Chapter 41. Clinical Management of the Preeclampsia Syndrome. Will Obs.

 Clinical Management of the Preeclampsia Syndrome

BS. Nguyễn Hồng Anh

Preeclampsia remains one of the leading causes of death and severe maternal morbidity. This chapter discusses many clinical aspects of the preeclampsia syndrome and its management after recognition. Also presented are the long-term consequences that may accrue in affected women. The pathophysiology of preeclampsia was detailed in Chapter 40.

DIAGNOSIS AND EVALUATION

Diagnosis

In routine prenatal care, gravidas are seen more often during the third trimester, and this aids early detection of preeclampsia. However, it cannot always be diagnosed definitively. Increases in systolic and diastolic blood pressure can be either normal physiological changes or signs of developing pathology. Women without overt hypertension, but in whom the early development of preeclampsia is suspected, are seen more frequently. Heightened surveillance permits recognition of ominous changes in blood pressure, critical laboratory findings, and clinical signs and symptoms. Outpatient surveillance continues unless overt hypertension, proteinuria, headache, visual changes, or epigastric pain supervene. At Parkland Hospital, women with new-onset overt hypertension—either diastolic pressures ≥90 mm Hg or systolic pressures ≥140 mm Hg— are admitted to exclude preeclampsia or to define its severity.

Evaluation

With hospitalization, a systematic evaluation begins:

• Detailed examination, which is coupled with daily scrutiny for headache, visual changes, or epigastric pain

• Daily weight measurement to identify rapid weight gain

• Quantification of proteinuria or a urine protein: creatinine ratio

• Blood pressure readings with an appropriate-size cu every 4 hours, unless previously elevated, which would manate more frequent readings

• Measurements of serum creatinine an hepatic transaminase levels an a hemogram that inclues a platelet count. The frequency o testing is etermine by hypertension severity. Although some recommen assessment o serum uric aci an lactate ehyrogenase levels an coagulation, their value has been questione (Chescheir, 2019; Cone-Aguelo, 2015)

• Evaluation o etal size an well-being an amnionic ui volume

• Reuce physical activity may have benets, although evi- ence is not robust. Still investigational as a clinical tool, measurements o placental growth actor (PlGF) an soluble ms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sF1t-1) levels will likely be available to help preict preeclampsia (Barton, 2020; Chappell, 2013; Zeisler, 2016). Chapter 40 (p. 694) escribes their role in preeclampsia genesis.

In sum, evaluation goals are early ientication o preeclampsia an then management until timely elivery. Complete abatement o all signs an symptoms is uncommon until ater elivery. I severe preeclampsia is iagnose using the criteria in able 40-2 (p. 690), urther management is subsequently escribe.

Consideration for Delivery

With gestational hypertension, its morbidity and management vary depending on hypertension severity, presence of preeclampsia, and gestational age of the fetus. The basic management objectives for any pregnancy complicated by preeclampsia are: (1) termination of pregnancy with the least possible trauma to mother and fetus, (2) birth of a healthy newborn that subsequently thrives, and (3) complete restoration of health to the mother. In many with preeclampsia, especially those at or near term, all three objectives are served equally well by induction of labor. Termination of pregnancy is the only known cure for preeclampsia. Headache, visual changes, or epigastric pain are indicative that convulsions may be imminent, and oliguria is another ominous sign. Severe preeclampsia almost always demands anticonvulsant and antihypertensive therapy, followed by delivery. Treatment for eclampsia is identical. Prime objectives are to orestall convulsions, control blood pressure to prevent intracranial hemorrhage and serious damage to other organs, an eliver a healthy newborn. Tis is true even when the cervix is unfavorable. Labor induction is carrie out, usually with preinuction cervical ripening (Chap. 26, p. 488).

Concerns stemming rom an unavorable cervix, a perceive sense o urgency because o preeclampsia severity, an a nee to coorinate neonatal intensive care have le some to avocate or cesarean elivery. In an earlier stuy rom Parklan Hospital, Alexaner an colleagues (1999) reviewe 278 singleton liveborn neonates weighing 750 to 1500 g elivere o women with severe preeclampsia. In hal o the women, labor was inuce, an inuction was successul in accomplishing vaginal elivery in a thir. Similar ata were reporte rom the Consortium on Sae Labor (Coviello, 2019). In this stuy, hal o 914 women with severe preeclampsia unerwent inuction, an hal o these were elivere vaginally. Others have reporte similar observations (Alanis, 2008; Rolan, 2017). For these reasons, we attempt labor inuction an reserve cesarean elivery or other obstetrical inications.

With preeclampsia without severe eatures, optimal elivery timing has not been wiely stuie. A ranomize trial o 756 women with mil preeclampsia supporte elivery ater 37 weeks’ gestation (Koopmans, 2009). Tis practice is also supporte by the American College o Obstetricians an Gynecologists (2020a). At Parklan Hospital, we eliver women with preeclampsia without severe eatures at 38 weeks’ gestation.

With a preterm etus, the tenency is to elay elivery to help reuce the risk o neonatal eath or serious morbiity rom prematurity. Such a policy certainly is justie in miler cases. Assessments o etal well-being an placental unction are perorme, especially when the etus is immature. o assess these, most recommen requent perormance o nonstress testing or biophysical proles, which are escribe in Chapter 20 (p. 392). Te American College o Obstetricians an Gynecologists (2021a,b) recommens consieration or antenatal surveillance twice weekly or those with gestational hypertension an nonsevere eatures an aily testing or those with severe eatures.

With late-preterm etuses, that is, those between 34 an 36 weeks’ gestation, the ecision to eliver is less clear (Barton, 2011; Langenvel, 2011). Te Dutch HYPIA-II stuy ran- omly assigne women with nonsevere hypertension between 34 an 37 weeks to immeiate elivery or to expectant management (Broekhuijsen, 2015). Immeiate elivery reuce the risks or averse maternal outcomes—1.1 versus 3.1 percent.

However, it increase the risk or neonatal respiratory istress synrome— 5.7 versus 1.7 percent. In a more recent stuy, 901 women at 34 to <37 weeks’ gestation with nonsevere preeclampsia were ranomly assigne to early elivery or expectant management (Chappell, 2019). A thir o each group sel-stratie into intervals o 34, 35, an 36 weeks’ gestation. For women in the immeiate elivery group, rates o the primary maternal outcomes, which were eatures o severe preeclampsia, were signicantly lower than in the expectant group. Conversely, rates o averse perinatal outcomes, which were perinatal eaths or neonatal unit amission, were signicantly greater in the immeiate elivery group. Similar nings were reporte by other (Bernares, 2019; Chatzakis, 2021). Last, the PEACOCK stuy oun that angiogenic biomarkers i not help etermine the nee or elivery in latepreterm preeclampsia (Duhig, 2021). At Parklan Hospital, we avor an active management approach given the maternal risks o expectant management. However, i preeclampsia is nonsevere, we routinely inuce ater 38 complete weeks.

