Chapter 40. Preeclampsia Syndrome. Will Obs.

 Preeclampsia Syndrome

BS. Nguyễn Hồng Anh

Hypertensive disorders include preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, and chronic hypertension and complicate up to 10 percent of pregnancies. As a group, they are one member of the ealy trial—along with hemorrhage and infection—that contributes greatly to maternal morbidity (July, 2019).

Preeclampsia, either alone or superimpose on chronic hypertension, is the most angerous. In the United States from 2011 to 2015, 7 percent o pregnancy-relate maternal eaths were cause by preeclampsia or eclampsia (Petersen, 2019). Most hypertension-relate eaths are eeme preventable (Katsuragi, 2019). In response, Joint Commission (2019) accreite hospitals are now require to track their recognition an timely treatment o hypertension.

In 2018, a workshop to stuy preeclampsia was convene by the National Heart, Lung, an Bloo Institute. Tis buils on the prior work o the American College o Obstetricians an Gynecologists’ ask Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy (2013). Its purpose was to review topics regaring all aspects o preeclampsia an to recommen uture research areas. Many o these topics are iscusse throughout this chapter an Chapter 41.

TERMINOLOGY AND DIAGNOSIS

o coiy the classication o hypertensive isorers o pregnancy, the American College o Obstetricians an Gynecologists (2013, 2020) escribes our types o hypertensive isease:

1. Preeclampsia an eclampsia synrome

2. Chronic hypertension o any etiology

3. Preeclampsia superimpose on chronic hypertension

4. Gestational hypertension, in which enitive evience or the preeclampsia synrome oes not evelop an hypertension resolves by 12 weeks postpartum.

This classification aims to diferentiate preeclampsia syndrome, which is potentially more ominous, from other hypertensive disorders.

■ Diagnosis of Hypertensive Disorders

Hypertension is diagnosed empirically when systolic and diastolic blood pressures exceed 140 mm Hg and 90 mm Hg, respectively. Korotko phase V is use to ene iastolic pressure.

Previously or pregnant women, increases o 30 mm Hg systolic or 15 mm Hg iastolic above bloo pressure values taken at mipregnancy ha also been use as iagnostic criteria, even when absolute values were <140/90 mm Hg.

These incremental changes are no longer use to ene hypertension. However, bloo pressure surveillance in these gravias is reasonable because eclamptic seizures evelop in some whose bloo pressures have staye below 140/90 mm Hg (Alexaner, 2006).

In other cases, mean arterial pressures that suenly rise but that still lie in normal range—“elta hypertension”— may signiy preeclampsia (Maconal-Wallis, 2012; Zeeman, 2007). We use this term to escribe a relatively acute rise in bloo pressure in iniviual patients, albeit some still with pressures <140/90 mm Hg (Fig. 40-1). Some o these women will go on to have obvious preeclampsia, an some even evelop eclamptic seizures or hemolysis, elevate liver enzyme levels, an low platelet count (HELLP) synrome.

Historically, systolic an iastolic bloo pressure levels o 140/90 mm Hg have been arbitrarily use since the 1950s to ene “hypertension” in nonpregnant iniviuals. However, these levels were selecte by insurance companies to characterize a population o mile-age men. It seems more realistic to ene normal-range bloo pressures or specic populations— such as young, healthy, pregnant women (Lu, 2019; Rey, 2020). o provie such ata, >1000 women were recently stuie longituinally through pregnancy (Green, 2020). Data o this type may shape uture threshols.

■ Gestational Hypertension

Women with gestational hypertension have bloo pressures that reach 140/90 mm Hg or greater or the rst time ater mipregnancy but lack proteinuria. Almost hal o aecte women subsequently evelop preeclampsia (Jim, 2017). Even so, when bloo pressure rises appreciably, it is angerous to both mother an etus to ignore this elevation only because proteinuria has not yet evelope (Fishel Bartal, 2020). As

Chesley (1985) emphasize, 10 percent o eclamptic seizures evelop beore overt proteinuria can be etecte. Gestational hypertension is reclassie by some as transient hypertension i preeclampsia oes not evelop an bloo pressure returns to normal by 12 weeks postpartum.

■ Preeclampsia Syndrome

Preeclampsia is best described as a pregnancy-specic syndrome that can aect virtually every organ system. Although preeclampsia is more than simply gestational hypertension with proteinuria, the appearance o protein remains a primary iagnostic criterion. It is an objective marker an reects the system-wie enothelial leak that characterizes the preeclampsia synrome.

Last, preeclampsia can be ivie into early onset, <34 weeks; late onset, ≥34 weeks; preterm onset, <37 weeks; an term onset, ≥37 weeks (Burton, 2019; Poon, 2019). In some women with preeclampsia, neither overt proteinuria nor etal-growth restriction are eatures (Sibai, 2009).

Because o this, the ask Force (2013) suggests other iagnostic criteria, some o which are shown in Table 40-1. Multiorgan involvement may be reecte by thrombocytopenia, renal ys- unction, hepatocellular necrosis, central nervous system perturbations, or pulmonary eema.

Te markers liste in able 40-1 help also to classiy preeclampsia synrome severity. Although many use a ichotomous “mil” an “severe” classication, the ask Force (2013) iscourages the use o “mil preeclampsia.” It is problematic that there are criteria or the iagnosis o “severe” preeclampsia, but the binary eault classication is either implie or specically terme “mil,” “less severe,” or “nonsevere” (Alexaner, 2003; Linheimer, 2008). No consensus criteria ene “moerate” preeclampsia, which is an elusive thir category.

We use the criteria recommene by the American College o Obstetricians an Gynecologists (2020), some o which are liste in Table 40-2 an categorize isease as “severe” versus “nonsevere.”

Some symptoms are consiere ominous. Headaches or visual disturbances can precee eclampsia, which is a convulsion in a woman with preeclampsia that is not attributable to another cause. Te seizures are generalize an may appear beore, uring, or ater labor. Te proportion that evelops seizures later—ater 48 hours postpartum—approximates 10 percent (Sibai, 2005; Zwart, 2008). Another symptom, epigastric or right upper quadrant pain, requently accompanies hepatocellular necrosis, ischemia, an hepatic eema. Elevate serum hepatic transaminase levels can be one marker.

Last, thrombocytopenia also signies worsening preeclampsia. It represents platelet activation an aggregation an microangiopathic hemolysis. Other actors inicative o severe preeclampsia inclue renal or cariac involvement. When these signs an symptoms are prooun, they likely cannot be temporize, an elivery will more likely be require.

Importantly, ierentiating nonsevere an severe gestational hypertension or preeclampsia can be misleaing because what might be apparently mil isease may progress rapily to severe isease.

■ Preeclampsia Superimposed on Chronic

Hypertension

Any chronic hypertensive isorer preisposes a woman to evelop superimpose preeclampsia synrome. Chronic unerlying hypertension is iagnose in women with ocumente bloo pressures ≥140/90 mm Hg beore pregnancy or beore 20 weeks’ gestation, or both. Tus, in women who are not rst seen until ater mipregnancy, hypertensive isorers can be icult to classiy. For example, a woman with previously uniagnose chronic vascular isease who is seen beore 20 weeks requently has bloo pressures within normal range. During the thir trimester, however, as bloo pressures return to their originally hypertensive levels, it may be i- cult to etermine whether hypertension is chronic or inuce by pregnancy. Even a careul search or evience o preexisting en-organ amage may be utile, as many o these women have mil isease an no evience o ventricular hypertrophy, retinal vascular changes, or renal involvement.

In 20 to 50 percent o women with chronic hypertension, bloo pressure rises to obviously abnormal levels, typically ater 24 weeks’ gestation. I new-onset or worsening baseline hypertension is accompanie by new-onset proteinuria or other nings liste in able 40-1, superimpose preeclampsia is iagnose (American College o Obstetricians an Gynecologists, 2019a). Compare with “pure” preeclampsia, superimpose preeclampsia commonly evelops earlier in pregnancy. It tens to be more severe an more oten is accompanie by etalgrowth restriction. Te same criteria shown in able 40-2 also urther characterize the severity o superimpose preeclampsia.

INCIDENCE AND RISK FACTORS

Preeclampsia is ientie in 5 to 8 percent o all pregnancies (Jim, 2017; Poon, 2019). Young an nulliparous women are particularly vulnerable, whereas oler women are at greater risk or chronic hypertension with superimpose preeclampsia (Sheen, 2020). In one review o global stuies, the incience o preeclampsia in nulliparas range rom 3 to 10 percent (Sta, 2015). In multiparas, the incience ranges rom 2 to 5 percent (Jim, 2017; Poon, 2019).

Te incience o preeclampsia is also inuence by race, ethnicity, an genetic preisposition. In one stuy by the Maternal–Fetal Meicine Units (MFMU) Network, the incience o preeclampsia was 5 percent in white, 9 percent in Hispanic, an 11 percent in Arican American nulliparas (Myatt, 2012a,b). In aition, black women carry higher risk or associate severe averse outcomes (Gyam-Bannerman, 2020).

For several clinical actors, Bartsch an associates (2016) extracte ata rom more than 25 million pregnancies an calculate relative risks (Table 40-3). Major risks inclue oler age, nulliparity, obesity, iabetes, an chronic hypertension. Another is preeclampsia an especially HELLP synrome in a prior pregnancy (Malström, 2020). Unerlying metabolic syn- rome, hyperhomocysteinemia, or chronic kiney isease are others (Masouian, 2016; Wiles, 2020).

