic examinations should be completed at the initial prenatal encounter. Te cervix is visualized using a speculum lubricated with warm water or water-based lubricant gel. Bluish-red passive hyperemia o the cervix is characteristic, but not diagnostic, o pregnancy. Dilated, occluded cervical glands bulging beneath the ectocervical mucosa—nabothian cysts—may be prominent. Te cervix is not normally dilated except at the external os. o identiy cytological abnormalities, a Pap test is perormed according to current guidelines noted in Chapter 66 (p. 1164). Specimens or identication o Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae are obtained when indicated (p. 181). Bimanual examination is completed by palpation. Special attention is given to the consistency, length, and dilation o the



TABLE 10-2. Five A’s of Smoking Cessation ASK about smoking at the first and subsequent prenatal visits. 

ADVISE with clear, strong statements that explain the risks of continued smoking to the woman, fetus, and newborn.

ASSESS the patient’s willingness to attempt cessation.

ASSIST with pregnancy-specific, self-help smoking cessation materials. Offer a direct referral to the smokers’ quit line (1-800-QUIT NOW) to provide ongoing counseling and support.

ARRANGE to track smoking abstinence progress at subsequent visits.

Adapted from American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2020b; Fiore, 2008.

cervix; to uterine and adnexal size; to the bony pelvic architecture; and to any vaginal or perineal anomalies. Oten, later in pregnancy, etal presentation also can be determined. Lesions o the cervix, vagina, or vulva are urther evaluated as needed by colposcopy, biopsy, or culture. Te perianal region is inspected, and digital rectal examination is perormed as required or complaints o rectal pain, bleeding, or mass.

Gestational Age Assessment

Precise knowledge o gestational age is essential or prenatal care, because several pregnancy complications may develop and optimal treatment will depend on etal age. Menstrual history is best conrmed by rst-trimester sonography (Chap. 14, p. 248). Tat said, gestational age can also be estimated with considerable precision by a careully perormed clinical uterine size examination that is coupled with last menstrual period dating.

Uterine size similar to a small orange roughly correlates with a 6-week gestation; a large orange, with an 8-week pregnancy; and a graperuit, with one at 12 weeks (Margulies, 2001).

■ Laboratory Tests

Recommended routine tests at the rst prenatal encounter are listed in able 10-1. Initial blood tests include a complete blood count, a determination o blood type and Rh status, and an antibody screen. Te Institute o Medicine recommends universal human immunodeciency virus (HIV) testing as a routine part o prenatal care. Tis testing is explained to the patient, who may decline. Te American College o Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2018j) continues to support this practice. I a woman declines, this is recorded in the prenatal record. All pregnant women are screened also or hepatitis B virus inection, syphilis, and immunity to rubella at the initial visit.

Based on their prospective investigation o 1000 women, Murray and coworkers (2002) concluded that in the absence o hypertension, routine urinalysis beyond the rst prenatal visit was unnecessary. A urine culture is recommended by most, because treating bacteriuria signicantly reduces the likelihood o developing symptomatic urinary tract inections in pregnancy (Chap. 56, p. 996).

Cervical Infections

C trachomatis is isolated rom the cervix in 2 to 13 percent o pregnant women. Te American Academy o Pediatrics and the American College o Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2017) recommend that all women be screened or chlamydia during the rst prenatal visit, with additional third-trimester testing or those at increased risk. Risk actors include unmarried status, recent change in sexual partner or multiple concurrent partners, age younger than 25 years, inner-city residence, history or presence o other sexually transmitted diseases, and little or no prenatal care. For those testing positive, treatment described in Chapter 68 (p. 1212) is ollowed by a second testing—a test o cure—3 to 4 weeks ater treatment completion.

N gonorrhoeae typically causes cervicitis or urethritis in pregnancy. Inrequently, it may also cause septic arthritis (Bleich, 2012). Risk actors or gonorrhea are similar to those or chlamydial inection. Te American Academy o Pediatrics and the American College o Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2017) recommend that pregnant women with risk actors or those living in an area o high N gonorrhoeae prevalence be screened at the initial prenatal visit and again in the third trimester. reatment is given or gonorrhea and simultaneously or possible coexisting chlamydial inection (Chap. 68, p. 1211). est o cure is recommended ollowing treatment.

■ Pregnancy Risk Assessment

Many actors can adversely aect maternal and etal well-being. Some are evident at conception, but many become apparent during the course o pregnancy. Te designation o “high-risk pregnancy” is overly vague or an individual woman and is best avoided i a more specic diagnosis can be assigned. Some common risk actors or which consultation is recommended by the American Academy o Pediatrics and the American College o Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2017) are shown in

Table 10-3. Some conditions may require the involvement o a maternal-etal medicine specialist, geneticist, neonatologist, anesthesiologist, cardiologist, or other specialist.

SUBSEQUENT PRENATAL VISITS

Tese are traditionally scheduled at 4-week intervals until 28 weeks, then every 2 weeks until 36 weeks, and weekly thereater. Women with complicated pregnancies—or example, with twins or diabetes—oten require return visits at 1- to 2-week intervals (Power, 2013). In 1986, the Department o Health and Human Services convened an expert panel to review the content o prenatal care. Tis report was subsequently reevaluated and revised in 2005 (Gregory, 2006). Te panel recommended, among other things, early and continuing risk assessment that is patient specic. It also endorsed exibility in clinical visit spacing; health promotion and education, including preconceptional care; medical and psychosocial interventions; standardized documentation; and expanded prenatal care objectives that include amily health up to 1 year ater birth.