■ Inpatient or Outpatient Care

For women with mil to moerate stable hypertension, whether or not preeclampsia has been conrme, monitoring is continue. During surveillance, reuce physical activity throughout much o the ay, at least intuitively, seems reasonable. Complete be rest was not recommene in the prior consensus work o the American College o Obstetricians an Gynecologists’ ask Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy (2013). Also, the Society or Maternal-Fetal Meicine (2020b) suggests that activity restriction not be prescribe or women with hypertensive isorers. Complete be rest is pragmatically unachievable because o the severe restrictions it places on otherwise well women. It likely also preisposes to thromboembolism (Knight, 2007; McCarty-Singleton, 2014).

o reuce activity, several stuies have aresse the benets o inpatient care an outpatient management. Te concept o prolonge hospitalization or women with hypertension arose uring the 1970s. At Parklan Hospital, an inpatient antepartum unit was establishe in 1973 by Dr. Peggy Whalley to provie care or such women. Initial results rom this unit were reporte by Hauth (1976) an Gilstrap (1978) an their coworkers. Most hospitalize women have a benecial response characterize by amelioration or improvement o hypertension. Tese women are not “cured,” and nearly 90 percent have recurrent hypertension beore or during labor. By 2020, more than 10,000 nulliparas with mil to moerate, early-onset hypertension uring pregnancy ha been manage successully in this unit. Tis relatively simple unit requires moest nursing care, no rugs other than iron an olate supplements, an ew essential laboratory tests. Provier costs— not charges—or this care are minimal compare with the cost o neonatal intensive care or a preterm neonate. Importantly, thromboembolic isease has been rare in these women. Many clinicians believe that urther hospitalization is not warrante i hypertension abates within a ew ays, an this has embolene thir-party payers to eny inpatient reimbursement.

Consequently, many women with mil to moerate hypertension are manage at home. For women in vulnerable socioemographic home situations, this strategy may not be easible. In other groups, outpatient management may continue as long as preeclampsia synrome oes not worsen an etal jeopary is not suspecte. Decrease activity is recommene, an women are encourage to report symptoms. Home bloo pressure an urine protein monitoring or requent evaluations by a visiting nurse may be benecial.

o assess this approach, 1182 nulliparas with mil gestational hypertension—20 percent ha proteinuria—were manage with home care (Barton, 2002). Teir mean gestational ages were 32 to 33 weeks at enrollment an 36 to 37 weeks at elivery. Severe preeclampsia evelope in approximately 20 percent, two women ha eclampsia, an 3 percent evelope hemolysis, elevate liver enzyme levels, an low platelet count (HELLP) synrome. Perinatal outcomes were generally goo.

In approximately 20 percent, etal growth was restricte, an the perinatal mortality rate was 4.2 eaths in 1000 births.

Table 41-1 presents two stuies that compare continue hospitalization an outpatient care. In the rst trial, ater hospital evaluation, 218 women with mil gestational nonproteinuric hypertension were ranomly assigne to continue hospitalization versus home care (Crowther, 1992). Te mean hospitalization uration was 22.2 ays or women with inpatient management compare with only 6.5 ays in the home care group. Severe hypertension an preterm elivery beore 34 an beore 37 weeks’ gestation were signicantly increase twool in the outpatient group. Despite this, maternal an newborn outcomes were otherwise similar.

Another approach, popular in Europe, is ay care. In the secon trial (able 41-1), 374 women with gestational hypertension were ranomize to either ay care or inpatient care (urnbull, 2004). Almost 95 percent ha mil to moerate hypertension an 86 women ha ≥1+ proteinuria. Tere were

no perinatal eaths, an none o the women evelope eclampsia or HELLP synrome. Costs or either scheme were not signicantly ierent, an general satisaction avore ay care.

In sum, either inpatient or close outpatient management

is appropriate or a woman with mil e novo hypertension,

incluing those with nonsevere preeclampsia. Keys to success

are close surveillance an patients with home support an

access to care.

Antihypertensive Therapy for Mild to Moderate Hypertension

Antihypertensive rugs have been evaluate to prolong pregnancy or moiy perinatal outcomes in pregnancies complicate by various hypertensive isorers. reatment or women with chronic hypertension complicating pregnancy is iscusse in Chapter 53 (p. 949). Drug treatment or early mil preeclampsia has been isappointing (Table 41-2). Sibai an associates (1987a) reporte that women given labetalol ha signicantly lower mean bloo pressures than those given a placebo. However, mean pregnancy prolongation, gestational age at elivery, an birthweights i not ier between groups.

Te cesarean elivery rate an the number o newborns amitte to special-care nurseries also were similar. Te requency o growth-restricted neonates was doubled in women given labetalol compared with placebo—19 versus 9 percent.

Te three other stuies liste in able 41-2 compare labetalol or a calcium-channel blocker rugs against placebo. Except or ewer episoes o severe hypertension, none o these stuies showe any benets rom antihypertensive treatment (Magee, 2015). One review o 49 ranomize trials o antihypertensive therapy or mil to moerate gestational hypertension compare with either no treatment or placebo reache similar conclusions (Abalos, 2014).

■ Expectant Management of Preterm

Severe Preeclampsia

Up through the early 1990s, women with severe preeclampsia were usually immeiately elivere. Subsequently, however, another approach or women with preterm severe preeclampsia was stuie. Te aim o “expectant” management was to improve neonatal outcome without compromising maternal saety. Tis approach always inclues careul aily—an usually more requent—inpatient monitoring o the mother an her etus.

Teoretically, antihypertensive therapy has potential application when severe preeclampsia evelops beore intact neonatal survival is expecte. Such management has been controversial an is potentially angerous (Churchill, 2018). In one o the rst stuies, Sibai an the Memphis group (1985) attempte to prolong pregnancy because o etal immaturity in 60 women with severe preeclampsia between 18 an 27 weeks. Te results were disastrous. Te perinatal mortality rate was 87 percent.

Although no mothers ie, 13 suere placental abruption, 10 ha eclampsia, three evelope renal ailure, two ha hypertensive encephalopathy, one ha an intracerebral hemorrhage, an another ha a rupture hepatic hematoma. Because o their early stuy, the Memphis group reene criteria an perorme a ranomize trial o aggressive versus expectant management or 95 women who ha severe preeclampsia but with more avance gestations o 28 to 32 weeks (Sibai, 1994). Women with HELLP syndrome were excluded rom this trial. Aggressive management inclue glucocorticoi aministration or etal lung maturation ollowe by elivery in 48 hours. Expectantly manage women were observe at be rest an given either labetalol or nieipine orally or severe hypertension. In this stuy, pregnancy was prolonge or a mean o 15.4 ays in the expectant management group. An overall improvement in neonatal outcomes also was reporte.

In women expectantly manage at 23 to 34 weeks’ gestation, serious complications have inclue placental abruption, HELLP synrome, pulmonary eema, renal ailure, an eclampsia (Table 41-3). Moreover, perinatal mortality rates average 90 per 1000 births. Fetal-growth restriction was common, an in stuies rom Te Netherlans, it was an astoun- ing 94 percent (Ganzevoort, 2005a,b). Perinatal mortality rates were isproportionately high in these growth-restricte neonates (Haa, 2007; Shear, 2005).

Following these experiences, expectant management became more commonly practice, with the caveat that women with HELLP synrome or growth-restricte etuses were usually exclue. More recently, a prospective comparative stuy reporte that expectant management o women with “stable” HELLP synrome at <34 weeks may benet mother an etus (Cavaignac-Vitalis, 2019). Te MEXPRE Latin Stuy was a multicenter trial that ranomly assigne 267 women with severe preeclampsia at 28 to 32 weeks’ gestation to prompt elivery or to expectant management (Vigil-De Gracia, 2013). Te perinatal mortality rate approximate 90 per 1000 in each group, an the composite neonatal morbiity outcome was not improve with expectant management. Conversely, etal-growth restriction—22 versus 9 percent—an placental abruption—7.6 versus 1.5 percent—were signicantly higher in the group manage expectantly.

Churchill an colleagues (2018) perorme a Cochrane Database review o six ranomize trials o interventionist versus expectant care or severe preeclampsia between 24 an 34 weeks. Teir review ha nings similar to those in able 41-3 an suggeste that expectant management was benecial to perinatal outcome. However, ata were insufcient to establish conclusions on maternal health.