O lesser actors, human immunoeciency virus (HIV) seropositivity, sleep-isorere breathing, an a male etus pose a slightly higher risk (Facco, 2017; Jaskolka, 2017; Sansone, 2016). Previously aecte amily members are another, an maternal an etal genetics are assuming greater preictive importance (Burton, 2019; Gray, 2018; Phipps, 2019). Last, preeclampsia requently complicates the “mirror synrome” (Chap. 18, p. 364) (ra, 2021). Although smoking uring pregnancy causes various averse pregnancy outcomes, ironically, it lowers the risk or hypertension uring pregnancy.

For eclampsia, seizure incience has ecline in areas where health care is more reaily available. In countries with aequate resources, the incience averages 1 case in 2000 to 3000 eliveries (Jaatinen, 2016; O’Connor, 2013; Schaap, 2019). At Parklan Hospital, the incience has ecline appreciably uring the past ecae an approximates 1 case in 2000 births (Fig. 40-2).

Tis requency may be relate to improve access to prenatal care an our active management approach (Chap. 41, p. 717).

ETIOPATHOGENESIS

Te mechanisms by which pregnancy incites or aggravates hypertension remain unsolve. Any satisactory theory concerning the origins o preeclampsia must account or the observation that gestational hypertensive isorers are more likely to evelop in women with the ollowing characteristics:

• Exposure to chorionic villi for the rst time

• Exposure to a superabundance of chorionic villi, as with twins or hyatiiorm mole

• Preexisting conditions associated with endothelial cell activation or inammation

• Genetic predisposition to hypertension developing during pregnancy.

A etus is not a requisite or preeclampsia to evelop. Although chorionic villi are essential, they nee not be intrauterine. For example, preeclampsia can evelop with an avance abominal pregnancy (Worley, 2008). Regarless o precipitating etiology, the cascae o promoting events leas to systemic vascular enothelial amage, vasospasm, plasma transuation, an ischemic an thrombotic sequelae.

■ Phenotypic Expression

Tis varies wiely or preeclampsia, an phenotype is aecte by the egree o remoeling o uterine spiral arterioles by enovascular trophoblasts. Tis process unerlies the “twostage isorer” theory o preeclampsia pathogenesis. Accor-

ing to Reman an coworkers (2015), stage I—the placental

synrome—is cause by aulty enovascular trophoblastic

remoeling that ownstream causes stage II—the maternal

synrome. Importantly, stage II can be moie by maternal conitions that also maniest enothelial cell activation

or inammation. Tese inclue chronic hypertension, renal

isease, obesity, immunological or connective tissue isorers,

an iabetes.

Such staging is articial, an preeclampsia synrome presents a spectrum o isease (Burton, 2019). Moreover, “iso-

orms” likely exist an are iscusse subsequently. Dierences

inclue maternal an etal characteristics, placental nings,

genetic actors, an early- versus late-onset isease (Gray, 2018;

Phipps, 2019; Poon, 2019).

■ Etiology

O suggeste mechanisms to explain the cause o preeclampsia,

primary ones inclue:

• Placental implantation with abnormal trophoblastic invasion

o uterine vessels

• Dysfunctional immunological tolerance between maternal,

paternal (placental), an etal tissues

 Maternal maladaptation to cardiovascular or inammatory

changes o normal pregnancy

• Genetic factors that include predisposing genes and epigenetic inuences.

■ Stage I—Placental Syndrome

Normal placental implantation, as iscusse in Chapter 5 (p.

90), is characterize by extensive remoeling o the spiral arterioles within the eciua basalis (Fig. 40-3). In this “placental

be,” enovascular trophoblasts replace the vascular enothelial an muscular linings. Tis avantageously enlarges arteriole

iameter (Brosens, 2019). Veins are invae only supercially.

In some preeclampsia cases, but not all, trophoblastic invasion

may be incomplete. With this, eciual vessels, but not myometrial vessels, become line with enovascular trophoblasts.

Te eeper myometrial arterioles thus o not lose their enothelial lining an musculoelastic tissue. As a result, their mean

external iameter is only hal that o corresponing vessels in

normal placentas (Fisher, 2015). Tis mechanism is more prevalent in women with early-onset preeclampsia (Khozhaeva,

2016). Evience suggests a critical role or soluble antiangiogenic growth actors in this aulty enovascular remoeling

(McMahon, 2014).

From placental electron microscopy stuies, early preeclamptic changes inclue enothelial amage, insuation o plasma

constituents into vessel walls, myointimal cell prolieration, an

meial necrosis (De Wol, 1980). Hertig (1945) reerre to lipi

accumulation in myointimal cells an macrophages as atherosis. Tese nings are more common in placentas rom women

iagnose with preeclampsia beore 34 weeks’ gestation (Nelson, 2014). Acute placental vascular atherosis may also ientiy a

group o women at greater risk or atherosclerosis an cariovascular isease later in lie (Sta, 2015) (Chap. 41, p. 726). In pregnancy, abnormally narrow spiral arteriole lumens likely impair

placental bloo ow, reuce perusion, an create a hypoxic

environment (Burton, 2019).

At this point, these changes incite a systemic inammatory

response, which is stage II or the maternal synrome. Deective

placentation is posite to urther preispose aecte women

to gestational hypertension, preeclampsia synrome, preterm

elivery, etal growth-restriction, an placental abruption (Brosens, 2019; Labarrere, 2017; Nelson, 2014).

Immunological Factors

Maternal immune tolerance to paternally erive placental an

etal antigens is iscusse in Chapter 5 (p. 85). Loss o this tolerance is another cite theory or preeclampsia (Erlebacher, 2013).

Certainly, histological changes at the maternal–placental inter-

ace in those with preeclampsia suggest acute grat rejection.

olerance ysregulation might also explain the elevate risk

when the paternal antigenic loa is increase. One example is

complete molar pregnancies, which have iploi complement

o chromosomes solely rom the ather. Tose with later-stage

moles, have a high incience o early-onset preeclampsia.

Women with a trisomy 13 etus also have a 30- to 40-percent

incience o preeclampsia. Te gene or one preeclampsia-linke

actor, soluble ms-like tyrosine kinase 1, is on chromosome 13

(Bolah, 2006). Tese women have elevate serum levels o

antiangiogenic actors, which can aect the placenta (p. 694).

Last, women previously expose to paternal antigens, such as

a prior pregnancy with the same partner, may be “immunize”

against preeclampsia. Conversely, multiparas impregnate by a

new partner have a greater risk o preeclampsia (Mostello, 2002).

Burton an colleagues (2019) reviewe the possible role

o immune malaaptation in preeclampsia pathophysiology.

In women estine to have preeclampsia, extravillous trophoblasts early in pregnancy express reuce amounts o immunosuppressive nonclassic human leukocyte antigen G (HLA-G).

Black women more commonly have the 1597∆C gene allele,

which is associate with incomplete HLA-G expression an

may preispose to preeclampsia (Loisel, 2013). Tis immune

malaaptation may contribute to the eective placental vascularization seen with preeclampsia.

As iscusse in Chapter 4 (p. 61), -helper (T) lymphocytes uring normal pregnancy are prouce so that type 2

activity is increase in relation to type 1. Tis is the so-calle

type 2 bias (Phipps, 2019; Reman, 2015). T2 cells promote

humoral immunity, whereas T1 cells stimulate inammatory

cytokine secretion (Ma, 2019). Beginning in the early secon

trimester in women who evelop preeclampsia, T1 action is

increase.

Genetic Factors

Preeclampsia appears to be a multiactorial, polygenic isorer.

In one stuy o almost 1.2 million Sweish births, a genetic

association was oun or gestational hypertension an or preeclampsia (Nilsson, 2004). War an aylor (2015) cite an

incient risk or preeclampsia o 20 to 40 percent or aughters

o preeclamptic mothers; 11 to 37 percent or sisters o preeclamptic women; an 22 to 47 percent or twins. Ethnoracial

actors are important an evience by the high incience o

preeclampsia in Arican American women. Latina women have

a lower incience because o interactions o American Inian

an white race genes (Shahabi, 2013).

Te hereitary preisposition or preeclampsia likely stems

rom interactions o literally hunres o inherite genes—both

maternal an paternal—that control many enzymatic an metabolic unctions throughout every organ system (Burton, 2019;

riche, 2014). Plasma-erive actors may inuce some o these

genes in preeclampsia (Leseva, 2020; Mackenzie, 2012). Tus, the

clinical maniestation in any given woman with the preeclampsia synrome will reect a spectrum. In this regar, phenotypic

expression will ier among similar genotypes epening on

interactions with environmental components (Yang, 2013).

Hunres o genes have been stuie or their possible association with preeclampsia (Buurma, 2013; Sakowicz, 2016;

War, 2015). However, because o the complex phenotypic

expression o preeclampsia, it is oubtul that any one cani-

ate gene will be oun responsible. Last, a preeclampsia pre-

isposition has also been linke to genes o the etus (Burton,

2019; Gray, 2018; Leseva, 2020).