Te World Health Organization conducted a multicenter randomized trial with almost 25,000 women that compared routine prenatal care with an experimental model designed to minimize visits (Villar, 2001). In the new model, women were seen once in the rst trimester and screened or certain risks. Tose without anticipated complications—80 percent o those screened—were seen again at 26, 32, and 38 weeks. Compared with routine prenatal care, which required a median o eight visits, the new model required a median o only ve. No disadvantages were attributed to the regimen with ewer visits, and these ndings are consistent with other randomized trials.

■ Prenatal Surveillance

At each return visit, the well-being o mother and etus are assessed (see able 10-1). Fetal heart rate, growth, and activity are evaluated. Maternal blood pressure and weight and their extent o change are assessed. Symptoms such as abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting, bleeding, vaginal uid leakage, headache, altered vision, and dysuria are sought. Ater 20 weeks’ gestation, uterine examination measures size rom the symphysis to the undus with a traditional tape measure. In late pregnancy, vaginal examination oten provides valuable inormation. Tis may include conrmation o the presenting part and its station, clinical estimation o pelvic capacity and conguration, etal ballottement as a reection o sufcient amnionic uid volume, and cervical consistency, eacement, and dilation (Chap. 22, p. 426).

Fundal Height

Between 20 and 34 weeks’ gestation, the height o the uterine undus measured in centimeters correlates closely with gestational age in weeks. Tis measurement is used to monitor etal growth and amnionic uid volume. It is measured along the abdominal wall rom the top o the symphysis pubis to the top o the undus. Importantly, the bladder must be emptied beore undal measurement. Obesity or the presence o uterine masses such as leiomyomas also may limit undal height measurement accuracy. Moreover, using undal height alone, etal-growth restriction may be undiagnosed in up to a third o cases (American College o Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2021b; Haragan, 2015).

Fetal Heart Sounds

Instruments incorporating Doppler ultrasound are usually used to easily detect etal heart action, and in the absence o maternal obesity, heart sounds are almost always detectable by 10 weeks with such instruments (Chap. 24, p. 447). Te etal heart rate ranges rom 110 to 160 beats per minute and is typically heard as a double sound. Using a standard nonamplied stethoscope, the etal heart is audible by 20 weeks in 80 percent o women, and by 22 weeks, heart sounds are expected to be heard in all (Herbert, 1987). Because the etus moves reely in amnionic uid, the site on the maternal abdomen where etal heart sounds can be heard best will vary.

Additionally, with ultrasonic auscultation, one may hear the unic soue, which is a sharp, whistling sound that is synchronous with the etal pulse. It is caused by the rush o blood through the umbilical arteries and may not be heard consistently. In contrast, the uterine soue is a sot, blowing sound that is synchronous with the maternal pulse. It is produced by the passage o blood through the dilated uterine vessels and is heard most distinctly near the lower portion o the uterus.

Sonography

Ultrasound imaging provides invaluable inormation regarding etal anatomy, growth, and well-being. As such, it is recommended that all pregnant women be oered at least one prenatal sonographic examination (American College o Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2018l). Continuing trends suggest that the number o these examinations perormed per pregnancy is increasing. Data rom commercial insurance plans indicate that even low-risk pregnancies receive an average o 4 to 5 ultrasound examinations (O’Keee, 2013). Sonography should be perormed only or valid medical indications. Additionally, needed inormation is obtained using the lowest possible ultrasound exposure settings, which is the as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) principle (American Institute o Ultrasound in Medicine, 2016).

■ Subsequent Laboratory Tests

I initial results were normal, most tests need not be repeated. Hematocrit or hemoglobin determination, along with serology


 TABLE 10-3. Conditions for Which Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consultation May Be Beneficial


Genetic Screening

Serum screening or etal aneuploidy is routinely oered to all pregnant women—in the rst trimester at 10 to 14 weeks, in the second trimester at 15 to 20 weeks, or as cell-ree DNA screening at any point ater 10 weeks (American College o Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2020d). Additionally, the College recommends that both cystic brosis carrier screening and screening or spinal muscular atrophy should be oered to all women considering pregnancy or who are currently pregnant, provided that carrier or disease status is not already known (American College o Obstetricians and Gynecologist, 2017b).

Historically, carrier screening or selected genetic abnormalities was oered only to women at increased risk based on ethnic or racial background. One example is screening or ay-Sachs disease in those o Ashkenazi Jewish descent. However, given our increasingly diverse, multiethnic society, previous assumptions about carrier risk may no longer apply. Although ethnicityspecic carrier screening remains an option, providers should also consider panethnic and expanded carrier screening strategies (American College o Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2017c). Tese are discussed urther in Chapter 17 (p. 342). All genetic screening is optional, and ideally, genetic carrier screening and counseling should be perormed beore pregnancy.

Neural-Tube Defects

raditionally, screening or neural-tube deects has been per- ormed as part o second-trimester aneuploidy screening. An elevation o maternal serum alpha-etoprotein (MSAFP) levels then prompted additional evaluation with ultrasound and/or amniocentesis. With the advent o other screening modalities or aneuploidy, second-trimester MSAFP testing is less requently obtained. For example, the expansion o second-trimester etal anatomical surveillance has been used to screen and identiy neural-tube deects (American College o Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2017).