Expectant Management of Midtrimester

Preeclampsia

Several small stuies have ocuse on expectant management o severe preeclampsia synrome beore 28 weeks’ gestation. In one review o eight such stuies, maternal complications were common among nearly 200 women with severe preeclampsia with an onset <26 complete weeks (Bombrys, 2009). Because no neonates survive when elivere beore 23 weeks, most experts recommen pregnancy termination in these cases. For women with slightly more avance pregnancies, however, the ecision is less clear. For example, at 23 weeks’ gestation, the perinatal survival rate was 18 percent, but long-term perinatal morbiity is yet unknown. For women with pregnancies at 24 to 26 weeks, perinatal survival approaches 60 percent, an it averages almost 90 percent or those at 26 weeks. As shown in Table 41-4, maternal complications—especially HELLP synrome—were commonplace an one mother ie. Perinatal mortality exceee 50 percent. At this time, no comparative stuies attest to perinatal benets o such expectant treatment versus early elivery in the ace o serious maternal complications, which approach rates o 50 percent.

Corticosteroids for Lung Maturation

o enhance etal lung maturation, glucocorticois have been aministere to women with severe hypertension who are remote rom term. reatment oes not seem to worsen maternal hypertension, an a lower incience o respiratory istress an improve etal survival rates have been cite. Tat sai, only one ranomize trial has evaluate corticosterois given to hypertensive women or etal lung maturation. Tis trial inclue 218 women who ha severe preeclampsia between 26 an 34 weeks’ gestation an who were ranomly assigne to betamethasone or placebo aministration (Amorim, 1999). Rates o neonatal complications that inclue respiratory istress, intraventricular hemorrhage, an eath were reuce signicantly when betamethasone was given compare with placebo. On the heavily weighted negative side, there were two maternal deaths and 18 stillbirths. We a these nings to buttress our unenthusiastic acceptance o attempts to prolong gestation in many o these women (Alexaner, 2015; Bloom, 2003).

Corticosteroids to Ameliorate HELLP Syndrome

Several observational stuies have inicate that corticosteroi therapy woul ameliorate acets o the HELLP synrome (AñezAguayo, 2018; Martin, 2016). Subsequently, at least three ran- omize trials aime to evaluate the benets o glucocorticois given to improve the laboratory abnormalities associate with HELLP synrome. Fonseca an associates (2005) ranomly assigne 132 women with HELLP synrome to either examethasone or placebo aministration. Outcomes assesse inclue hospitalization length, recovery time o abnormal laboratory test results, resolution o clinical parameters, an complications that inclue acute renal ailure, pulmonary eema, eclampsia, an eath. None o these was signicantly ierent between the two groups. In another stuy, 105 postpartum women with HELLP synrome were assigne to examethasone or placebo treatment. Katz an colleagues (2008) oun no avantage to examethasone (Fig. 41-1). In the thir stuy, preeclamptic women were given either placebo or methylprenisolone i their platelet count was between 50,000 an 150,000/μL (Pourrat, 2016). Again, no benets were gaine rom corticosteroi therapy. A Bolivian stuy i show benets rom corticosteroi therapy, however, it was not ranomize (Añez-Aguayo, 2018).

Because o these nings, the 2013 ask Force oes not recommen corticosteroi treatment to improve thrombocytopenia with HELLP synrome.

■ Expectant Management Recommendations

aken in toto, these stuies o not show overwhelming benets o expectant management o severe preeclampsia in women with gestations rom 24 to 32 weeks compare with maternal risks. Despite these caveats, the Society or Maternal-Fetal Meicine (2011) has etermine that such management is a reasonable alternative in selecte women with severe preeclampsia beore 34 weeks (Fig. 41-2). Te ask Force (2013) supports this recommenation. As shown in Table 41-5, such management calls or inpatient maternal an etal surveillance with elivery prompte by evience or worsening severe preeclampsia or maternal or etal compromise. Although attempts are mae or vaginal elivery in most cases, the likelihoo o cesarean elivery rises with ecreasing gestational age.

Our view is more conservative. Unoubtely, the overri- ing reason to terminate pregnancies with severe preeclampsia is maternal saety. Inee, it seems obvious that a elay to prolong gestation in women with severe preeclampsia may have serious maternal consequences. Tese observations are even more pertinent when consiere with the absence o convincing evience that perinatal outcomes are markely improve by the average prolongation o pregnancy by approximately 1 week. I unertaken, the caveats that manate elivery shown in able 41-5 shoul be strictly heee.

■ Experimental Therapies

In preliminary stuies, therapies have been use to lower serum levels o antiangiogenic actors in hopes to mitigate their averse actions. Some o these inclue therapeutic apheresis to lower sFlt-1 levels (Tahani, 2016; Winkler, 2018). Another novel therapy uses RNA molecules to silence placental sFlt-1 (uranov, 2018). Te proton-pump inhibitor esomeprazole was stuie in women with early-onset preeclampsia (Cluver, 2018). Sildenafl citrate, a phosphoiesterase inhibitor, has been provie to promote vasoilation (rapani, 2016; Vigil-De Gracia, 2016).

Other stuies compare recombinant antithrombin inusion with placebo (Paias, 2020). In general, none o these therapies has shown promise.

SEVERE PREECLAMPSIA AND ECLAMPSIA

Classication o preeclampsia with severe eatures is summarize in able 40-2 (p. 690). Briey, eatures inclue systolic bloo pressure ≥160 mm Hg or iastolic pressure ≥110 mm Hg; liver erangement with transaminitis; thrombocytopenia; renal insufciency; pulmonary eema; new-onset heaache; or visual changes. Eclampsia is ene by new-onset tonic-clonic, ocal, or multiocal seizures in the absence o other causes.

■ Eclampsia

Te evelopment o eclampsia appreciably raises the risk to mother an etus (Fishel-Bartal, 2020). In an earlier report, Mattar an Sibai (2000) escribe outcomes in 399 consecutive women with eclampsia rom 1977 through 1998. Major maternal complications inclue placental abruption—10 percent, neurological ecits—7 percent, aspiration pneumonia—7 percent, pulmonary eema—5 percent, cariopulmonary arrest— 4 percent, an acute kiney injury (AKI)—4 percent. Moreover, 1 percent o these women ie. Several subsequent reports similarly escribe excessive maternal morbiity an mortality rates with eclampsia that also inclue HELLP synrome, pulmonary embolism, an stroke (Anersgaar, 2006; Knight, 2007).

Almost without exception—but at times unnotice— preeclampsia precees convulsions. Eclampsia is most common in the last trimester an becomes increasingly requent as term approaches. Postpartum, the incience o eclampsia has ecline uring the past ecae. Improve access to prenatal care, earlier etection o antepartum preeclampsia, an prophylactic use o magnesium sulate are explanations (Chames, 2002). Other iagnoses shoul be consiere in women with convulsions more than 48 hours postpartum or in women with ocal neurological ecits, prolonge coma, or atypical eclampsia.

■ Clinical Findings with Eclampsia

Eclamptic seizures may be violent, an the woman must be protecte, especially her airway. So orceul are the muscular movements that the woman may throw hersel out o her be, an i not protecte, her tongue is bitten by the violent action o the jaws (Fig. 41-3). Tis phase, in which the muscles alternately contract an relax, may last approximately a minute. Graually, the muscular movements become smaller an less requent, an nally the woman lies motionless. Ater a seizure, the woman is postictal, but in some, a coma o variable uration ensues. When the convulsions are inrequent, the woman usually recovers some egree o consciousness ater each attack. As the woman arouses, a semiconscious combative state may ensue. In severe cases, coma persists rom one convulsion to another, an eath may result.