■ Stage II—Maternal Syndrome

Endothelial Cell Activation

Inammatory changes are believe to be a continuation o the

placental synrome. In response to ischemia or other inciting causes, placental actors are release an initiate a series

o events (Burton, 2019; Davige, 2015). Tus, antiangiogenic an metabolic actors an other inammatory leukocyte

meiators are thought to provoke the systemic endotheliopathy,

which is use synonymously here with endothelial cell activation or dysunction. Injury to systemic enothelial cells is seen

as a centerpiece o preeclampsia pathogenesis (Burton, 2019;

Phipps, 2019).

Cellular ysunction may result rom an extreme activate

state o leukocytes in the maternal circulation (Gervasi, 2001).

Briey, cytokines such as tumor necrosis actor α (NF-α) an

the interleukins may contribute to the systemic oxiative stress

associate with preeclampsia. Tis is characterize by generation o highly toxic oxygen raicals. Tese injure systemic vascular enothelial cells, lower nitric oxie prouction by these

cells, an interere with prostaglanin balance. Other sequelae

inclue prouction o the lipi-laen macrophage oam cells

seen in placental atherosis; activation o systemic microvascular coagulation, which is manieste by thrombocytopenia; an

greater systemic capillary permeability, which is reecte by

eema an proteinuria.

Intact enothelium has anticoagulant properties. Also, systemic enothelial cells, by releasing nitric oxie, blunt the response

o vascular smooth muscle to agonists. Injure or activate

enothelial cells may prouce less nitric oxie an may secrete

substances that promote coagulation an vasopressor sensitivity.

Further evience o enothelial activation inclues changes in

glomerular capillary enothelial morphology, greater capillary

permeability, an elevate bloo concentrations o substances

associate with enothelial activations. Likely, multiple actors

in the plasma o preeclamptic women combine to exert these

vasoactive eects (Myers, 2007; Walsh, 2009).

Vasospasm and Hypertension

Vasospasm has long been associate with preeclampsia. Systemic enothelial activation causes vasospasm, which elevates

resistance to prouce hypertension. Concurrently, systemic

enothelial cell injury promotes interstitial leakage, an platelets an brinogen are eposite in the subenothelial space.

Enothelial junctional proteins are also isrupte, an the subenothelial region o resistance arteries unergoes ultrastructural change (Suzuki, 2003; Wang, 2002). Te much larger

venous circuit is similarly involve.

With iminishe bloo ow because o malistribution

rom vasospasm an interstitial leakage, ischemia o the surrouning tissues can cause necrosis, hemorrhage, an other

en-organ isturbances. One important clinical correlate to

these changes is the markely attenuate bloo volume seen in

women with severe preeclampsia (Zeeman, 2009).

Increased Pressor Responses

As iscusse in Chapter 4 (p. 53), pregnant women normally evelop reractoriness to inuse vasopressors (AbulKarim, 1961). Women with early preeclampsia, however,

have enhance vascular reactivity to inuse norepinephrine

an angiotensin II (Raab, 1956; alleo, 1968). Moreover,

increase sensitivity to angiotensin II clearly precees the

onset o gestational hypertension (Gant, 1974). Paraoxically,

women who evelop preterm preeclampsia have lower circulating levels o angiotensin II (Chase, 2017).

Numerous prostaglandins are thought to be central to preeclampsia synrome pathophysiology. Specically, the blunte

pressor response seen in normal pregnancy is at least partially

ue to iminishe vascular responsiveness meiate by enothelial prostaglanin synthesis. For example, compare with

normal pregnancy, enothelial prostacyclin (PGI2) prouction

is lower in preeclampsia. Tis action appears to be meiate by

phospholipase A2 (Davige, 2015). At the same time, thromboxane A2 secretion by platelets is increase, an the prostacyclin: thromboxane A2 ratio eclines. Te net result avors

greater sensitivity to inuse angiotensin II an vasoconstriction (Spitz, 1988). Tese changes appear as early as 22 weeks

in gravias who later evelop preeclampsia (Chavarria, 2003).

Nitric oxide is a potent vasoilator an is synthesize rom

1-arginine by enothelial cells. Inhibition o nitric oxie synthesis raises mean arterial pressure, lowers heart rate, an reverses

the pregnancy-inuce reractoriness to vasopressors. Nitric

oxie likely is the compoun that maintains the normal lowpressure vasoilate state characteristic o normal etoplacental

perusion (Myatt, 1992). Nitric oxie meiates the eects o

placental growth actor (PlGF) an vascular enothelial growth

actor (VEGF) in vitro (Zhang, 2017). Te eects o nitric

oxie prouction in preeclampsia are unclear. It appears that

the synrome is associate with ecrease enothelial nitric

oxie synthase expression an thus lower nitric oxie activity

(Davige, 2015).

Endothelins are 21-amino-aci pepties an potent vasoconstrictors. Enothelin l (E-1) is the primary isoorm prouce

by human enothelium (Karumanchi, 2016a). Plasma E-1

levels are elevate in normotensive pregnant women. Women

with preeclampsia have even higher levels, an these pepties

may meiate renal injury (Phipps, 2019). Woman with preeclampsia evelop unctional autoantiboies to the enothelin

an angiotensin II receptors (Buttrup, 2018). Interestingly,

treatment o preeclamptic women with magnesium sulate

lowers E-1 concentrations (Sagsoz, 2003). In animal stuies,

silenal reuces E-1 concentrations (Gillis, 2016).

Angiogenic and Antiangiogenic Factors

Placental vasculogenesis is evient by 21 ays ater conception. Te list o pro- an antiangiogenic substances involve

in placental vascular evelopment is extensive, an the VEGF

an angiopoietin amilies are the most stuie. Angiogenic

imbalance escribes excessive amounts o antiangiogenic actors, which are thought to be stimulate by worsening hypoxia

at the uteroplacental interace. rophoblast o women estine

to evelop preeclampsia overprouce at least two antiangiogenic pepties that enter the

maternal circulation (Karumanchi, 2016b).

First, soluble ms-like tyrosine

kinase 1 (sF1t-1) is a soluble

variant o the membrane-boun

receptor or VEGF. As epicte

in Figure 40-4, elevate maternal sFlt-1 levels inactivate an re-

uce circulating PlGF an VEGF

concentrations, leaing to enot helial ysunction (Phipps, 2019).

As shown in ata rom Myatt

an coworkers (2013), sFlt-1 levels

begin to rise in maternal serum

months beore preeclampsia is

evient (Fig. 40-5). Tese high

levels in the secon trimester are associate with a much higher

risk or preeclampsia evelopment (Haggerty, 2012; March,

2015). Tis elevation rom normal levels appears even sooner

with early-onset isease (Vatten, 2012). Tese actors are also

operative in pregnancies complicate by etal-growth restriction (Herraiz, 2012).

A secon antiangiogenic peptie, soluble endoglin (sEng),

inhibits various transorming growth actor beta (GF-β) iso-

orms rom bining to enothelial receptors (see Fig. 40-4).

Enoglin is one o these receptors. Decrease bining to enoglin iminishes enothelial nitric oxie-epenent vasoilation. Serum levels o sEng also begin to rise months beore

clinical preeclampsia evelops (Haggerty, 2012).

Simultaneously elevate levels o sFlt-1 an sEng are associate with more severe orms o preeclampsia (Phipps, 2019).

In one systematic review, thir-trimester increases in sFlt-1

levels an lower PlGF concentrations were oun to correlate with preeclampsia evelopment ater 25 weeks’ gestation

(Wimer, 2007). From another stuy, oubling o sFlt-1 an

sEng expression increase the preeclampsia risk by 39 an 74

percent, respectively (Haggerty, 2012). Te cause o placental

overprouction o antiangiogenic proteins remains an enigma.

Concentrations o the soluble orms are not higher in etal circulation or amnionic ui o preeclamptic women, an their

levels in maternal bloo issipate ater elivery (Sta, 2007).

Clinical use o antiangiogenic protein levels to preict an

iagnosis preeclampsia is being evaluate (p. 703). Moreover,

one preliminary report escribe therapeutic apheresis to

reuce sFlt-1 levels (Tahani, 2016).

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY

■ Cardiovascular System

Disturbances in the cariovascular system are common with

preeclampsia synrome. Tese are relate to: (1) greater cariac

aterloa impose by hypertension; (2) cariac preloa, which

is reuce by a pathologically iminishe volume expansion

uring pregnancy an which is increase by aministration o

intravenous crystalloi or oncotic solutions; an (3) enothelial

activation leaing to leakage o intravascular ui into the extracellular space.

Hemodynamic Changes and Cardiac Function

Te cariovascular aberrations o pregnancy-relate hypertensive isorers vary. Moiying actors inclue preeclampsia

severity, egree o hypertension, presence o unerlying chronic

isease, an the point in the clinical spectrum in which these are

stuie. In some women, these cariovascular changes may precee hypertension (Easterling, 1990; Khalil, 2012; Melchiorre,

2013). Nevertheless, with the clinical onset o preeclampsia,

cariac output eclines, ue at least in part to greater peripheral

resistance (Ferrazzi, 2018).

Myocardial Function

Serial echocariographic stuies ocument iastolic ysunction in up to 45 percent o women with preeclampsia (Guirguis,

2015; Vaught, 2018). With this ysunction, ventricles o not

properly relax an cannot ll appropriately. In some aecte

women, unctional ierences persist up to 4 years ater elivery

(Evans, 2011; Orabona, 2017). Diastolic ysunction stems

rom ventricular remoeling, which is a malaaptive response to

the increase aterloa o preeclampsia an aims to maintain normal contractility. High levels o antiangiogenic proteins may be

contributory (Shahul, 2016). In otherwise healthy gravias, these

changes are usually inconsequential. But in those with unerlying ventricular ysunction—or example, concentric ventricular

hypertrophy rom chronic hypertension—urther iastolic ys-

unction may cause cariogenic pulmonary eema (Warhana,

2018). Tis is iscusse urther in Chapters 50 (p. 883) an 52

(p. 916).