NUTRITIONAL COUNSELING

■ Weight Gain Recommendations

In 2009, the Institute o Medicine and National Research Council revised guidelines or weight gain in pregnancy and continued to stratiy suggested weight gain ranges based on prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) (Table 10-4). Te same recommendations apply to women in all age, race, and ethnic groups. Te American College o Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2018n) endorses these measures. When the initial Institute o Medicine guidelines were ormulated, concern ocused on low-birthweight newborns. However, current emphasis is directed to the obesity epidemic. Te specic and relatively narrow range o recommended weight gains or obese women emphasizes the renewed interest in lower weight gains during pregnancy. Obesity is associated with signicantly greater risks or gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, macrosomia, cesarean delivery, and other complications (Chap. 51, p. 905). Te risk appears proportionate to prenatal weight gain. In a Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network cohort o more than 29,000 pregnant women, 51 percent had weight gain above and 21 percent below the guidelines



TABLE 10-4. Recommendations for Total and Rate of Weight Gain During Pregnancy


(Kominiarek, 2018). Tose with excessive weight gain had higher rates o hypertension and cesarean delivery. Tis risk is even greater in chronically hypertensive women (Ornaghi, 2018). Conversely, among 100,000 women with normal prepregnancy BMI, DeVader and colleagues (2007) ound that those who gained <25 lb during pregnancy had a lower risk or preeclampsia, ailed induction, cephalopelvic disproportion, cesarean delivery, and large-or-gestational age neonates. Tis cohort, however, had an increased risk or small-or-gestational age newborns.

■ Severe Undernutrition

Meaningul studies o nutrition in human pregnancy are exceedingly difcult to design because experimental dietary deciency is not ethical. In those instances in which severe nutritional deciencies have been induced as a consequence o social, economic, or political disaster, coincidental events have oten created many variables, the eects o which are not amenable to quantication. Some past experiences suggest, however, that in otherwise healthy women, a state o near starvation is required to establish clear dierences in pregnancy outcome. Tese are discussed in Chapter 47 (p. 827).

■ Weight Retention After Pregnancy

Not all the weight gained during pregnancy is lost during and immediately ater delivery. Schauberger and coworkers (1992) studied prenatal and postpartum weights in 795 women. Teir average weight gain was 28.6 lb or 12.9 kg. As shown in Figure 10-3, most maternal weight loss was at delivery— approximately 12 lb or 5.4 kg—and in the ensuing 2 weeks— approximately 9 lb or 4 kg. An additional 5.5 lb or 2.5 kg was lost between 2 weeks and 6 months postpartum. Tus, average retained pregnancy weight was 2.1 lb or 1 kg. Excessive weight gain is maniest by accrual o at and may be partially retained as long-term at (Berggren, 2016; Widen, 2015). Overall, the more weight that was gained during pregnancy, the more that was lost postpartum. And breasteeding duration is inversely related to weight retention (Jiang, 2018).

■ Dietary Reference Intakes—Recommended

Allowances

Periodically, the Institute o Medicine (2006, 2011) publishes recommended dietary allowances, including those or pregnant or lactating women. Some o its latest recommendations are summarized in Table 10-5. Certain prenatal vitamin–mineral supplements may lead to intakes well in excess o the recommended allowances. Moreover, the use o excessive supplements, which oten are sel-prescribed, has led to concern regarding nutrient toxicities during pregnancy. Tose with potentially toxic efects include iron, zinc, selenium, and vitamins A, B6, C, and D.

■ Calories

As shown in Figure 10-4, pregnancy requires an additional 80,000 kcal, mostly during the last 20 weeks. o meet this demand, a caloric increase o 100 to 300 kcal/d is recommended


FIGURE 10-3 Cumulative weight loss from last antepartum visit to 6 months postpartum. On average, 1 kg will be retained after pregnancy. *Significantly different from 2-week weight loss;

**Significantly different from 6-week weight loss. (Redrawn with permission from Schauberger CW, Rooney BL, Brimer LM: Factors that influence weight loss in the puerperium. Obstet Gynecol 79:424, 1992.)



TABLE 10-5. Recommended Daily Dietary Allowances for Pregnant and Lactating Women


during pregnancy (American Academy o Pediatrics and American College o Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2017). Tis greater intake, however, should not be divided equally during the course o pregnancy. Te Institute o Medicine (2006) recommends adding 0, 340, and 452 kcal/d to the estimated nonpregnant energy requirements in the rst, second, and third trimesters, respectively. Te addition o 1000 kcal/d or more results in at accrual (Jebeile, 2015).

Whenever caloric intake is inadequate, protein is metabolized rather than being spared or its vital role in etal growth and development. otal physiological requirements during pregnancy are not necessarily the sum o ordinary nonpregnant requirements plus those specic to pregnancy. For example, the additional energy required during pregnancy may be compensated in whole or in part by reduced physical activity (Hytten, 1991).

■ Protein

Protein requirements rise to meet the demands or growth and remodeling o the etus, placenta, uterus, and breasts, and or the expanded maternal blood volume (Chap. 4, p. 51). During the second hal o pregnancy, approximately 1000 g o protein are deposited, amounting to 5 to 6 g/d (Hytten, 1971). o accomplish this, protein intake that approximates 1 g/kg/d is recommended (see able 10-5). Data suggest this should be doubled in late gestation (Stephens, 2015). Most amino-acid levels in maternal plasma all markedly, including ornithine, glycine, taurine, and proline (Hytten, 1991). Exceptions during pregnancy are glutamic acid and alanine, the concentrations o which rise. Preerably, most protein is supplied rom animal sources, such as meat, milk, eggs, cheese, poultry, and sh. Tese urnish amino acids in optimal combinations. Milk and dairy products are considered nearly ideal sources o nutrients, especially protein and calcium, or pregnant or lactating women. Ingestion o specic sh and potential methylmercury toxicity are discussed later (p. 188).