Rarely, a single convulsion may be ollowe by coma rom which the woman may never emerge. As a rule, however, eath oes not occur until ater requent convulsions. Last, an also rarely, convulsions continue unabate—status epilepticus—an require eep seation an even general anesthesia to obviate anoxic encephalopathy.

Te respiratory rate ater an eclamptic convulsion usually rises an may reach 50 or more per minute in response to hypercarbia, lactic aciemia, an transient hypoxia. Cyanosis may be observe in severe cases. High ever is a grave sign as it likely emanates rom cerebrovascular hemorrhage.

Proteinuria is usually present, an a ourth o women with severe preeclampsia have some egree o AKI (Roriguez, 2021).

Urine output may be iminishe appreciably, an occasionally anuria evelops. Hemoglobinuria may be seen, but hemoglobinemia is rare. Eema may be pronounce (Fig. 41-4). With severe preeclampsia, urinary output rises ater elivery an is usually an early sign o improvement. With renal ysunction, serum creatinine levels are serially monitore.

Proteinuria an eema orinarily isappear within a week postpartum. In most cases, bloo pressure returns to normal within a ew ays to 2 weeks ater elivery (Berks, 2009). As subsequently iscusse, persisting an severe hypertension likely pre- icts unerlying chronic vascular isease.

In antepartum eclampsia, labor may begin spontaneously shortly ater convulsions ensue an may progress rapily. I the seizures evelop uring labor, contractions may increase in requency an intensity, an the uration o labor may be shortene. Because o maternal hypoxemia an lactic aciemia cause by convulsions, etal braycaria oten ollows a seizure (Fig. 41-5). In our experiences, the etal heart rate usually recovers within 2 to 10 minutes. I it persists more than 10 minutes, another cause o braycaria, such as placental abruption, shoul be consiere.

Pulmonary eema may ollow shortly ater eclamptic convulsions or several hours later. Tis complication is urther explore on page 724.

Occasionally, suen eath occurs synchronously with an eclamptic seizure, or it ollows shortly thereater. Most oten in these cases, a massive cerebral hemorrhage is the cause (Fig. 40-11, p. 700). Hemiplegia may result rom sublethal hemorrhage. Cerebral hemorrhages are more likely in oler women with unerlying chronic hypertension. For women with a neurological ecit ater an eclamptic seizure, consieration is given or emergent cranial compute tomography (C) scanning. Up to 5 percent o women with eclampsia have altere consciousness, incluing persistent coma, ollowing a seizure. Tis may be ue to extensive cerebral eema, an associate transtentorial herniation may cause eath (Cunningham, 2000). In approximately 10 percent o eclamptic women, some egree o blin- ness ollows a seizure. Te causes o impaire vision which usually improves postpartum, are iscusse in Chapter 40 (p. 701)

Rarely, eclampsia is ollowe by psychosis, an the woman becomes violent. Tis may last or several ays to 2 weeks. Te prognosis or return to normal unction is goo, provie mental illness was not preexisting. It is presume to be similar to postpartum psychosis iscusse in Chapter 64 (p. 1148). Antipsychotic meications have been eective in the ew cases o posteclampsia psychosis treate at Parklan Hospital.

Generally, eclampsia is more likely to be iagnose too requently rather than overlooke. Epilepsy, encephalitis, meningitis, brain tumor, neurocysticercosis, amnionic ui embolism, postural puncture cephalalgia, an rupture cerebral aneurysm uring late pregnancy or in the puerperium may simulate eclampsia. Until other such causes are exclue, however, all pregnant women with convulsions shoul be consiere to have eclampsia. As a pragmatic rule, loaing with magnesium sulate shoul be consiere while alternate iagnoses are explore.

MANAGEMENT OF SEVERE PREECLAMPSIA-ECLAMPSIA

Most eclampsia regimens in the United States adhere to a similar philosophy:

• Control or prevent convulsions using an intravenous loading dose of magnesium sulfate. This is followed by maintenance fosing, usually given intravenously

• Provide intermittent antihypertensive medication to lower dangerously high blood pressure

• Avoid diuretics unless pulmonary edema is obvious; limit intravenous fluid administration unless fluid loss is excessive; and avoid hyperosmotic agents

• Deliver the fetus to resolve preeclampsia.

■ Magnesium Sulfate

This parenterally administered agent is an effective anticonvulsant and avoids producing central nervous system depression. It may be given intravenously by continuous inusion or intramuscularly by intermittent injection (Table 41-6). A thir option is intermittent, intravenous, 2-g injections (Easterling, 2018). Dosages or severe preeclampsia mirror those or eclampsia. Because labor an elivery is a more likely time or seizures to evelop, women with severe preeclampsia or eclampsia usually are given magnesium sulate uring labor an or 24 hours postpartum. In the Unite States, magnesium sulate is almost universally aministere intravenously. O concern, magnesium sulate solutions, although inexpensive to prepare, are not reaily available in all parts o the eveloping worl.

Even i solutions are available, the technology to inuse them may not be. Tus, the rug can be aministere intramuscularly, an this is as eective as intravenous inusion (Pritchar, 1955, 1975, 1984; Salinger, 2013). Magnesium sulate is not given to treat hypertension. Magnesium ion most likely exerts a specic anticonvulsant action on the cerebral cortex. ypically, the mother stops convulsing ater the initial 4-g loaing ose. By an hour or two, she regains consciousness sufciently to be oriente to place an time.

Te magnesium sulate osage regimens presente in able 41-6 usually result in increase plasma magnesium levels. Data rom Brookel an associates (2016) are illustrate in Figure 41-6. When magnesium sulate is given to arrest an eclamptic seizure, up to 15 percent o women will have a subsequent convulsion. I so, an aitional 2-g ose o magnesium sulate in a 20-percent solution is slowly aministere intravenously. In a small woman, this aitional 2-g ose may be use once, but it can be given twice i neee in a larger woman. In only 5 o 245 women with eclampsia at Parklan Hospital was it necessary to use alternative supplementary anticonvulsant meication to control seizures (Pritchar, 1984). For these, a small ose o a short-acting benzoiazepine such as miazolam or lorazepam is given intravenously. Teir prolonge use is avoie because o an associate higher mortality rate rom aspiration pneumonia (Royal College o Obstetricians an Gynaecologists, 2006).

Maintenance magnesium sulate therapy has traitionally been continue or 24 hours ater elivery. For eclampsia that evelops postpartum, magnesium sulate is aministere or 24 hours ater the onset o convulsions. A ew investigators have truncate this therapy uration to 12 hours an reporte no seizures (Anjum, 2016; Ehrenberg, 2006; Kashanian, 2016).

Outcomes have also been reporte when magnesium sulate therapy was stoppe ater elivery (Lumir, 2017; Vigil-De Gracia, 2018). Tese stuies are relatively small, an the abbreviate magnesium sulate regimens nee urther stuy beore being routinely implemente.

Pharmacology and Toxicology

Parenterally aministere magnesium is cleare almost totally by renal excretion, an magnesium clearance rate is approximately a thir o glomerular ltration rate (GFR) etermine by creatinine clearance. Magnesium intoxication is unusual when the GFR is normal or only slightly reuce. Aequate urine output usually correlates with preserve GFR. Tat sai, magnesium excretion is not urine ow epenent, an urinary volume per unit time oes not, per se, preict renal unction. Tus, serum creatinine levels must be measured to confrm a decreased GFR.