Ventricular Function

Despite the relatively high requency o iastolic ysunction

with preeclampsia, clinical cariac unction in most aecte

women is appropriate (Hibbar, 2015). In some preeclamptic women, high-sensitivity cariac troponin levels are slightly

elevate (Morton, 2018). With severe preeclampsia, aminoterminal pro–brain natriuretic peptie (N–pro-BNP) levels

are increase (Zachary, 2017).

Women with preeclampsia synrome usually have slightly

hyperynamic ventricular unction (Fig. 40-6). Both these an

normotensive pregnant women have a cariac output that is

appropriate or let-sie lling pressures. Tis pressure can be

altere by intravenous ui volumes. Tus, aggressive hyration results in overtly hyperdynamic ventricular unction. Tis is

accompanie by elevate pulmonary capillary wege pressures,

an pulmonary eema may evelop espite normal ventricular

unction. Tis is partly because o an alveolar enothelial-epithelial leak, an it is compoune by ecrease oncotic pressure

rom a low serum albumin concentration. In sum, aggressive

ui aministration to otherwise normal women with severe

preeclampsia substantially elevates normal let-sie lling

pressures an raises a physiologically normal cariac output to

hyperynamic levels.

■ Blood Volume

In those with eclampsia, hemoconcentration is a hallmark eature

(Pritchar, 1984). Data rom Zeeman an associates (2009)

show that normally expecte pregnancy bloo volume expansion is severely curtaile (Fig. 40-7). Women o average size have

a nonpregnant bloo volume o 3000 mL, an uring the last

several weeks o a normal pregnancy, this averages 4500 mL

(Chap. 4, p. 59). With eclampsia, however, much or all o the

anticipate 1500 mL excess is lost. Such hemoconcentration

results rom generalize vasospasm that ollows enothelial activation an then rom leakage o plasma into the interstitial

space. In women with preeclampsia—epening on its severity—hemoconcentration is usually not as marke.

Tese changes have substantial clinical consequences. Women

with severe hemoconcentration are unuly sensitive to bloo loss

at elivery that otherwise may be consiere normal. Vasospasm

an enothelial leakage o plasma persist or a variable time ater

elivery as the enothelium is restore to normal. As this takes

place, vasoconstriction reverses, an as the bloo volume reexpans, the hematocrit usually alls rom ilution. Importantly, a

substantive cause o this all in hematocrit requently is the blood loss

incurred at delivery.

■ Hematological Changes

Thrombocytopenia

Te platelet count is routinely measure in women with any

orm o gestational hypertension. Te requency an intensity

o thrombocytopenia vary an are epenent on the severity an uration o preeclampsia (Hellmann, 2007; Hupuczi,

2007). Overt thrombocytopenia—ene by a platelet count

<100,000/µL—reects severe isease (see able 40-2). In general, the lower the platelet count, the higher the likelihoo o

maternal an etal morbiity an mortality. In most cases, elivery is avisable because thrombocytopenia usually worsens.

Ater elivery, the platelet count may continue to ecline or

the rst ay or so. It then usually rises progressively to reach

a normal level within 3 to 5 ays. As iscusse later, in some

instances with HELLP synrome, the platelet count continues to all ater elivery. I this nair is elaye until 48 to 72

hours, preeclampsia synrome may be incorrectly attribute to

one o the thrombotic microangiopathies (Chap. 59, p. 1060).

Another platelet alteration is platelet activation an increase

α-egranulation. Tis leas to release o β-thromboglobulin

an actor 4 an to enhance platelet clearance (Kenny, 2015).

Platelet volume concomitantly increases as young platelets

are release (Bellos, 2018). Paraoxically, in most stuies, in

vitro platelet aggregation is reuce compare with the normal

increase that is characteristic o pregnancy. Tis likely is ue to

platelet “exhaustion” ollowing in-vivo activation. Although the

cause is unknown, immunological processes or simply platelet

eposition at sites o enothelial amage may be implicate.

Levels o platelet-boun an circulating platelet-binable

immunoglobulins are elevate, which suggests platelet surace

alterations. Abnormally low platelet levels o not evelop in

the etuses o women with preeclampsia espite severe maternal thrombocytopenia (Kenny, 2015; Pritchar, 1987). Tus,

thrombocytopenia in a hypertensive woman is not a etal inication or cesarean elivery.

Hemolysis

Severe preeclampsia is requently accompanie by hemolysis,

which maniests as elevate serum lactate ehyrogenase levels

an reuce haptoglobin levels (Burwick, 2018). Other evi-

ence comes rom schizocytosis, spherocytosis, an reticulocytosis in peripheral bloo (Cunningham, 1985; Pritchar, 1954,

1976). Re cell istribution with (RDW) reects variability

in the size o circulating re bloo cells, an RDW is higher

in preeclamptic women (Aam, 2019). Tese erangements

result in part rom microangiopathic hemolysis cause by enothelial isruption with platelet aherence an brin eposition.

Cunningham an coworkers (1995) postulate that erythrocyte morphological changes were partially cause by serum

lipi alterations. Relate, substantively ecrease long-chain

atty aci content is oun in erythrocytes o women with preeclampsia (Mackay, 2012).

Ater early reports o hemolysis an thrombocytopenia with

severe preeclampsia, escriptions were ae o abnormally

elevate serum liver transaminase levels that inicate hepatocellular necrosis (Chesley, 1978). Weinstein (1982) reerre to

this combination o events as the HELLP syndrome (p. 699).

Coagulation Changes

Subtle changes consistent with intravascular coagulation commonly are oun with preeclampsia an eclampsia (Cunningham,

2015; von Daelszen, 2018). Some inclue elevate actor VIII

consumption, increase levels o brinopepties A an B an o

d-imers, an reuce concentrations o the regulatory proteins—

antithrombin III an proteins C an S. Coagulation aberrations

generally are mil an selom clinically signicant (Kenny,

2015; Pritchar, 1984). Unless placental abruption is comorbi,

plasma brinogen levels o not ier remarkably rom levels

oun in normal pregnancy (Cunningham, 2015). As preeclampsia worsens, so o abnormal nings with thromboelastography,

which is escribe in Chapter 44 (p. 774) (Pisani-Conway,

2013). Despite these changes, routine laboratory assessments o

coagulation, such as prothrombin time (P), activate partial

thromboplastin time (aP), an plasma brinogen level, are

not require in the management o pregnancy-associate hypertensive isorers.

■ Endocrine and Hormonal Alterations

Plasma levels o renin, angiotensin II, aldosterone, deoxycorticosterone, an atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) are substantively

augmente uring normal pregnancy. ANP is release uring atrial wall stretching rom bloo volume expansion, an it

respons to cariac contractility (Chap. 4, p. 65). Serum ANP

levels rise in pregnancy, an its secretion is urther enhance

in preeclampsia (Gu, 2018). Levels o its precursor—proatrial

natriuretic peptide—also are elevate in preeclampsia. Vasopressin

levels are similar in nonpregnant, in normally pregnant, an

in preeclamptic women, although its metabolic clearance is

elevate in the latter two (Dürr, 1999).

■ Fluid and Electrolyte Alterations

In women with severe preeclampsia, the volume o extracellular

fuid, which maniests as eema, is usually much greater than

that in normal pregnant women. Te mechanism responsible

or pathological ui retention is enothelial injury an subsequent extravasation o intravascular ui. Aecte women also

have reuce plasma oncotic pressure. Tis urther isplaces

intravascular ui into the surrouning interstitium. In women

with preeclampsia, electrolyte concentrations o not ier

appreciably rom those o normal pregnant women.

Following an eclamptic convulsion, the serum pH an

bicarbonate concentration are lowere ue to lactic aciosis an

compensatory respiratory loss o carbon ioxie. Te intensity

o aciosis relates to the amount o lactic aci prouce—

metabolic aciosis—an the rate at which carbon ioxie is

exhale—respiratory aciosis.

■ Kidney

During normal pregnancy, renal bloo ow an glomerular

ltration rate (GFR) rise appreciably (Chap. 4, p. 68). With

preeclampsia, several reversible physiological changes ensue.

O clinical importance, renal perusion an GFR are slightly

reuce. Most o the ecrement in GFR is rom increase renal

aerent arteriolar resistance that may be elevate up to veol

(Conra, 2015; Cornelis, 2011).

Morphological changes are characterize by glomerular endotheliosis, which blocks ltration (Phipps, 2019). Diminishe

ltration causes serum creatinine levels to rise to values seen

in nonpregnant iniviuals, that is, 1 mg/mL, an sometimes

higher. Acute kiney injury is iscusse subsequently.

Plasma uric aci concentration is typically elevate in preeclampsia. Te elevation excees that attributable to the reuce

GFR an likely is also ue to enhance tubular reabsorption

(Chesley, 1945). At the same time, preeclampsia is associate

with iminishe urinary excretion o calcium, perhaps because

o greater tubular reabsorption (auel, 1987).