■ Minerals

Te intakes recommended by the Institute o Medicine (2006) or various minerals are listed in able 10-5. With the exception o iron and iodine, practically all diets that supply sufcient calories or appropriate weight gain will contain enough minerals to prevent deciency. Iron requirements substantively rise during pregnancy, and reasons or this are discussed in Chapter 4 (p. 60). O the approximately 300 mg o iron transerred to the etus and placenta and the 500 mg incorporated into the expanding maternal hemoglobin mass, nearly all is used ater midpregnancy. During that time, iron requirements imposed by pregnancy and maternal excretion total approximately 7 mg/d (Pritchard, 1970). Few women have sufcient iron stores or dietary intake to supply this amount. Tus, the American Academy o Pediatrics and the American College o Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2017) endorse the recommendation by the National Academy o Sciences that at least 27 mg o elemental iron be supplemented daily to pregnant women. Tis amount is contained in most prenatal vitamins. As little as 30 mg o elemental iron, supplied as errous gluconate, sulate, or umarate, and taken daily throughout the latter hal o pregnancy, provides sufcient iron to meet pregnancy requirements and protect preexisting iron stores (Scott, 1970). Tis amount will also provide or iron requirements o lactation. Notably, in iron preparations, the number o milligrams o compound is ollowed by the milligrams o elemental iron, which is enclosed by parentheses. Te pregnant woman may benet rom 60 to 100 mg o elemental iron per day i she is obese, has a multietal gestation, begins supplementation late in pregnancy, takes iron irregularly, or has a depressed hemoglobin level. Te woman who is overtly anemic rom iron de- ciency responds well to oral supplementation with iron salts. In response, serum erritin levels rise more than the hemoglobin concentration (Daru, 2016).

Iodine also is needed, and the recommended iodine allowance is 220 µg/d (see able 10-5). Te use o iodized salt and bread products is recommended during pregnancy to oset the increased etal requirements and maternal renal losses o iodine. Despite this, iodine intake has declined substantially in the past 15 years, and in some areas it is probably inadequate (Caldwell, 2013; Chittimoju, 2019). Severe maternal iodine deciency predisposes ospring to endemic cretinism, which is characterized by multiple severe neurological deects. In parts o China and Arica, where this condition is common, iodide supplementation very early in pregnancy prevents some cretinism cases (Cao, 1994). o obviate this, most prenatal supplements now contain various quantities o iodine (Patel, 2019).

Calcium is retained by the pregnant woman during gestation and approximates 30 g. Most o this is deposited in the etus late in pregnancy (Pitkin, 1985). Tis amount o calcium represents only approximately 2.5 percent o total maternal calcium, most o which is in bone and can readily be mobilized or etal growth. As another potential use, routine calcium supplementation to prevent preeclampsia is ineective (Chap. 40, p. 704).

Zinc deciency i severe may lead to poor appetite, suboptimal growth, and impaired wound healing. During pregnancy, the recommended daily intake approximates 12 mg. But, the sae level o zinc supplementation or pregnant women is not clearly established. Vegetarians have lower zinc intakes (Foster, 2015). Te bulk o studies support zinc supplementation only



FIGURE 10-4 Cumulative kilocalories required for pregnancy. (Redrawn with permission from Chamberlain G, Broughton-Pipkin F [eds]: Clinical Physiology in Obstetrics, 3rd ed. Oxford, Blackwell Science, 1998.)

in zinc-decient women in poor-resource countries (Nossier, 2015; Ota, 2015).

Magnesium deciency as a consequence o pregnancy has not been recognized. Undoubtedly, during prolonged illness with no magnesium intake, the plasma level might become critically low, as it would in the absence o pregnancy. We have observed this deciency during pregnancies in some with previous intestinal bypass surgery. Instead, as a preventive agent, Sibai and colleagues (1989) randomly assigned 400 normotensive primigravidas to receive 365-mg elemental magnesium supplementation or placebo tablets rom 13 to 24 weeks’ gestation. Supplementation did not improve any measures o pregnancy outcome. race metals include copper, selenium, chromium, and manganese, which all have important roles in certain enzyme unctions. In general, most are provided by an average diet.

Selenium deciency is maniested by a requently atal cardiomyopathy in young children and reproductive-aged women. Conversely, selenium toxicity resulting rom oversupplementation also has been observed. Selenium supplementation is not needed in American women. 

Potassium concentrations in maternal plasma decline by approximately 0.5 mEq/L by midpregnancy (Brown, 1986). Potassium deciency develops in the same circumstances as in nonpregnant individuals. One common example in pregnant women is hyperemesis gravidarum.

Fluoride metabolism is not altered appreciably during pregnancy (Maheshwari, 1983). Horowitz and Heietz (1967) concluded that no additional ospring benets accrued rom maternal ingestion o uoridated water i the newborn ingested such water rom birth. Sa Roriz Fonteles and associates (2005) studied microdrill biopsies o deciduous teeth and concluded that antenatal uoride provided no additional uoride uptake compared with postnatal uoride alone. Finally, supplemental uoride ingested by lactating women does not raise the uoride concentration in breast milk (Ekstrand, 1981).

■ Vitamins

Te increased requirements or most vitamins during pregnancy shown in able 10-5 usually are supplied by any general diet that provides adequate calories and protein. Te exception is olic acid during times o unusual requirements, such as pregnancy complicated by protracted vomiting, hemolytic anemia, or multiple etuses. Tat said, in impoverished countries, routine multivitamin supplementation reduced the incidence o low-birthweight and growth-restricted etuses but did not alter preterm delivery or perinatal mortality rates (Fawzi, 2007).