Eclamptic convulsions are almost always prevente or arreste by plasma magnesium levels maintaine at 4 to 7 mEq/L, 4.8 to 8.4 mg/L, or 2.0 to 3.5 mmol/L. However, one review o magnesium pharmacokinetics showe that most regimens result in much lower serum magnesium levels (Okusanya, 2016). Tis was especially true i only 1 g/hr was inuse (Yeet, 2017).

Importantly, the obesity epiemic has aecte these observations (Cunningham, 2016). uela an colleagues (2013) escribe our results rom Parklan Hospital with magnesium aministration to obese women. More than 60 percent o women who ha a boy mass inex (BMI) >30 kg/m2 an who were receiving a 2-g/hr ose ha subtherapeutic levels at 4 hours. Tus, most obese women woul require 3 g/hr to maintain eective plasma levels. Tat sai, most currently o not recommen routine magnesium level measurements (American College o Obstetricians an Gynecologists, 2020a; Royal College o Obstetricians an Gynaecologists, 2006). Patellar reexes isappear when the plasma magnesium level reaches 10 mEq/L—approximately 12 mg/L—presumably because o a curariorm action. Tis sign serves to warn o impening magnesium toxicity. When plasma levels rise above 10 mEq/L, breathing weakens. At 12 mEq/L or higher levels, respiratory paralysis an respiratory arrest ollow (Somjen, 1966). reating with calcium gluconate or calcium chloride, 1 g intravenously, coupled with magnesium sulate discontinuation, usually reverses mild to moderate respiratory depression. One o these agents shoul be reaily available whenever magnesium is being inuse. Unortunately, the eects o intravenously aministere calcium may be short-live i a steay-state toxic magnesium level has been reache. For severe respiratory epression an arrest, prompt tracheal intubation an mechanical ventilation are liesaving. Direct toxic eects on the myocarium rom high levels o magnesium sulate are uncommon (Morisaki, 2000).

Because magnesium is cleared almost exclusively by renal excretion, our described dosages o magnesium sulate will become excessive i the GFR is substantially decreased. Te initial 4- or 6-g loaing ose o magnesium sulate can be saely aministere regarless o renal unction. It is important to aminister the stanar loaing ose an not to reuce it. A loaing ose achieves the esire therapeutic level, an the inusion maintains the steay-state level. Tus, only the maintenance inusion rate should be altered or those with a diminished GFR. Renal function is estimated by measuring plasma creatinine. Whenever plasma creatinine levels are >1.0 mg/mL, serial serum magnesium levels are determined to guide the infusion rate (American College o Obstetricians an Gynecologists, 2020a).

Ater a 4-g intravenous ose is aministere uring 15 minutes, mean arterial pressure alls slightly an is accompanie by a 13-percent rise in cariac inex (Cotton, 1986b). Tus,

magnesium lowers systemic vascular resistance an mean arterial pressure. At the same time, cariac output is increase.

Tese nings are coinciental with transient nausea an ushing, an the cariovascular eects persist or only 15 minutes espite continue magnesium inusion. Magnesium-inuce vasoilation is weaker in placental vessels because o iminishe calcium-channel activity (ang, 2018).

Turnau an coworkers (1987) showe that magnesium therapy le to a small but signicant rise in the cerebrospinal ui’s total magnesium concentration. Te magnitue was irectly proportional to the corresponing serum concentration.

Other Effects

Magnesium has anticonvulsant an neuroprotective eects in animal moels. Some propose mechanisms o action inclue: (1) reuce presynaptic release o the neurotransmitter glutamate, (2) blockae o glutamatergic N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors, (3) potentiation o aenosine action, (4) improve calcium buering by mitochonria, an (5) blockage o calcium entry via voltage-gate channels (Arango, 2008; Wang, 2012).

In the uterus, relatively high serum magnesium concentrations epress myometrial contractility. Inhibition o uterine contractility is magnesium ose epenent, an serum levels o at least 8 to 10 mEq/L are neee to inhibit uterine contractions (WattMorse, 1995). With the suggeste magnesium sulate regimens or seizure prevention, prolonge myometrial epression has not been observe. A transient ecline in activity uring an imme- iately ater the initial intravenous loaing ose can be seen (Leveno, 1998; Witlin, 1997). Bloo loss at elivery is not increase by stanar magnesium sulate treatment (Graham, 2016).

■ Neuroprophylaxis—Prevention of Seizures

Several randomized trials have tested the efficacy of seizure prophylaxis for women with gestational hypertension, with or without proteinuria. In all, magnesium sulfate was superior to the comparator agent to prevent eclampsia. Four of the larger stud- ies are summarized in Table 41-7. In the study from Parkland Hospital, magnesium sulfate therapy was superior to phenytoin to prevent seizures in women with gestational hypertension or preeclampsia (Lucas, 1995). In another study, magnesium sulfate and nimodipine, which is a calcium-channel blocking drug with specific cerebral vasodilator activity, were compared in 1650 women with severe preeclampsia (Belort, 2003). The rate of eclampsia was more than threefold higher for women allocated to the nimodipine group—2.6 versus 0.8 percent.

The largest comparative study was Magnesium Sulfate for Prevention of Eclampsia reported by the Magpie trial Collaboration Group (2002). More than 10,000 women with severe preeclampsia from 33 countries were randomly allocated to treatment with magnesium sulfate or placebo. Women given magnesium had a 58-percent significantly lower risk of eclampsia than those given placebo. Maternal mortality and placental abruption rates also were decreased. Child behavior at 18 months did not differ between groups (Smyth, 2009).

Who Should Be Given Magnesium Sulfate?

Magnesium will prevent proportionately more seizures in women with correspondingly worse disease. However, severity is difficult to quantity, and thus deciding which woman might benefit most from neuroprophylaxis is sometimes diffifcult. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2020a) recommends that women with either eclampsia or severe preeclampsia should be given magnesium sulfate prophylaxis. Again, criteria that establish “severity” are not universal. Tus, the conunrum is whether women with “nonsevere” gestational hypertension or preeclampsia shoul receive magnesium neuroprophylaxis. We oun that approximately 1 woman in 100 who has nonsevere preeclampsia but who is not given magnesium sulate prophylaxis can be expecte to have a seizure.

A fourth of these women likely will require emergent cesarean delivery and be exposed to the attendant maternal and perinatal morbidity from general anesthesia. From this, the major question regarding management of nonsevere gestational hypertension remains whether it is acceptable to avoid unnecessary treatment of 99 women to risk eclampsia in one. The answer appears to be yes, as suggested by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2020a). At Parkland Hospital, our policy is to give magnesium neuroprophylaxis to women with preeclampsia with severe features, and conservatively to those with proteinuria hypertension (Table 40-1, p. 689).

Fetal and Neonatal Effects

Magnesium administered parenterally promptly crosses the placenta to achieve equilibrium in fetal serum and less so in amnionic fluid (Gortzak-Uzan, 2005; Narasimhulu, 2017). Magnesium sulfate has small but significant effects on the fetal heart rate pattern and specifically on beat-to-beat variability (Hallak, 1999). One study showed a lower baseline heart rate that was within the normal range; Decreased variability; and fewer prolonged decelerations (Duy, 2012).

Overall, maternal magnesium therapy appears safe for perinates (Drassinower, 2015). One study of more than 1500 exposed preterm neonates found no association between the need for neonatal resuscitation and cord blood magnesium levels (Johnson, 2012). Still, a few neonatal adverse events are associated with its use. In a Parkland Hospital study of 6654 mostly term, exposed newborns, 6 percent had hypotonia (Abbassi-Ghanavati, 2012). In addition, exposed neonates had lower 1- and 5-minute Apgar scores, a higher intubation rate, and more admissions to the special care nursery. Neonatal depression occurs only if hypermagnesemia at delivery is severe.