Proteinuria

Detection o proteinuria helps to establish the iagnosis o

preeclampsia (see able 40-1). Abnormal protein excretion

is empirically ene by 24-hour urinary excretion exceeing

300 mg; a spot urine protein: creatinine ratio ≥0.3; or persistent protein values o 30 mg/L (1+ ipstick) in ranom urine

samples. Although worsening or nephrotic-range proteinuria

was in the past consiere by most to be a sign o severe isease, this oes not appear to be the case (American College o

Obstetricians an Gynecologists, 2013; Bartal, 2020).

Problematically, the optimal metho o establishing abnormal levels o either urine protein or albumin remains to be

ene. For a 24-hour quantitative specimen, the consensus threshol value is ≥300 mg/24 h (American College o

Obstetricians an Gynecologists, 2013; Bartal, 2020). Using

a urinary protein excretion threshol o 165 mg in a 12-hour

sample shows equivalent ecacy (Stout, 2015).

Determination o urinary protein: creatinine ratio may supplant the cumbersome 24-hour quantication (Morris, 2012).

In one systematic review, ranom urine protein:creatinine

ratios <130 to 150 mg/g, that is, 0.13 to 0.15, inicate a

low likelihoo o proteinuria exceeing 300 mg/ (Papanna,

2008). Ratios <0.08 or >1.19 have negative an positive pre-

ictive values o 86 an 96 percent, respectively (Stout, 2013).

However, mirange ratios, or example, 300 mg/g or 0.3, have

poor sensitivity an specicity. Any mirange ratio shoul be

repeate, an i persistent, a 24-hour urine collection or measurement o protein excretion shoul be consiere.

With urine ipstick assessment, results epen on urine

concentration an are notorious or alse-positive an -negative results. A concentrate urine specimen may show a ipstick

value o 1+ to 2+ in women who actually excrete <300 mg/.

Importantly, proteinuria may evelop late, an some women

may alreay be elivere or have ha an eclamptic convulsion

beore it appears. At presentation, 10 to 15 percent o women

with HELLP synrome o not have proteinuria (Sibai, 2004).

In another report, 17 percent o women with eclampsia i not

have proteinuria by the time o seizures (Zwart, 2008).

Anatomical Changes

Sheehan an Lynch (1973) requently oun microscopic

changes that were ientie at autopsy in the kineys o

eclamptic women. Glomeruli are enlarge by approximately 20

percent, they are “blooless,” an capillary loops variably are

ilate an contracte. Enothelial cells are swollen—terme

glomerular capillary endotheliosis (Spargo, 1959). Such swelling

may be severe enough to block or partially block the capillary

lumens (Fig. 40-8). Last, homogeneous subenothelial eposits

o proteins an brin-like material are seen (Hecht, 2017).

Enothelial swelling may result rom angiogenic protein

“withrawal.” Tis is cause by the complexing o ree angiogenic proteins with a compatible circulating antiangiogenic

protein receptor (see Fig. 40-4). Te angiogenic proteins are

crucial or poocyte health, an their inactivation leas to

poocyte ysunction an enothelial swelling (Conra, 2015;

Phipps, 2019). Eclampsia is characterize by greater excretion

o these epithelial poocytes (White, 2014).

Acute Kidney Injury

In one stuy, preeclampsia synrome cause acute kiney injury

(AKI) in 5 percent o patients an in 14 percent o those with

HELLP synrome (Novotny, 2020). With severe preeclampsia,

Roriguez an colleagues (2021) reporte AKI in 15 percent

o women in a stuy rom Parklan Hospital. In most, AKI

was stage 1. In another stuy o 72 women with preeclampsia an renal ailure, hal ha HELLP synrome, an a thir

ha placental abruption (Drakeley, 2002). In a review o 183

women with HELLP synrome, 5 percent ha AKI (Haa,

2000). O those with renal injury, hal ha placental abruption, an most ha postpartum hemorrhage. Abnormal renal

values usually begin to normalize 10 ays or later ater elivery

(Cornelis, 2011; Spaan, 2012). Although mil egrees o AKI

are encountere, clinically apparent acute tubular necrosis is

almost invariably inuce by comorbi hemorrhage an subsequent hypovolemia an hypotension (Chap. 43, p. 753).

o evaluate AKI etiology clinically, urine electrolytes may

be obtaine. Results with preeclampsia reect an intrarenal

cause. In most with preeclampsia, the urine soium concentration is elevate. Instea, changes that inicate a prerenal mechanism inclue increase urine osmolality, elevate urine: plasma

creatinine ratio, an low ractional excretion o soium.

In response to oliguria, soiumcontaining crystalloi temporarily improves urine output. However, rapi

inusions may cause clinically appar ent pulmonary eema (p. 695).

Intensive intravenous ui therapy

is not inicate as “treatment” or

women with preeclampsia an oliguria, unless urine output is iminishe

rom hemorrhage or ui loss rom

vomiting or ever. In nonpregnant iniviuals, intravenous saline inusions

have emonstrate a negative impact

on renal unction. However, at Parklan Hospital, transition rom Ringer

lactate to normal saline i not signi-

cantly impair renal unction in women

with preeclampsia (Yule, 2020).

■ Liver

Hepatic changes are common in

women with severe preeclampsia

synrome. Several gross an microscopic anatomical erangements lea to elevate serum hepatic transaminase levels. Tis

transaminitis inicates hepatocellular injury an is a marker or

severe preeclampsia. Values are selom more than 500 U/L,

but levels exceeing 2000 U/L have been reporte (Chap.

58, p. 1031). In general, serum concentrations inversely ollow

platelet levels, an they both usually return to normal levels

within 3 ays ater elivery.

Anatomical Changes

Regions o periportal hemorrhage in the liver periphery typiy the hepatic lesions o eclampsia (Hecht, 2017; Sheehan,

1973). Extensive involvement such as shown in Figure 40-9 is

unusual. Sheehan an Lynch (1973) escribe that some egree

o hepatic inarction accompanie hemorrhage in almost hal o

women who ie with eclampsia. Tese nings correspone

with reports uring the 1960s that escribe elevate serum

hepatic transaminase levels. Pritchar an associates (1954)

escribe hemolysis an thrombocytopenia with eclampsia.

Tis constellation o hemolysis, hepatocellular necrosis, an

thrombocytopenia was later terme HELLP synrome. Similarities with hepatic sinusoial obstruction are reviewe by von

Salmuth an coworkers (2020).

Liver involvement with preeclampsia may clinically isplay

several maniestations. First, pain is consiere a sign o severe

isease. It typically maniests as moerate to severe right upper

quarant or miepigastric pain an tenerness. Tese women

usually have elevate serum aspartate transaminase (AS) or

alanine transaminase (AL) levels. In some cases, however,

the amount o hepatic tissue involve with inarction may be

surprisingly extensive yet still clinically insignicant. o stuy

this, we perorme magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in 16

women with HELLP synrome (Nelson, 2018). All but two

ha evience o acute liver injury, an the volume o involvement correlate with serum AS levels. Frank inarction is

unusual, an in our experiences, it may be worsene or precipitate by hypotension rom obstetrical hemorrhage. It occasionally causes hepatic ailure—also calle shock liver (Morgan,

2019; Yoshihara, 2016).

Hepatic Hematoma

In another presentation, periportal hemorrhage an inarction

may exten to evelop a hepatic hematoma. Tis in turn can

exten to orm a subcapsular hematoma that may rupture.

Compute tomography (C) scanning or MR imaging greatly

ais iagnosis (Fig. 40-10). Unrupture hematomas are probably more common than clinically suspecte an are more likely

to be oun with HELLP synrome (Nelson, 2018). Although

FIGURE 40-10 Abdominal CT imaging performed postpartum in

a woman with severe HELLP syndrome and right-upper quadrant

pain. A large subcapsular hematoma (asterisk) is seen confluent

with intrahepatic infarction and hematoma (arrowhead). Numerous

flame-shaped hemorrhages are seen at the hematoma interface

(arrows).

once consiere a surgical conition, current management o

a hepatic hematoma is usually observation unless bleeing is

ongoing. In some cases, however, prompt surgical intervention

or angiographic embolization may be liesaving (Chanrasekaran, 2020). In one review o 180 cases o hepatic hematoma or

rupture, 94 percent o aecte gravias ha HELLP synrome,

an in 90 percent o the total, the capsule ha rupture (VigilDe Gracia, 2012). Te maternal mortality rate was 22 percent,

an the perinatal mortality rate was 31 percent. Another review

o 73 cases oun similar outcomes (Gupta, 2021). In rare

cases, liver transplantation is necessary (Escobar Viarte, 2019).

Acute atty liver o pregnancy is sometimes conuse with

preeclampsia (Byrne, 2020; Nelson, 2013). It too has an onset

in late pregnancy, an oten hypertension, elevate serum

transaminase an creatinine levels, an thrombocytopenia

are comorbi. In istinction, the hallmark o acute atty liver

is marke liver ysunction. Liver unction overall is usually

normal in HELLP synrome. able 58-1 (p. 1031) highlights

these clinical ierences.

No convincing ata link pancreatic involvement with preeclampsia synrome. In 407 women with severe preeclampsia, the incience was 1 percent (Sang, 2019). Tat sai, the

occasional case o concurrent hemorrhagic pancreatitis is likely

unrelate (Lynch, 2015). In our experiences rom Parklan

Hospital, lipase an amylase levels are selom elevate in

women with preeclampsia (Nelson, 2018).