Folic acid supplementation in early pregnancy can lower neural-tube deect risks (Chap. 15, p. 276). For example, the CDC (2004) estimated that the number o aected pregnancies had decreased rom 4000 per year to approximately 3000 per year ater mandatory ortication o cereal products with olic acid in 1998. Perhaps more than hal o all neural-tube deects can be prevented with daily intake o 400 µg o olic acid throughout the periconceptional period (Centers or Disease Control and Prevention, 2019a). Evidence also suggests that olate insu- ciency has a global eect on brain development (Ars, 2016). Putting 140 µg o olic acid into each 100 g o grain products may increase the olic acid intake o the average American woman o childbearing age by 100 µg/d. Because nutritional sources alone are insufcient, however, olic acid supplementation is still recommended.

A woman with a prior child with a neural-tube deect can reduce the 2- to 5-percent recurrence risk by more than 70 percent with a daily 4-mg olic acid supplement taken during the month beore conception and during the rst trimester. As emphasized by the American Academy o Pediatrics and the American College o Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2017), this dose should be consumed as a separate supplement and not as multivitamin tablets. Tis practice avoids excessive intake o at-soluble vitamins.

Vitamin A, although essential, has been associated with congenital malormations when taken during pregnancy in high doses (>10,000 IU/d). Tese malormations are similar to those produced by the vitamin A derivative isotretinoin (Accutane), which is a potent teratogen (Chap. 8, p. 155). Beta- carotene, the precursor o vitamin A ound in ruits and vegetables, does not produce vitamin A toxicity. Most prenatal vitamins contain vitamin A in doses considerably below the teratogenic threshold. Dietary intake o vitamin A in the United States appears to be adequate, and additional supplementation is not routinely recommended. In contrast, vitamin A deciency is an endemic nutritional problem in the developing world (McCauley, 2015). Vitamin A deciency, whether overt or subclinical, is associated with night blindness and with an increased risk o maternal anemia and spontaneous preterm birth (West, 2003).

Vitamin B12 plasma levels drop in normal pregnancy, mostly as a result o reduced plasma levels o their carrier proteins— transcobalamins. Vitamin B12 occurs naturally only in oods o animal origin, and strict vegetarians may give birth to neonates whose B12 stores are low. Likewise, because breast milk o a vegetarian mother contains little vitamin B12, the deciency may become proound in the breasted inant (Higginbottom, 1978). Excessive ingestion o vitamin C also can lead to a unctional deciency o vitamin B12. Although its role is still controversial, vitamin B12 deciency may be an independent actor associated with neural-tube deects (Molloy, 2018).

Vitamin B6, which is pyridoxine, does not require supplementation in most gravidas (Salam, 2015). For women at high risk or inadequate nutrition, a daily 2-mg supplement is recommended. As discussed on page 191, vitamin B6, when combined with the antihistamine doxylamine, is helpul in many cases o nausea and vomiting o pregnancy.

Vitamin C allowances during pregnancy are 80 to 85 mg/d— approximately 20 percent more than when nonpregnant (see able 10-5). A reasonable diet should readily provide this amount, and supplementation is unnecessary (Rumbold, 2015). Maternal plasma levels decline during pregnancy, whereas cord blood levels are higher. Tis is a phenomenon observed with most water-soluble vitamins.

Vitamin D is a at-soluble vitamin. Ater being metabolized to its active orm, it boosts the efciency o intestinal calcium absorption and promotes bone mineralization and growth. Unlike most vitamins that are obtained exclusively rom dietary intake, vitamin D is also synthesized endogenously with exposure to sunlight. Vitamin D deciency is common during pregnancy. Tis is especially true in high-risk groups such as women with limited sun exposure, vegetarians, and ethnic minorities—particularly those with darker skin (Bodnar, 2007). Maternal deciency can cause disordered skeletal homeostasis, congenital rickets, and ractures in the newborn (American College o Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2017j). However, vitamin D supplementation in women with asthma may decrease the likelihood o childhood asthma in their ospring (Litonjua, 2016). Te Food and Nutrition Board o the Institute o Medicine (2011) established that an adequate intake o vitamin D during pregnancy and lactation was 15 µg/d (600 IU/d). In women suspected o having vitamin D deciency, serum levels o 25-hydroxyvitamin D can be obtained. Even then, the optimal levels in pregnancy have not been established (De-Regil, 2016).

■ Pragmatic Nutritional Surveillance

Although researchers continue to study the ideal nutritional regimen or the pregnant woman and her etus, basic tenets or the clinician include:

1. Advise the pregnant woman to eat ood types she wants in reasonable amounts and salted to taste.

2. Ensure that ood is amply available or socioeconomically deprived women.

3. Monitor weight gain and align goals with the Institute o Medicine recommendations.

4. Explore ood intake by dietary recall periodically to discover the occasional nutritionally errant diet.

5. Give tablets o simple iron salts that provide at least 30 mg o elemental iron daily. Give olate supplementation beore and in the early weeks o pregnancy. Provide iodine supplementation in areas o known dietary insufciency.

6. Recheck the hematocrit or hemoglobin concentration at 28 to 32 weeks’ gestation to detect signicant anemia.

COMMON CONCERNS

■ Employment

More than hal o the children in the United States are born to working mothers. Several ederal laws have been passed to protect pregnant workers. Tese prohibit employers rom excluding women rom job categories on the basis that they are or might become pregnant. Te Family and Medical Leave Act o 1993 requires that covered employers must grant up to 12 work weeks o unpaid leave to an employee or the birth and care o a newborn child.