Observational studies suggest a protective effect of magnesium against the development of cerebral palsy in very-lowbirthweight newborns (Crowther, 2017). These beneficial effects may extend to growth-restricted fetuses. Randomized trials have also assessed neuroprotective effects for preterm neonates, and findings are discussed in Chapter 45 (p. 803). One review expanded this possibility to include term newborns, but data were insuficient to draw conclusions (Nguyen, 2013).

Maternal Safety and Efficacy

The multinational Eclampsia trial Collaborative Group study (1995) involved 1687 women with eclampsia randomly allocated to one of three different anticonvulsant regimens: magnesium sulfate, diazepam, or phenytoin (Table 41-8). In aggregate, magnesium sulfate therapy was associated with a significantly lower incidence of recurrent seizures (9.7 percent) compared with women given phenytoin (28 percent) or diazepam (17 percent). Moreover, the aggregate maternal death rate of 3.2 percent with magnesium sulfate was significantly lower than that of 5.2 percent for the other two regimens.

■ Severe Hypertension Treatment

Dangerous hypertension can cause cerebrovascular hemorrhage and hypertensive encephalopathy, and it can trigger eclamptic convulsions. Other complications are placental abruption and congestive heart failure induced by elevated hypertensive aterloa. Studies highlight the importance of treating systolic hypertension when blood pressures are >160 mm Hg (Juy, 2019; Martin, 2005, 2016).

Because o these serious sequelae, the Working Group or the National High Bloo Pressure Eucation Program (2000) an the American College o Obstetricians an Gynecologists (2020a) recommen treatment to lower systolic pressures to a level ≤160 mm Hg an iastolic pressures to ≤110 mm Hg. Lower iastolic pressures can compromise placental perusion.

From other observations, it seems likely that at least hal o serious hemorrhagic strokes associate with preeclampsia are in women with chronic hypertension (Cunningham, 2005; Zokie, 2018). Long-staning hypertension results in evelopment o Charcot–Bouchard aneurysms in the eep penetrating arteries o the lenticulostriate branch o the mile cerebral arteries. Tese vessels supply the basal ganglia, putamen, thalamus, ajacent eep white matter, pons, an eep cerebellum.

Tese unique aneurysmal weakenings preispose these small arteries to rupture uring suen hypertensive episoes. Several rugs are available to rapily lower angerously elevate bloo pressure in women with pregnancy-associate hypertension. Hyralazine, labetalol, an nieipine are recommene as rst-line agents by the American College o Obstetricians an Gynecologists (2020a). Evience supports their value to ecrease stroke risk (Cleary, 2018).

All three agents have equivalent efcacy. Comparative stu- ies o hyralazine an labetalol show similar results (Mable, 1987; Umans, 2015). Hyralazine causes signicantly more maternal tachycaria an palpitations, whereas labetalol more requently leas to maternal hypotension an braycaria. Ran- omize trials that compare nieipine with labetalol oun neither rug enitively superior, but nieipine lowere bloo pressure more quickly (Gainer, 2019; Zuleen, 2019). Both rugs are associate with a reuce requency o etal heart rate accelerations (Cahill, 2013). Last, a stuy comparing nieipine an hyralazine showe similar efcacy (Sharma, 2017).

A ew other generally available antihypertensive agents have been teste in clinical trials but are not wiely use (Umans, 2015). Tese inclue verapamil, nitroglycerin, nitroprussie, ketanserin, nicaripine, an nimoipine (Belort, 2003; Cornette, 2016). Experimental antihypertensive rugs may eventually be useul or preeclampsia treatment (Lam, 2013).

Hydralazine

Tis antihypertensive agent is aministere intravenously or intramuscularly. An initial 5- to 10-mg ose can act as rapily as 10 minutes. I neee, this is ollowe by 10-mg oses at 15- to 20-minute intervals until a satisactory response is achieve (Table 41-9). Although we will aminister a thir ose, the American College o Obstetricians an Gynecologists (2020a) recommens labetalol therapy i severe hypertension persists ater the secon ose. Another regimen continuously inuses hyralazine at a rate o 0.5 to 10 mg/hr.

For higher bloo pressures, the tenency to give a larger initial ose o hyralazine shoul be avoie. Te response to 5- to 10-mg oses cannot be preicte by hypertension severity. Tus, our protocol is to always aminister 5 mg as the initial ose. An averse response to exceeing this initial ose is shown in Figure 41-7. Tis woman ha chronic hypertension complicate by severe superimpose preeclampsia, an hyralazine was injecte more requently than recommene. Her bloo pressure in less than 1 hour roppe rom 270/150 mm Hg to 110/80 mm Hg. Fetal heart rate ecelerations characteristic o uteroplacental insufciency became evient. Decelerations persiste until her bloo pressure was raise with rapi crystalloi inusion. In some cases, this etal response to iminishe uterine perusion may be conuse with placental abruption an may result in unnecessary an potentially angerous emergency cesarean elivery.

Labetalol

Tis eective intravenous antihypertensive agent is an α- an nonselective β-blocker. Some preer its use to hyralazine because o ewer sie eects. Importantly, labetalol is usually not given to asthmatic women. At Parklan Hospital, we give 10 mg intravenously initially. I bloo pressure has not ecline to suitable levels in 10 minutes, 20 mg is given. Te next 10-minute incremental ose is 40 mg an is ollowe by another 40 mg i neee. I a salutary response is not achieve, an 80-mg ose is provie (see able 41-9). Te American College o Obstetricians an Gynecologists (2020a) recommens starting with a 10- to 20-mg intravenous bolus.

I not eective, this is ollowe by 20 to 80 mg every 10 to 30 minutes. I hypertension persists, hyralazine is then given.

Nifedipine

Tis calcium-channel blocking agent is given initially as a 10- to 20-mg oral ose o immeiate release meication. I necessary ater 20 minutes, a 10- to 20-mg oral ose is repeate. With an unsatisactory response, labetalol is provie. Niedipine given sublingually is no longer recommended. Tis route is associate with angerously rapi an extensive eects.

Diuretics

Potent loop iuretics can urther compromise placental per- usion. Immeiate eects inclue reistribution o intravascular volume, which most oten is alreay reuce in severe preeclampsia (p. 724). Tus, beore elivery, iuretics are not use to lower bloo pressure (Zeeman, 2009; Zonervan, 1988). Furosemie or similar rugs are use beore elivery solely to treat pulmonary eema. Discusse on page 725, they may have a role in treatment o postpartum hypertension.

■ Fluid Therapy

Crystalloi solution is aministere routinely at a rate between 60 an 125 mL per hour, unless ui loss is unusual rom vomiting, iarrhea, iaphoresis, or excessive bloo loss. Oliguria is common with severe preeclampsia. Couple with the knowlege that maternal bloo volume is likely constricte compare with that o normal pregnancy, it is tempting to aminister intravenous uis more vigorously. However, controlle, conservative ui aministration is preerre or the typical woman with severe preeclampsia. Tese gravias alreay have excessive extracellular ui that has inappropriately extravasate rom the intravascular compartment. Inusion o large ui volumes enhances the malistribution an thereby elevates the risk o pulmonary an cerebral eema (Sciscioner, 2003; Zinaman, 1985). Tus, or preeclamptic women with anuria, small incremental boluses can be given to maintain urine output above 30 mL/hr. Diminishe intravascular volume rom hemorrhage or ui loss rom vomiting or ever can similarly be replace by graual incremental boluses o crystalloi.

For labor analgesia with neuraxial analgesia, crystalloi solutions are inuse slowly in grae amounts (Chap. 25, p. 479).