HELLP Syndrome

Tis acronym stans or hemolysis, elevate liver enzyme levels, an low platelet count. No strict enition o the syn-

rome is universally accepte, an thus its reporte incience

varies.

In women with preeclampsia, those with HELLP synrome

typically have worse outcomes than those without it (Martin,

2012, 2013). In the previously note stuy o 183 women with

HELLP synrome, 40 percent ha averse outcomes, an two

mothers ie (Haa, 2000). Complications inclue eclampsia

in 6 percent, placental abruption—10 percent, AKI—5 percent,

an pulmonary eema—10 percent. Stroke, hepatic hematoma,

coagulopathy, acute respiratory istress synrome, an sepsis were

other complications. In one review o 693 women with HELLP

synrome, 10 percent ha concurrent eclampsia (Keiser, 2011).

Obstetrical outcomes also may suer. In one stuy comparing

women with HELLP against those with preeclampsia, rates o

eclampsia were greater with HELLP—15 versus 4 percent; preterm birth—93 versus 78 percent; an perinatal mortality—9 versus 4 percent, respectively (Sep, 2009). Because o these marke

clinical ierences, some postulate that HELLP synrome has a

istinct pathogenesis (Reimer, 2013; Vaught, 2016).

■ Central Nervous System

Heaaches an visual symptoms are common with severe preeclampsia, an associate convulsions ene eclampsia. Te

earliest anatomical escriptions o brain involvement came

rom autopsy specimens, but C an MR imaging an Doppler stuies have ae important insights.

Neuroanatomical Lesions

From early anatomical escriptions, brain pathology accounte or only approximately a thir o

atal cases, such as the one shown in Figure 40-11.

In act, most eaths were rom pulmonary eema,

an brain lesions were coinciental. Tus, although

gross intracerebral hemorrhage was seen in up to 60

percent o eclamptic women, it was atal in only hal

o these (Richars, 1988). With ata rom Sheehan

an Lynch (1973) shown in Figure 40-12, cortical an subcortical petechial hemorrhages are other

principal lesions oun at autopsy in women with

eclampsia. Te classic microscopic vascular lesions

consist o brinoi necrosis o the arterial wall an

perivascular microinarcts an hemorrhages. Other

lesions inclue nonhemorrhagic areas o “sotening” throughout the brain, hemorrhages in the

white matter, an subcortical eema (Hecht, 2017;

Willar, 2018). Hemorrhage in the basal ganglia

or pons, oten with rupture into the ventricles, may

evelop.

Cerebrovascular Pathophysiology

Clinical, pathological, an neuroimaging nings have le

to two general theories to explain cerebral abnormalities with

eclampsia. Enothelial cell ysunction likely plays a key role

in both. Te rst theory suggests that in response to acute an

severe hypertension, cerebrovascular overregulation leas to

vasospasm an eventual tissue inarction (rommer, 1988).

Little objective evience supports this mechanism.

Te secon theory is that suen elevations in systemic

bloo pressure excee the normal cerebrovascular autoregulatory

capacity (Schwartz, 2000). Regions o orce vasoilation an

vasoconstriction evelop, especially in arterial bounary zones.

At the capillary level, isruption o en-capillary pressure causes

increase hyrostatic pressure, hyperperusion, an extravasation

o plasma an re cells through enothelial tight-junction openings. Tis leas to vasogenic edema.

Most likely, the true mechanism combines these two. Tus,

a preeclampsia-associate interenothelial cell leak evelops at

bloo pressure levels much lower than those that usually cause

vasogenic eema, an this is couple with a loss o upper-limit

autoregulation (Fugate, 2015; Zeeman, 2009). As shown in

Figure 40-13, these abnormalities maniest as the posterior

reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES). Lesions principally

involve the occipital an parietal cortices, but other areas

are oten involve, although less extensively (Elow, 2013;

Zeeman, 2004a).

Cerebral Blood Flow

Autoregulation is the mechanism by which cerebral bloo

ow remains relatively constant espite alterations in cerebral

perusion pressure. In nonpregnant iniviuals, this mechanism protects the brain rom hyperperusion when mean arterial pressures increase up to 160 mm Hg. Tese pressures are ar

greater than those seen in most women with eclampsia. Tus,

to explain eclamptic seizures, it was theorize that autoregulation must be altere by pregnancy. Some investigators have

shown impaire autoregulation in women with preeclampsia

(Bergman, 2021b; Janzarik, 2014). When stuie 2 to 3 years

postpartum, women who ha preeclampsia ha returne to

normal autoregulation (Janzarik, 2018).

Zeeman an associates (2003) showe that cerebral bloo

ow uring the rst two trimesters o normal pregnancy is similar to nonpregnant values. But uring the last trimester, ow

signicantly rops by 20 percent. Tey oun greater cerebral

bloo ow in this trimester in women with severe preeclampsia compare with ow in normotensive pregnant women (Lee,

2019; Zeeman, 2004b). aken together, these nings suggest

that eclampsia occurs when cerebral hyperperusion orces capillary ui interstitially because o enothelial amage. Tis leak

leas to perivascular eema. Some ata suggest that the bloo-

brain barrier is not impaire, but in-vitro stuies may inicate

increase permeability (Bergman, 2021a; Burwick, 2018).

Neurological Manifestations

Several neurological maniestations typiy the preeclampsia synrome. Each signies severe involvement an requires

immeiate attention.

First, headache and scotomata are thought to arise rom

cerebrovascular hyperperusion that has a preilection or the

occipital lobes. In women preceing an eclamptic convulsion,

up to 75 percent have heaaches, an 20 to 30 percent have

visual changes (Sibai, 2005; Zwart, 2008). Te heaaches vary

in severity an persistence. In our experiences, they are unique

in that they o not usually respon to traitional analgesia but

requently improve ater magnesium sulate inusion.

Convulsions are iagnostic or eclampsia. Tese are cause by

abnormal excessive or synchronous neural activity in the brain.

Evience suggests that extene seizures can cause signicant

brain injury an later brain ysunction.

Blindness an generalized cerebral edema are iscusse in subsequent sections. Last, women with eclampsia have been shown

to have some cognitive ecline when stuie 5 to 10 years ollowing the involve pregnancy (Bergman, 2021c). Tis is iscusse urther in Chapter 41 (p. 727).

Neuroimaging Studies

With C imaging, localize hypoense lesions are requently

seen with eclampsia at the gray- an white-matter junction an

primarily in the parietooccipital lobes. Frontal an inerior

temporal lobes, the basal ganglia, an thalamus are other sites

(Brown, 1988). Tese hypoense areas correspon to petechial

hemorrhages an local eema. Eema o the occipital lobes or

iuse cerebral eema may cause blinness, lethargy, an con-

usion (Cunningham, 2000). Wiesprea eema can appear

as marke compression or even obliteration o the cerebral

ventricles. Such women may evelop signs o impening liethreatening transtentorial herniation.

Several MR imaging acquisitions are use to stuy women

with eclampsia (Singh, 2021). Common nings are hyperintense 2 lesions in the subcortical an cortical regions o

the parietal an occipital lobes, which reect PRES (see Fig.

40-13). Te basal ganglia, brainstem, an cerebellum are other

involve sites (Brewer, 2013; Zeeman, 2004a). PRES lesions are

almost universal in women with eclampsia, an their incience

in women with severe preeclampsia approximates 20 percent

(Hosapatna Basavarajappa, 2020; Mayama, 2016). Although

usually reversible, a ourth o these hyperintense lesions with

eclampsia have restricte iusion that signiy cerebral inarctions. Tese have persistent MR imaging nings (Loureiro,

2003; Zeeman, 2004a).

Visual Changes and Blindness

Retinal artery an venular calibers are ecrease in women with

preeclampsia (Soma-Pillay, 2018). Tese changes, along with

visual cortex involvement, can cause scotomata, blurre vision,

or iplopia, which is common with severe preeclampsia an

eclampsia. Tese symptoms usually improve with magnesium

sulate therapy, or lowere bloo pressure, or both.

Blindness is rare with preeclampsia alone, but it complicates

up to 15 percent o women with eclampsia (Cunningham,

1995). It can evelop a week or more ollowing elivery. Blin-

ness is usually reversible an may arise rom three potential

areas. Tese are the occipital lobe’s visual cortex, the lateral

geniculate nuclei, an the retina.

Occipital blinness is also calle amaurosis. With MR imaging,

aecte women usually have evience o extensive occipital lobe

vasogenic eema. O 15 women care or at Parklan Hospital,

occipital blinness laste rom 4 hours to 8 ays, but it resolve

completely in all cases (Cunningham, 1995). Rarely, extensive

cerebral inarctions may result in total or partial visual eects.

In the retina, ischemia, inarction, or serous etachment

may occur (Hanor, 2014). Retinal inarction, terme Purtscher

retinopathy, is rare (Fig. 40-14). Serous retinal detachment is

usually unilateral an selom causes total visual loss. Asymptomatic serous retinal etachment is relatively common with

preeclampsia (Gupta, 2019). In most cases o eclampsia-associate blinness, visual acuity subsequently improves (Manura,

2021). I blinness is cause by retinal artery occlusion, vision

may be permanently impaire (Roos, 2012).