In the absence o complications, most women can continue to work until labor onset (American Academy o Pediatrics and American College o Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2017). Some types o work, however, may increase pregnancy complication risks. According to the American College o Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2018b), risks o preterm birth are slightly to modestly increased with standing or walking at work >3 hours daily, liting and carrying >5 kg, or physically exerting onesel at work. In a prospective study o more than 900 healthy nulliparas, women who worked had a veold higher risk o preeclampsia (Higgins, 2002). Tus, any occupation that subjects the gravida to severe physical strain should be avoided. Ideally, no work or play is continued to the extent that undue atigue develops. Adequate periods o rest should be provided.

■ Exercise

In general, pregnant women do not need to limit exercise, provided they do not become excessively atigued or risk injury (Davenport, 2016). Clapp and associates (2000) reported that both placental size and birthweight were signicantly greater in women who exercised. Duncombe and coworkers (2006) reported similar ndings in 148 women. In contrast, Magann and colleagues (2002) prospectively analyzed exercise behavior in 750 healthy women and ound that working women who exercised had smaller neonates and more dysunctional labors. Te American College o Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2020a) advises a thorough clinical evaluation beore recommending an exercise program. In the absence o contraindications listed in Table 10-6, pregnant women are encouraged to engage in regular, moderate-intensity physical activity or at least 150 minutes each week. Such activity has been shown to not adversely alter uterine artery Doppler studies (Szymanski, 2018). Each activity should be reviewed individually or its potential risk. Examples o sae activities are walking, running, swimming, stationary cycling, and low-impact aerobics. However, they should rerain rom activities with a high risk o alling or abdominal trauma. Similarly, scuba diving is avoided because the etus is at increased risk or decompression sickness (Reid, 2018).

In the setting o certain pregnancy complications, it is wise to abstain rom exercise and even limit physical activity. Some women with pregnancy-associated hypertensive disorders, preterm labor, placenta previa, or severe cardiac or pulmonary disease may accrue advantages rom being sedentary. Also, those with multiple or suspected growth-restricted etuses may be served by greater rest.



TABLE 10-6. Some Contraindications to Exercise During Pregnancy

Significant cardiovascular or pulmonary disease: chest pain, calf pain or swelling

Significant risk for preterm labor: cerclage, multifetal gestation, significant bleeding, threatened preterm labor, ruptured membranes

Obstetrical complications: preeclampsia, placenta previa, anemia, poorly controlled diabetes or epilepsy, morbid obesity, fetal-growth restriction

Summarized from American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2017g; The American Academy of Pediatrics, 2017.

■ Seafood Consumption

Fish are an excellent source o protein, are low in saturated ats, and contain omega-3 atty acids. It is recommended that pregnant women ingest 8 to 12 ounces o sh weekly, but no more than 6 ounces o albacore or “white” tuna (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2019). Because nearly all sh and shell- sh contain trace amounts o mercury, pregnant and lactating women are advised to avoid specic types o sh with potentially high methylmercury levels. Tese include shark, swordsh, king mackerel, and tile sh. I the mercury content o locally caught sh is unknown, overall sh consumption should be limited to 6 ounces per week. Finally, to help avert listeriosis, eating raw or undercooked sh is avoided (American College o Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2017j).

■ Lead Screening

Maternal lead exposure is associated with several adverse maternal and etal outcomes across a range o maternal blood lead levels (aylor, 2015). Tese include gestational hypertension, miscarriage, low birthweight, and neurodevelopmental impairments in exposed pregnancies. Te levels at which these risks rise remains unclear. However, recognizing that such exposure remains a signicant health issue or reproductive-aged women, the CDC (2010a) provides guidance or screening and managing exposed pregnant and lactating women. Tese guidelines, which have been endorsed by the American College o Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2018), recommend blood lead testing only i a risk actor is identied. I the levels are >5 µg/dL, the lead source is sought and removed. Subsequent blood levels are obtained. Blood lead levels >45 µg/dL are consistent with lead poisoning, and women in this group may be candidates or chelation therapy. Aected pregnancies are best managed in consultation with lead poisoning treatment experts. National and state resources are available at the CDC website: www.cdc.gov/nceh/lead/.

■ Automobile and Air Travel

Pregnant women are encouraged to wear properly positioned three-point restraints as protection against automobile accident injury (Chap. 50, p. 892). Te lap portion o the restraining belt is placed under the abdomen and across her upper thighs. Te belt should be comortably snug. Te shoulder belt also is rmly positioned between the breasts. Airbags should not be disabled or the pregnant woman.

In general, air travel in a properly pressurized aircrat has no harmul eect on pregnancy. Tus, in the absence o obstetrical or medical complications, the American College o Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2018a) has concluded that pregnant women can saely y up to 36 weeks’ gestation. It is recommended that they observe the same precautions or air travel as the general population. Seatbelts are used while seated. Support stockings, periodic lower extremity movement, and at least hourly ambulation help lower the venous thromboembolism threat. Signicant risks with travel, especially international travel, are inectious disease acquisition and development o complications remote rom adequate health-care resources.

■ Coitus

In healthy pregnant women, sexual intercourse usually is not harmul. Whenever miscarriage, placenta previa, or preterm labor threatens, however, coitus is avoided. Nearly 10,000 women enrolled in a prospective investigation by the Vaginal Inection and Prematurity Study Group were interviewed regarding sexual activity (Read, 1993). Tey reported a decreased requency o coitus with advancing gestation. By 36 weeks, 72 percent had intercourse less than once weekly. Te decline is attributed to lower desire and ear o harming the pregnancy (Staruch, 2016).

Intercourse specically late in pregnancy is not harmul. Sayle and colleagues (2001) reported no increased—and actually a decreased—risk o delivery within 2 weeks o intercourse. an and associates (2007) studied women scheduled or nonurgent labor induction and ound that spontaneous labor ensued at equal rates in groups either participating in or abstaining rom intercourse.