Pulmonary Edema

Women with severe preeclampsia who evelop pulmonary eema most oten o so postpartum (Cunningham, 1986, 2012). With pulmonary eema in the eclamptic woman, aspiration o gastric contents, which may be the result o convulsions, anesthesia, or overseation, shoul be exclue. Otherwise, in women with severe preeclampsia, three common causes o pulmonary eema are pulmonary capillary permeability eema, cariogenic eema, or their combination.

First, in women with preeclampsia, both increase capillary permeability an greater extravascular ui oncotic pressure are oun (Brown, 1989; Øian, 1986). I intravenous ui replacement is vigorous, pulmonary congestion can ollow.

Secon, in some women, pulmonary eema may be cause by ventricular ailure rom increase aterloa that results rom severe hypertension. Such pulmonary eema rom ventricular ailure is more common in morbily obese women an in those with chronic hypertension.

Invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring

Knowlege concerning cariovascular an hemoynamic pathophysiological alterations associate with severe preeclampsia–eclampsia has accrue rom stuies one using invasive monitoring an a pulmonary artery catheter (Fig. 40-5, p. 694). wo conitions requently cite as inications are preeclampsia associate with oliguria or with pulmonary eema (Clark, 2010). Somewhat ironically, it is usually vigorous treatment o the ormer that results in most cases o the latter. Te ask Force (2013) recommens against routine invasive monitoring. Tis is best reserve or women with severe preeclampsia an with accompanying cariac isease, renal isease, or both or with reractory hypertension, oliguria, an pulmonary eema. Preliminary ata rom stuies using a noninvasive cardiac monitoring system nee to be verie beore wiesprea clinical application (Lavie, 2018).

■ Plasma Volume Expansion

Because the preeclampsia syndrome is associated with hemoconcentration, some have infused various fluids, starch polymers, albumin concentrates, or combinations to expand blood volume. Older studies escribe serious complications—especially pulmonary edema—with volume expansion (Beneetti, 1985; Sibai, 1987b).

The Amsterdam randomized study reported by Ganzevoort and coworkers (2005a,b) was a well-designed investigation done to evaluate volume expansion. A total of 216 women with severe preeclampsia were enrolled between 24 and 34 weeks’ gestation. The study included women whose preeclampsia was complicated by HELLP syndrome, eclampsia, pulmonary edema, or fetal-growth restriction. In the group randomly assigned to volume expansion, each woman was given 250 mL o 6-percent hydroxyethyl starch infused over 4 hours twice daily. Pregnancy outcomes were compared with a control group, and none of these were significantly different. Importantly, serious maternal morbidity and a substantive perinatal mortality rate accompanied their expectant management.

■ Analgesia and Anesthesia

During the past 25 years, the use o neuraxial analgesia or women with preeclampsia synrome has prove ieal. Ran- omize stuies attest to its saety, an these trials are ully escribe in Chapter 25 (p. 478). Initial problems with neuraxial analgesia inclue hypotension an iminishe uterine perusion cause by sympathetic blockae in preeclamptic women, who alreay have attenuate hypervolemia. However, slow inuction o epiural analgesia with ilute solutions o anesthetic agents counter the nee or rapi inusion o large volumes o crystalloi or colloi to prevent maternal hypotension (Hogg, 1999; Wallace, 1995).

Importantly, epiural blockae avois general anesthesia, in which the stimulation o tracheal intubation may cause su- en severe hypertension. Such bloo pressure spikes can cause pulmonary eema, cerebral eema, or intracranial hemorrhage. Last, tracheal intubation may be particularly ifcult an thus hazarous in women with airway eema ue to preeclampsia (American College o Obstetricians an Gynecologists, 2020b).

Juicious ui aministration is essential in women with severe preeclampsia who receive regional analgesia. Vigorous crystalloi inusion with epiural blockae in women with severe preeclampsia elevates pulmonary capillary wege pressures (Newsome, 1986). Aggressive volume replacement in preeclamptic women raises their risk or pulmonary eema, especially in the rst 72 hours postpartum (Clark, 1985; Cotton, 1986a). Last, most cases o pharyngolaryngeal eema are relate to aggressive volume therapy (Heller, 1983). In sum, general anesthesia, epiural analgesia, or combine spinal-epiural analgesia are acceptable or women severe preeclampsia i steps are taken to ensure a careul approach to the selecte metho. At Parklan Hospital, a gentle bolus is given accompanying epiural placement (Chap. 25, p. 479).

■ Blood Loss at Delivery

Hemoconcentration or lack of normal pregnancy-induced hypervolemia is an almost predictable feature of severe preeclampsia–eclampsia (Fig. 40-7, p. 696) (Zeeman, 2009). These women, who consequently lack normal pregnancy hypervolemia, may poorly tolerate even normal blood loss. Thus, an appreciable fall in blood pressure soon after delivery most often means excessive blood loss and not sudden resolution of vasospasm and endothelial damage. When oliguria follows delivery, the hematocrit should be evaluated frequently to help detect excessive blood loss. If identified, hemorrhage should be treated appropriately by crystalloid and blood transfusion.

■ Persistent Severe Postpartum Hypertension 

Postpartum, 8 percent of women develop e novo hypertension (Goel, 2015). At times, controlling severe hypertension may be difficult or intravenous hydralazine or labetalol or oral immediate-release nifedipine are being used repeatedly. In these cases, oral maintenance regimens can be given. Examples include labetalol or another β-blocking agent; nifedipine extended release; amlodipine; or another calcium-channel blocking agent (Sharma, 2017). Women so treated are less likely to require readmission (Stamilio, 2021; Wen, 2019). The Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (2020a) has developed a check list for postpartum care of women with hypertensive disorders. Persistent hypertension is likely aggravated by pathological interstitial fluid that is now returning to the intravascular compartment, by underlying chronic hypertension, or by both (Sibai, 2012; an, 2002). Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs do not aggravate postpartum hypertension (Anastasio, 2018; Penel, 2019). In some women with chronic hypertension and left-ventricular hypertrophy, severe postpartum hypertension can cause pulmonary edema from cardiac failure (Cunningham, 1986, 2019; Sibai, 1987a).

Furosemide

Severe hypertension persists epening on the onset an length o extracellular ui mobilization an iuresis. Tus, it seems logical that urosemie-augmente iuresis might serve to hasten bloo pressure control (Ascarelli, 2005). In one ranomize trial o 384 women with hypertensive isorers o pregnancy, a cohort that receive urosemie postpartum ha signicantly lower bloo pressures at 7 ays—6 versus 14 percent—compare with women who receive placebo (Lopes Perigao, 2021). Te nee or antihypertensive treatment to be given at ischarge in the urosemie group also was signicantly reuce. In another ranomize stuy, women with severe postpartum preeclampsia receive nieipine plus urosemie or nieipine alone. Te urosemie regimen signicantly lowere the nee or aitional antihypertensive agents—8 versus 26 percent, respectively (Veena, 2017). Conversely, in one stuy, torsemide ha no signicant benets (Viteri, 2018).

We use a simple metho to estimate excessive extracellular ui. Te postpartum weight is compare with the most recent prenatal weight, either rom the last clinic visit or rom amission or elivery. ypically, soon ater elivery, maternal weight shoul be reuce by at least 10 to 15 pouns epening on newborn an placental weight, amnionic ui volume, an bloo loss. Because o various interventions, especially intravenous crystalloi inusions given with labor epiural analgesia or uring operative vaginal or cesarean elivery, women with severe preeclampsia oten have an immeiate postpartum weight in excess o their last prenatal weight. I this weight increase is associate with severe persistent postpartum hypertension, iuresis with intravenous urosemie can be helpul in controlling bloo pressure.