Cerebral Edema

Maniestations that suggest wiesprea cerebral eema are

worrisome. During 13 years at Parklan Hospital, 10 o 175

women with eclampsia were iagnose with symptomatic cerebral eema (Cunningham, 2000). Symptoms range rom lethargy, conusion, an blurre vision to obtunation an coma.

In most cases, symptoms waxe an wane. O these 10, three

became comatose an ha imaging nings o transtentorial

herniation. One woman ie.

Mental status changes generally correlate with the egree

o involvement seen with C an MR imaging stuies. Tese

women are very susceptible to sudden and severe blood pressure

elevations, which can acutely worsen the already widespread vasogenic edema. Tus, careul bloo pressure control is essential.

■ Uteroplacental Perfusion

Compromise uteroplacental perusion is almost certainly a major

contributor to the increase perinatal morbiity an mortality

rates associate with preeclampsia synrome (Harmon, 2015).

Contributing eects in enovascular trophoblastic invasion were

iscusse earlier (p. 692). Tus, measurement o uterine, intervillous, an placental bloo ow woul likely be inormative.

Attempts to assess these in humans have been hampere. Barriers

inclue the placenta’s inaccessibility, the complexity o its venous

efuent, an the nee or invasive techniques or raioisotopes.

As a surrogate, sonographic measurement o uterine artery

bloo ow velocity can estimate resistance to uteroplacental bloo ow. Vascular resistance is estimate by comparing

arterial systolic an iastolic velocity waveorms (Chap. 14, p.

262). By the completion o placentation, impeance to uterine

artery bloo ow is markely ecrease, but with abnormal placentation, abnormally high resistance persists (Everett, 2012;

Napolitano, 2012). In earlier stuies, peak systolic:iastolic

velocity ratios rom uterine an umbilical arteries in preeclamptic pregnancies were measure. In some cases, but not all, resistance was higher (Ferrazzi, 2018; ruinger, 1990).

Another Doppler waveorm, terme uterine artery “notching,” has been linke with increase risks or preeclampsia

or etal-growth restriction (Groom, 2009). However, in one

MFMU Network stuy, notching ha a low preictive value

except or early-onset, severe isease (Myatt, 2012a).

Resistance in uterine spiral arteries also has been measure.

In one stuy, mean resistance values were greater in all women

with preeclampsia compare with those in normotensive controls (Matijevic, 1999). Another stuy use MR imaging an

other techniques to assess placental perusion ex vivo in the

myometrial arteries remove rom women with preeclampsia

or etal-growth restriction (Ong, 2003). In both conitions,

myometrial arteries exhibite similar vascular responses.

Despite these nings, evience or compromise uteroplacental circulation is oun in only a ew women who later

evelop preeclampsia. Inee, when preeclampsia evelops

uring the thir trimester, only a thir o women with severe

isease have abnormal uterine artery velocimetry (Li, 2005). In

a stuy o 50 women with HELLP synrome, only a thir ha

abnormal uterine artery waveorms (Bush, 2001). In general,

the extent o abnormal waveorms correlates with severity o

etal involvement (Ghiini, 2008; Groom, 2009).

Tese sonographic nings have value or preiction o etalgrowth restriction but not preeclampsia (American College o

Obstetricians an Gynecologists, 2019b; Demers, 2019). Several other ow velocity waveorms have been investigate or

preeclampsia preiction. However, none is suitable or clinical

use (De Kat, 2019; ownsen, 2018).

Fetal-growth Restriction

Discusse in etail in Chapter 47, this potential consequence o

preeclampsia can serve as one severity inicator (see able 40-2).

Namely, poor growth is usually conne to etuses o women

estine to evelop severe preeclampsia (Mateus, 2019). Perry

an colleagues (2020) reporte that pregnancies complicate by

etal-growth restriction more likely ha maternal hemoynamic

inices similar to preeclampsia. Measures showe higher mean

arterial pressure, greater systemic vascular resistance, lower car-

iac output, an elevate uterine artery pulsatility inex. Fetuses

born to preeclamptic mothers have cariac remoeling similar

to growth-restricte etuses (Youse, 2020).

PREDICTION

Some biological markers implicate in the genesis o the preeclampsia synrome have been measure to help preict its

evelopment. Although most have been evaluate in the rst hal

o pregnancy, some have been teste as preictors o severity in

the thir trimester. Still others have been use to orecast recurrent preeclampsia. Overall, these eorts have resulte in testing

strategies with poor sensitivity an poor positive preictive values

or preeclampsia (Cone-Aguelo, 2015; De Kat, 2019). Currently, no screening tests or preeclampsia are predictably reliable,

valid, and economical.

Because combinations o tests an risk actors might be superior to single preictors, some have evelope multivariable

screening algorithms (Boutin, 2021; Brunelli, 2020; Copel, 2020;

Serra, 2020; Snell, 2020). One rst-trimester screening protocol

using serum sFlt-1 levels has been propose (Pihl, 2020). Other

examples are mipregnancy algorithms (Black, 2020; Peguero,

2021; Stepan, 2020). None has been aequately verie su-

ciently or wiesprea clinical use (Capriglione, 2020).

■ Vascular Resistance Testing

and Placental Perfusion

Most tests in this category are cumbersome, time consuming,

an inaccurate. o evaluate bloo pressure changes, three tests

assess the bloo pressure rise in response to a stimulus. In one,

women at 28 to 32 weeks’ gestation rest in the let lateral ecubitus position an then roll to lie supine. With this roll-over

test, rising bloo pressure in response to the maneuver signi-

es a positive test. Te isometric exercise test employs the same

principle by squeezing a hanball. Te angiotensin II inusion

test provies incrementally higher oses intravenously, an the

hypertensive response is quantie. Sensitivities o all three

tests range rom 55 to 70 percent, an specicities approximate 85 percent (Cone-Aguelo, 2015).

Uterine artery Doppler velocimetry is posite to reect aulty

trophoblastic invasion o the spiral arteries. Te poor preictive

value o this or preeclampsia was escribe in the Uteroplacental Perusion section (p. 702).

■ FetalPlacental Unit Endocrine Function

Several serum analytes have been propose to help preict preeclampsia. Newer ones are continually ae. In general, none

o these tests is clinically benecial or hypertension preiction.

■ Renal Function Tests

Hyperuricemia results rom reuce uric aci clearance cause

by iminishe glomerular ltration, increase tubular reabsorption, an ecrease secretion. In one stuy, the sensitivity

o serum uric aci levels to etect preeclampsia range rom 0

to 55 percent, an specicity was 77 to 95 percent (Cnossen,

2006). Tese are selom use to iagnose preeclampsia (Chescheir, 2019).

Isolate gestational proteinuria is a risk actor or preeclampsia (Jayaballa, 2015; Morgan, 2016). But, as a preictive test or

preeclampsia, microalbuminuria has sensitivities ranging rom

7 to 90 percent an specicities spanning 29 to 97 percent

(Cone-Aguelo, 2015).

■ Endothelial Dysfunction and Oxidative Stress

Enothelial activation an inammation are major participants

in preeclampsia pathophysiology. Levels o some implicate

compouns are elevate in the bloo o aecte women an

have been assesse as preictors.

Fibronectins are high-molecular-weight glycoproteins release

rom enothelial cells an extracellular matrix ollowing enothelial injury. In one systematic review, however, neither cellular

nor total bronectin levels were clinically useul to preict preeclampsia (Leeang, 2007).

Trombocytopenia an platelet dysunction are integral eatures o preeclampsia. Platelet activation causes their augmente

estruction an lower bloo concentrations. Platelet volume

is increase because o platelet immaturity, an platelet volume has been escribe to be an early preictor o preeclampsia (Bellos, 2019; Mayer-Pickel, 2021). Although markers o

coagulation activation escribe earlier (p. 696) are elevate,

they substantively overlap with levels in normotensive pregnant

women (von Daelszen, 2018).

O oxidative stress markers, higher levels o lipi peroxies

couple with ecrease antioxiant activity can be seen with

preeclampsia. Other markers are iron, transerrin, and erritin; resistin; hyperhomocysteinemia; blood lipids; an antioxi-

ants such as ascorbic acid an vitamin E (Christiansen, 2015;

Cone-Aguelo, 2015; Mackay, 2012; Mignini, 2005). However, none has sucient preictive value.

■ Angiogenic and Antiangiogenic

Factor Imbalance

An imbalance in angiogenic an antiangiogenic actors is convincingly linke to preeclampsia pathogenesis (p. 694). Serum

levels o VEGF an PlGF begin to rop beore clinical preeclampsia evelops. At the same time, levels o some antiangiogenic actors, such as sFlt-1 an sEng, begin to rise. Factor levels

an ratios ier signicantly between women with preeclampsia

an those who are normotensive. Tese show especially goo

preictive perormance with early-onset preeclampsia (Burton,

2019; Cereira, 2019; Phipps, 2019; Stepan, 2020).

Tese tests also can serve as iagnostic ajuncts (Duhig,

2019; Zeisler, 2016). First, they may ai ierentiating

between preeclampsia an mimics that inclue chronic hypertension, chronic kiney isease, systemic lupus erythematosus,

an immunological thrombocytopenia. Tese tests can also

help ierentiate mil an severe isease. Tese plus other

multiple markers will likely have a uture role in rst-trimester

preeclampsia screening (Sovio, 2019).