Oral-vaginal intercourse is occasionally hazardous. Aronson and Nelson (1967) described a atal air embolism late in pregnancy as a result o air blown into the vagina during cunnilingus. Other near-atal cases have been described (Bernhardt, 1988).

■ Dental Care

Examination o the teeth is included in the prenatal examination, and good dental hygiene is encouraged. Indeed, periodontal disease is linked to preterm labor. Unortunately, although its treatment improves dental health, it does not prevent preterm birth (Daalderop, 2018). Dental caries are not aggravated by pregnancy. Importantly, pregnancy is not a contraindication to dental treatment including dental radiographs (American Academy o Pediatrics and American College o Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2017).

■ Immunization

Current recommendations or immunization during pregnancy are summarized in Table 10-7. Well-publicized concerns regarding a causal link between childhood exposure to the thimerosal preservative in some vaccines and neuropsychological disorders have led some parents to vaccine prohibition. Although controversy continues, these associations have been proven groundless. Tus, many vaccines may be used in pregnancy (Munoz, 2019). Te American College o Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2020c) stresses the importance o integrating an eective vaccine strategy into the care o both obstetrical and gynecological patients. Te College urther emphasizes that inormation on the saety o vaccines given during pregnancy is subject to change, and recommendations can be ound on the CDC website at www.cdc.gov/vaccines.

Inuenza and tetanus–diphtheria–acellular pertussis (dap) vaccinations are recommended routinely or all pregnant women (Munoz, 2019; Sperling, 2018b). Others are recommended or specic indications (see able 10-7). Women who are susceptible to rubella should receive measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccination postpartum. Tis vaccine is contraindicated during pregnancy.


TABLE 10-7. Recommendations for Immunization During Pregnancy and Postpartum



■ Caffeine

Whether adverse pregnancy outcomes are related to caeine consumption is somewhat controversial. As summarized rom Chapter 11 (p. 200), heavy intake o coee each day—approximately ve cups or 500 mg o caeine—slightly raises the miscarriage risk. Studies o “moderate” intake—less than 200 mg daily—did not nd a higher risk. It is unclear i caeine consumption is associated with preterm birth or impaired etal growth. Clausson and coworkers (2002) ound no association between caeine consumption <500 mg/d and low birthweight, etal-growth restriction, or preterm delivery. Bech and associates (2007) randomly assigned more than 1200 pregnant women who drank at least three cups o coee per day to caeinated versus decaeinated coee. Tey ound no dierence in birthweight or gestational age at delivery between groups. Te CARE Study Group (2008), however, evaluated 2635 low-risk pregnancies and reported a 1.4-old risk or etal-growth restriction among those whose daily ca- eine consumption was >200 mg/d compared with those who consumed <100 mg/d. Te American College o Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2018g) concludes that moderate consumption o caeine—less than 200 mg/d—does not appear to be associated with miscarriage or preterm birth, but that the relationship between caeine consumption and etal-growth restriction remains unsettled.

■ Nausea and Heartburn

Nausea and vomiting are common complaints during the rst hal o pregnancy. Tese vary in severity and usually commence between the rst and second missed menstrual period and continue until 14 to 16 weeks’ gestation. Although nausea and vomiting tend to be worse in the morning—thus termed morning sickness—both symptoms requently continue throughout the day. Lacroix and associates (2000) ound that nausea and vomiting were reported by three ourths o pregnant women and lasted an average o 35 days. Hal had relie by 14 weeks’ gestation, and 90 percent by 22 weeks’ gestation. In 80 percent o these women, nausea lasted all day. reatment o pregnancy-associated nausea and vomiting seldom provides complete relie, but symptoms can be minimized. Eating small meals at requent intervals is valuable. One systematic literature search reported that the herbal remedy ginger was likely eective (Borrelli, 2005). Mild symptoms usually respondto vitamin B6 given with doxylamine, but some women require phenothiazine or H1-receptor blocking antiemetics (American College o Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2018h). In some with hyperemesis gravidarum, vomiting is so severe that dehydration, electrolyte and acid-base disturbances, and starvation ketosis become serious problems (Chap. 57, p. 1014).

Heartburn is another common complaint o gravidas and is caused by gastric content reux into the lower esophagus. Te greater requency o regurgitation during pregnancy most likely results rom upward displacement and compression o the stomach by the uterus, combined with relaxation o the lower esophageal sphincter. Avoiding bending over or lying at can be preventive. In most pregnant women, symptoms are mild and relieved by a regimen o more requent but smaller meals. Antacids may provide considerable relie (Phupong, 2015).

Specically, aluminum hydroxide, magnesium trisilicate, or magnesium hydroxide are given alone or in combination. Management o heartburn or nausea that does not respond to simple measures is discussed in Chapter 57 (p. 1017).

■ Pica and Ptyalism

Te craving or strange oods is termed pica. Worldwide, its prevalence among pregnant women is estimated to be 30 percent (Fawcett, 2016). At times, nonoods such as ice (pagophagia), starch (amylophagia), or clay (geophagia) may predominate.

Tis desire is considered by some to be triggered by severe iron deciency (Epler, 2017). Although such cravings usually abate ater deciency correction, not all pregnant women with pica are iron decient. Indeed, i strange “oods” dominate the diet, iron deciency will be aggravated or will develop eventually. Patel and colleagues (2004) prospectively completed a dietary inventory on more than 3000 women during the second trimester. Te prevalence o pica was 4 percent. Te most common nonood items ingested were starch in 64 percent, dirt in 14 percent, sourdough in 9 percent, and ice in 5 percent.