Thrombotic Microangiopathy

Occasionally, women have an atypical synrome in which severe preeclampsia–eclampsia persists espite elivery. Martin an associates (1995) escribe 18 such women whom they encountere uring a 10-year perio. Tey avocate single or multiple plasma exchange or these women. In some cases, 3 L o plasma was exchange three times beore a response was orthcoming. Tis is a 36- to 45-onor-unit exposure or each patient. Others have escribe plasma exchange perorme in postpartum women with HELLP synrome (Förster, 2002;

Obeiat, 2002). In all o these cases, however, the istinction between HELLP synrome an thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura or hemolytic uremic synrome was not clear (sai, 2016). In our experiences with more than 55,000 women with gestational hypertension among nearly 500,000 pregnancies care or at Parklan Hospital through 2021, we have encountere very ew women with persistent postpartum hypertension, thrombocytopenia, an renal ysunction who were iagnose as having a thrombotic microangiopathy (Dashe, 1998).

Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome

Tis is another cause o persistent hypertension, “thunerclap”

heaaches, seizures, an central nervous system nings. Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome is characterize by iuse segmental constriction o cerebral arteries an may be associate with ischemic an hemorrhagic strokes. Tis synrome has several inciting causes that inclue pregnancy an particularly preeclampsia (Ducros, 2012). It is more requent in women, an long-term sequelae are uncommon. However, in some cases, vasoconstriction may be so severe as to cause cerebral ischemia an inarction (Boitet, 2020). We have encountere only a ew women with a stroke cause by this arteriopathy (Zokie, 2019). Te most appropriate management is unclear (Cho, 2019).

LONG-TERM CONSEQUENCES

■ Future Pregnancies

Women with preeclampsia during an index pregnancy are at risk for hypertensive and other disorders in subsequent pregnancies and later in life (Wang, 2021). In some, but not all women, the risk for hypertension is higher in the first 6 months postpartum (Giorgione, 2021; Muler, 2021). Even in subsequent nonhypertensive pregnancies, women who had preterm preeclampsia have a higher risk for preterm birth and growth-restricted neonates (Connealy, 2014; Palatnik, 2016). Generally, the earlier preeclampsia is diagnosed during the index pregnancy, the greater the likelihood of recurrence. Women with preeclampsia near term had a recurrence risk of 23 percent, but nulliparas diagnosed with preeclampsia before 30 weeks had a recurrence risk as high as 40 percent (Bramham, 2011; Sibai 1986, 1991).

As perhaps expected, women with HELLP syndrome have a substantive risk for recurrence in subsequent pregnancies. Even if HELLP syndrome does not recur with subsequent pregnancies, again incidences of preterm delivery, fetal-growth restriction, placental abruption, and cesarean delivery are increased (Habli, 2009; Malmström, 2020).

■ Cardiovascular Morbidity

The preeclampsia syndrome is also a marker for subsequent long-term cardiovascular morbidity (Table 41-10) (Hamma, 2020; Stuart, 2018; Wang, 2021). Thus, women with hypertension identified during pregnancy should be evaluated during the first several months postpartum. Te Working Group o the NHBPEP (2000) conclue that hypertension attributable to pregnancy shoul resolve within 12 weeks o elivery, an hypertension persisting beyon this time is consiere chronic (Chap. 53, p. 944). Te Magpie rial Follow-Up Collaborative Group (2007) reporte that 20 percent o 3375 preeclamptic women seen at a meian o 26 months postpartum ha hypertension. From one metanaalysis, a 28-percent incience o hypertension was oun within 2 years o eliveries complicate by preeclampsia (Giorgione, 2021). From a Danish registry an ater a mean o almost 15 years, the incience o chronic hypertension was veol higher in those who ha gestational hypertension, ourol greater ater mil preeclampsia, an sixol higher ater severe preeclampsia compare with women without hypertension in pregnancy (Lykke, 2009).

Any hypertension uring pregnancy is a risk marker or car- iovascular morbiity in later lie (Wang, 2021). As shown in ata rom Brouwers an coworkers (2018), the risk is greater in women with recurrent preeclampsia (Table 41-11). In a stuy rom Icelan, the prevalence o ischemic heart isease—24 versus 15 percent, an o stroke—9.5 versus 6.5 percent, were increase in women who ha gestational hypertension compare with normotensive controls (Arnaottir, 2005). In a Sweish population stuy o more than 400,000 women, those with recurrent preeclampsia ha systolic ysunction an a greater incience o ischemic heart isease (Valensise, 2016).

Diastolic ysunction also is more common (Bokslag, 2018). Preeclampsia is also a risk or coronary artery calcication an iiopathic cariomyopathy (Gammill, 2018; White, 2016). Women who have preeclampsia an who evelop chronic hypertension later in lie have an increase ventricular mass inex beore they become hypertensive (Ghossein-Doha, 2013). Last, in at least some women with prior preeclampsia, hypertensive cariovascular pathologies appear to have begun near the time o their own births. A similar phenomenon is associate with preterm birth an with etal-growth isorers.

Other coactors or comorbiities are relate to acquisition o these long-term averse outcomes (Gastrich, 2012; Harskamp, 2007; Hermes, 2012; Spaan, 2012). Tese inclue the metabolic synrome, iabetes, obesity, yslipiemia, an atherosclerosis (Catzov, 2021; Cho, 2019; Kajantie, 2017). Women with pregnancy-associate hypertension are at increase risk or type 2 iabetes (Stuart, 2018). Preeclampsia preisposes or later iabetic retinopathy an retinal etachment (Auger, 2017; Beharier, 2016).

■ Renal Sequelae

Preeclampsia is a marker or subsequent renal isease. Almost 15 percent o women with prior preeclampsia have renal ysunction (Lopes van Balen, 2017). Tis may be relate to AKI associate with preeclampsia (Novotny, 2020; Roriquez, 2021). In a Danish stuy with more than a million women, the chronic renal isease rate was sixol greater in those who ha preeclampsia (Kristensen, 2019). These data need to be considered in light of the findings that 15 to 20 percent of women with preeclampsia who undergo renal biopsy have evidence of chronic renal disease (Chesley, 1978). In another long-term study, women with prior preeclampsia were significantly more likely to be chronically hypertensive—55 versus 7 percent—compared with control women. They also had higher peripheral vascular and renovascular resistance and decreased renal blood flow. These data do not permit conclusions as to cause versus effect (Spaan, 2009).

■ Central Nervous System Sequelae

Eclamptic seizures were once believed to have no significant longterm CNS sequelae. However, this likely is not the case (Bergman, 2021c; Teilen, 2016). Recall that almost all eclamptic women have multifocal areas of perivascular edema, and approximately a fourth also have areas of cerebral infarction (Zeeman, 2004). In several long-term studies in women with severe preeclampsia and eclampsia, white-matter lesions in the brain that followed eclamptic convulsions persist (Aukes, 2009, 2012). Specifically, with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, 40 percent of women with prior eclampsia had more numerous and larger aggregate white-matter lesions compared with 17 percent of normotensive control women. These white-matter lesions were also found in women with preeclampsia without convulsions (Aukes, 2012). Others found temporal lobe white-matter changes and reduced cortical volume in women with prior preeclampsia (Siepmann, 2017). In some, but not all studies, women with prior eclampsia had subjectively impaired cognitive functioning anf increased risk for dementia (Basit, 2018; Elharram, 2018). They also had a modest increase in the frequency of seizure disorders (Nerenberg, 2017). In another study, women with prior eclampsia had lower vision-related quality of life compared with control women (Wiegman, 2012)

Nhận xét