■ Other Markers

Cell-ree DNA (cDNA) o placental origin can be etecte in

maternal plasma (Chap. 16, p. 327). It is hypothesize that

cDNA is release in preeclampsia by accelerate apoptosis o

cytotrophoblasts. However, one MFMU Network stuy oun

no correlation between total cDNA levels an preeclampsia

preiction (Silver, 2017).

Other investigate markers inclue glycosylate hemoglobin A1c, serum cystatin-c, an rst-trimester estimate placental volume (Bellos, 2019; Cavero-Reono, 2018; Kim, 2021).

Proteomic, metabolomic, an transcriptomic technologies can

be employe to stuy serum an urinary proteins an cellular

metabolites. Preliminary stuies inicate their potential preictive value (Bahao-Singh, 2013; Ma, 2014).

PREVENTION

Various strategies use to prevent or moiy preeclampsia

severity have been evaluate. Some are liste in Table 40-4.

With the possible exception o aspirin, none is convincingly

an reproucibly eective.

■ Dietary and Lifestyle Modifications

A low-salt iet was one o the earliest researche preventions

but is not supporte by ata (De Snoo, 1937). O stuies, one

ranomize trial showe that a soium-restricte iet was ine-

ective in preventing preeclampsia (Knuist, 1998).

Regular exercise uring pregnancy is linke to a lower risk o

eveloping preeclampsia (Barakat, 2016; Morris, 2017). In one

systematic review, a similar tren towar risk reuction with

exercise was note (Kasawara, 2012). Only a ew stuies have

been ranomize.

Somewhat relate, one retrospective cohort stuy o 677

nonhypertensive women were hospitalize or be rest because

o threatene preterm elivery (Abenhaim, 2008). When outcomes o these women were compare with those o the general

obstetrical population, be rest was associate with a signi-

cantly reuce risk o eveloping preeclampsia (relative risk

0.27). From two small ranomize trials, prophylactic be rest

or 4 to 6 hours aily at home was successul in signicantly

lowering the preeclampsia incience in women with normal

bloo pressures (Meher, 2006). Currently, the Society or

Maternal-Fetal Meicine (2020) oes not recommen reuce

activity or women with hypertensive isorers or or prevention o preeclampsia.

Calcium supplementation has been stuie, but in one trial

o more than 4500 low-risk nulliparas, supplementation aile

to ecrease the risk or preeclampsia or pregnancy-associate

hypertension (Levine, 1997). Similar nings were reporte

rom another trial (Homeyer, 2019). In aggregate, most trials

show that unless women are calcium ecient, supplementation oers no benets (Palacios, 2019; Sanchez-Ramos, 2017).

Subclinical hypothyroidism is associate with increase preeclampsia risk. Tis insuciency has been postulate to stem

rom ioine eciency, but a recent metaanalysis oun no association between ioine suciency an preeclampsia (Businge,

2021). Folic acid was evaluate in a ranomize trial (Wen,

2018). Nearly 2500 high-risk women were given a 4-mg olic

aci ose aily or placebo. Te incience o preeclampsia in

both groups approximate 14 percent.

Cardioprotective atty acids oun in some sh likely prevent

inammation-meiate atherogenesis. Tus, it was posite that

they might also prevent preeclampsia. However, ranomize

trials conucte thus ar show no such benets rom sh oil

supplementation (Zhou, 2012). In one longituinal cohort

stuy, a seaoo iet, compare with a western one, provie a

protective eect against preeclampsia (Ikem, 2019).

■ Antihypertensive Drugs

Because o the prior purporte benets o soium restriction

or preeclampsia prevention, iuretic therapy became popular

with the avent o chlorothiazie in 1957 (Flowers, 1962). In

one metaanalysis o nine ranomize trials with more than

7000 pregnancies, women given iuretics ha a lower incience

o eema an hypertension but not o preeclampsia (Churchill,

2007). Because women with chronic hypertension are at high

risk or preeclampsia, several ranomize trials have evaluate

various antihypertensive rugs to reuce the incience o superimpose preeclampsia (Chap. 41, p. 713). A critical analysis o

these trials by Sta an coworkers (2015) aile to emonstrate

benets or this goal.

■ Antioxidants

Data imply that an imbalance between oxiant an antioxiant

activity plays a role in preeclampsia pathogenesis. Tus, naturally occurring antioxiants—vitamins C, D, an E—might

reuce such oxiation. Several ranomize stuies have assesse

antioxiant vitamin supplementation or women at high risk

or preeclampsia (Burton, 2019; Villar, 2009). Te Combine

Antioxiant an Preeclampsia Preiction Stuies (CAPPS) by

the MFMU Network inclue almost 10,000 low-risk nulliparas (Roberts, 2010). None o these stuies showe reuce

preeclampsia rates in women supplemente with vitamins C

an E compare with those given placebo.

Statins were propose to prevent preeclampsia because they

stimulate heme oxygenase-1 expression, which inhibits sF1t-1

release. Early animal ata suggest that statins may prevent

hypertensive isorers o pregnancy (Lewis, 2017). Te MFMU

Network plans a ranomize trial to test pravastatin or prevention, an a pilot stuy is complete (Costantine, 2016).

Metormin inhibits hypoxic inducible actor 1α by lowering mitochonrial electron transport chain activity. It reuces

sFlt-1 an sEng activity an thus has potential to prevent

preeclampsia (Brownoot, 2016). In a preliminary stuy, pre-

iabetic women were given metormin or placebo throughout

pregnancy, an metormin-treate women ha a lower inci-

ence o severe preeclampsia (Racine, 2021). However, other

clinical stuies are lacking.

■ Antithrombotic Agents

Preeclampsia is characterize by vasospasm, enothelial cell

ysunction, inammation, an activation o platelets an the

coagulation–hemostasis system. Other sequelae inclue placental inarction an spiral artery thrombosis (Nelson, 2014).

Tus, antithrombotic agents have been evaluate to prevent

preeclampsia. Low-molecular-weight heparin has been stuie

in ranomize trials. In a subsequent metaanalysis using iniviual ata rom 963 women, the risk or recurrent preeclampsia, abruption, or etal-growth restriction was similar in women

receiving heparin or placebo (Roger, 2016).

Low-dose Aspirin

In low oses o 50 to 150 mg aily, aspirin eectively inhibits

platelet thromboxane A2 biosynthesis. It has minimal eects

on vascular prostacyclin prouction. Still, several clinical trials

have shown limite benets in preeclampsia prevention. In a

ranomize trial rom the MFMU Network, risks or averse

outcomes were not signicantly reuce with aspirin therapy

(Caritis, 1998). Tis stuy was ollowe by numerous similar

stuies an metaanalyses.

In another ranomize trial o more than 1600 women at

high risk or preterm preeclampsia, oral low-ose aspirin was

given aily rom 11 to 14 weeks’ gestation until 36 weeks to prevent recurrence (Rolnik, 2017). Te rate o preterm preeclampsia recurrence was 1.6 percent in the aspirin group compare

with 4.3 percent in the placebo arm. In a metaanalysis, Roberge

an colleagues (2017) oun that aspirin prophylaxis initiate

beore 16 weeks’ gestation was associate with a signicant risk

reuction—approximately 60 percent—o preeclampsia an

etal-growth restriction. At the same time, however, Meher

an associates (2017) perorme an iniviual participant ata

metaanalysis an reporte a much lower—approximately 10

percent—risk reuction. Eects were signicant whether therapy was initiate beore or ater 16 weeks’ gestation.

In a subsequent metaanalysis, Roberge an coworkers (2018)

oun that aspirin prophylaxis given starting ≤16 weeks’ gestation reuce the risk o preterm, but not term, preeclampsia.

urner an colleagues (2020) reporte that aspirin improve

some perinatal outcomes inepenent o eects on preeclampsia risk. But to the contrary, the review by Chaemsaithong an

coworkers (2020) oun no benets even when low-ose aspirin was given beore 11 weeks’ gestation.

Base on these ata, the U.S. Preventive Services ask Force

(2021) recommens low-ose aspirin prophylaxis or women

at high risk or preeclampsia. Te American College o Obstetricians an Gynecologists (2018, 2020) now recommens

low-ose aspirin be given between 12 an 28 weeks’ gestation

to help prevent preeclampsia in high-risk women. Caniates

inclue those with ≥1 o the ollowing: prior preeclampsia,

chronic hypertension, overt iabetes, renal isease, autoimmune isorers, an multietal gestation. Supplementation

may be considered or those with more than one o these qualities: nulliparous, age oler than 35 years, obese, amily history o preeclampsia, vulnerable socioemographics, an prior

low-birthweight or growth-restricte neonate. Tese results

have also raise the question as to whether all pregnant women

shoul be given aspirin (Ayala, 2019).

Low-dose aspirin coupled with heparin mitigates thrombotic sequelae in women with lupus anticoagulant (Chap.

62, p. 1116). Because o a similarly high prevalence o placental thrombotic lesions oun with severe preeclampsia,

trials have assesse the possible merits o such treatments

or women with prior preeclampsia. In two ranomize trials, women with a history o early-onset preeclampsia were

given aspirin alone or a regimen o enoxaparin plus aspirin

(Groom, 2017; Haa, 2016). Outcomes were similar.

Low-molecular-weight heparin, with or without aspirin, may

ecrease the risk or preeclampsia in high-risk women (e

Vries, 2012; Wang, 2020).

Nhận xét