Women during pregnancy are occasionally distressed by prouse salivation—ptyalism. Although usually unexplained, ptyalism sometimes appears to ollow salivary gland stimulation by the ingestion o starch. It commonly occurs with hyperemesis gravidarum (Bronshtein, 2018).

■ Headache or Backache

Headaches are common in pregnancy. At least 5 percent o pregnancies are estimated to be complicated by new-onset or new-type headache (Spierings, 2016). Acetaminophen is suitable or treatment o most, and an in-depth discussion is ound in Chapter 63 (p. 1127).

Low back pain to some extent is reported by nearly 70 percent o gravidas (Liddle, 2015). Minor degrees ollow excessive strain or signicant bending, liting, or walking. It can be reduced by squatting rather than bending when reaching down, by using a back-support pillow when sitting, and by avoiding high-heeled shoes. Back pain complaints increase with progressing gestation and are more prevalent in obese women and those with a history o low back pain. In some cases, troublesome pain may persist or years ater the pregnancy (Norén, 2002). Severe back pain should not be attributed simply to pregnancy until a thorough orthopedic examination has been conducted. Severe pain has other uncommon causes that include pregnancyassociated osteoporosis, disc disease, vertebral osteoarthritis, or septic arthritis (Smith, 2008). More commonly, muscular spasm and tenderness are classied clinically as acute strain or brositis.

Although evidence-based clinical research directing care in pregnancy is limited, low back pain usually responds well to analgesics, heat, and rest. Acetaminophen may be used as needed. Nonsteroidal antiinammatory drugs also may be benecial but are used only in short courses to avoid etal eects (Chap. 8, p. 151). Muscle relaxants that include cyclobenzaprine or bacloen may be added when needed. Once acute pain is improved, stabilizing and strengthening exercises provided by physical therapy help improve spine and hip stability, which is essential or the increased load o pregnancy. For some, a support belt that stabilizes the sacroiliac joint may be helpul (Gutke, 2015).

■ Varicosities and Hemorrhoids

Venous leg varicosities have a congenital predisposition and accrue with advancing age. Tey can be aggravated by actors that raise lower-extremity venous pressures, such as an enlarging uterus. Femoral venous pressures in the supine gravida rise rom 8 mm Hg in early pregnancy to 24 mm Hg at term. Tus, leg varicosities typically worsen as pregnancy advances, especially with prolonged standing. Symptoms vary rom cosmetic blemishes and mild discomort at the end o the day to severe discom- ort that requires prolonged rest with eet elevation. reatment is generally limited to periodic rest with leg elevation, elastic stockings, or both. Surgical correction during pregnancy generally is not advised, although rarely the symptoms may be so severe that injection, ligation, or even stripping o the veins is necessary.

Supercial varicosities are a risk actor or deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism (Chap. 55, p. 980). Vulvar varicosities requently coexist with leg varicosities, but they may appear without other venous pathology. Uncommonly, they become massive and almost incapacitating (Pratilas, 2018). I these large varicosities rupture, either spontaneously or at the time o delivery, blood loss can be severe. reatment is with specially tted pantyhose that will also minimize lower extremity varicosities. With particularly bothersome vulvar varicosities, a oam rubber pad suspended across the vulva by a belt can be used to exert pressure on the dilated veins.

Hemorrhoids are rectal vein varicosities and may rst appear during pregnancy as pelvic venous pressures rise. Commonly, they are recurrences o previously encountered hemorrhoids. Up to 40 percent o pregnant women develop these (Poskus, 2014). Pain and swelling usually are relieved by topically applied anesthetics, warm soaks, and stool-sotening agents. With thrombosis o an external hemorrhoid, pain can be considerable. Tis may be relieved by incision and removal o the clot ollowing injection o a local anesthetic.

■ Sleeping and Fatigue

Beginning early in pregnancy, many women experience atigue and need greater amounts o sleep. Te soporic eect o progesterone contributes but may be compounded in the rst trimester by nausea and vomiting. In the latter stages, general discomorts, urinary requency, and dyspnea can be additive.

Sleep-disordered breathing may be associated with signicant morbidities such as hypertensive disorders o pregnancy, stillbirth, and preterm delivery (Brown, 2018; Dominguez, 2018). Moreover, sleep efciency appears to progressively diminish as pregnancy advances. Wilson and associates (2011) perormed overnight polysomnography and observed that women in the third trimester had poorer sleep efciency, more awakenings, and less o both stage 4 (deep) and rapid-eye-movement sleep. Women in the rst trimester also were aected, but to a lesser extent. Daytime naps and mild sedatives at bedtime such as diphenhydramine (Benadryl) can be helpul.

■ Cord Blood Banking

Cord blood contains hemopoietic stem cells that can be used to treat more than 70 types o diseases. Tese include immunological and genetic diseases and some orms o cancer. O the two cord blood bank types, public banks promote allogeneic donation, or use by a related or unrelated recipient, similar to blood product donation. Private banks store stem cells or uture autologous use and charge ees or initial processing and annual storage. Te American College o Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2020e) has concluded that i a woman requests data on umbilical cord banking, inormation regarding advantages and disadvantages o public versus private banking should be explained. Some states have passed laws that require physicians to inorm patients about cord blood banking options. Importantly, ew transplants have been perormed by using cord blood stored in the absence o a known indication in the recipient (Screnci, 2016). Te likelihood that cord blood would be used or the child or amily member o the donor couple is considered remote. Instead, it is recommended that directed donation be considered when an immediate amily member carries the diagnosis o a specic condition known to be treatable by hemopoietic transplantation

Nhận xét