CHAPTER 1 • Guidelines to Fetal Imaging in the First Trimester
INTRODUCTION
In the late 1980s and early 1990s, ultrasound evaluation of the fetus at less than 16
weeks of gestation was made possible by the advent of high-resolution transvaginal
transducers.1–7 With the introduction of transvaginal ultrasound, several reports
evaluated the feasibility of this approach in the first trimester and demonstrated the
ability to assess normal and abnormal anatomy of the fetal brain, heart, kidneys, and
other organs.1–7 The observation of the relationship between the presence of increased
fluid in the fetal neck region in the first trimester and chromosomal abnormalities
resulted in the establishment of nuchal translucency (NT) as an ultrasound screening tool
for aneuploidy.8–10 Largely through the efforts of Dr. Nicolaides and his coworkers, the
NT measurement was standardized and a first trimester screening strategy program was
established.10–13 Consistency and reliability of NT was ensured through standardization
of measurement and with the establishment of quality assurance programs.14,15 Over the
past two decades, the first trimester NT ultrasound examination has evolved beyond
aneuploidy screening and now includes an evaluation of fetal anatomy in early gestation.
Recently published guidelines reflect this development.16,17 Familiarization with
existing standardization of measurements and with national/international guidelines is an
important step in the performance of the first trimester ultrasound examination. Given
that knowledge in this field is evolving at a rapid pace, we recommend that ultrasound
practitioners stay abreast of the literature on this subject. In this chapter, we present
information on standardization of ultrasound measurements in the first trimester and
report on existing guidelines. It is important to note that with new evidence, guidelines
change over time and the readers are encouraged to refer to the most current version as
reference.
DEFINITION OF TERMS
It is important to understand the various terms that are used in standardization ofultrasound practice. Guidelines, protocols, standards, and policies refer to the
ultrasound examination itself (the NT screening or the first trimester anatomy survey).
Certifications, credentialing, and qualifications refer to the personnel performing the
ultrasound examinations including physicians, sonographers, and allied health
personnel. Accreditation, on the other hand, refers to the ultrasound laboratory/unit
where the examination is performed and thus requires evaluation of the qualifications of
the personnel performing the ultrasound examination, the equipment that is being used
for the ultrasound examination, compliance with existing examination guidelines, and
quality assurance.
The last 20 years have shown that standardizing the approach to NT, nasal bone,
tricuspid regurgitation, and ductus venosus in the first trimester has increased the
reliability and reproducibility of these measurements.13 Recently published guidelines
on first trimester ultrasound incorporate the NT and emphasize the role that the first
trimester ultrasound plays in the assessment of fetal anatomy.16,17 In general, guidelines
are consensus based and reflect on the scientific evidence at the time of guideline
development. Guidelines reduce inappropriate variations in practice and provide a
more rational basis for study referral. Guidelines also, when appropriately developed,
provide a focus for quality control and a need for continuing medical education for the
personnel performing the ultrasound examination. Guidelines may also identify
shortcomings of scientific studies and suggest appropriate research topics on the
subject.
STANDARDIZATION OF MEASUREMENTS
Nuchal Translucency
NT is the sonographic appearance of a collection of fluid under the skin behind the fetal
neck and back in the first trimester of pregnancy.13,14 Appropriate training of
sonographers and physicians, and compliance with established standard ultrasound
techniques, is essential to ensure uniformity of NT measurements among various
operators.13 NT image criteria have been developed for adequate measurements (Fig.
1.1).14,18 Semi-automated methods of measuring NT thickness have also been developed
by several ultrasound manufacturers in order to reduce operator-dependent bias in NT
measurements (Fig. 1.2).19 Table 1.1 summarizes the essential criteria for an adequate
NT measurement. The role of NT in detecting fetal aneuploidies is discussed in Chapter
6.
Nasal Bones
The nasal bones are hypoplastic or not ossified in the majority of fetuses with trisomy
21 and other aneuploidies in early gestation (Fig. 1.3).13 Typically, one of the two nasal
bones is imaged in a midsagittal plane of the fetus in the first trimester. It is important to
note that the ultrasound assessment of the nasal bone is technically difficult and requiressubstantial expertise for optimal performance.20 The correct assessment of the nasal
bone was shown to improve the performance of combined first trimester screening for
Down syndrome.13 In the normal fetus between the 11th and early 12th week of
gestation, the nasal bone may appear poorly ossified or absent.14 In such cases, it is
recommended to repeat the measurement one week later.14 Table 1.2 summarizes the
essential criteria for an adequate nasal bone assessment in the first trimester.
Ductus Venosus
The ductus venosus is an important vessel in the fetus as it directs highly oxygenated
blood from the umbilical vein, through the foramen ovale and into the systemic arterial
circulation. Doppler waveforms of the ductus venosus primarily reflect right atrial
preload. Abnormalities in the Doppler waveforms of the ductus venosus in the first
trimester have been reported in association with fetal aneuploidies, cardiac defects, and
other adverse pregnancy outcomes.13 Ductus venosus waveforms can be assessed
qualitatively by observing the A-wave component of the Doppler spectrum, which
reflects the atrial kick portion of diastole. Normal ductus venosus Doppler waveforms
show a positive A-wave (Fig. 1.4), whereas the presence of an absent or reversed Awave defines abnormal ductus venosus waveforms. An alternative approach relies on
the quantification of the ductus venosus waveforms by using indices such as the
pulsatility index for veins as a continuous variable.14 We do not recommend routine
assessment of ductus venosus flow in all pregnancies, but rather in pregnancies at
increased risk for congenital heart disease or in pregnancies with an intermediate risk
for aneuploidy.14 Table 1.3 summarizes essential criteria for the adequate assessment of
ductus venosus Doppler waveforms.Figure 1.1: Midsagittal view of a fetus at 13 weeks of gestation showing the
nuchal translucency (NT) thickness measurement according to the
recommended standards as listed in Tables 1.1 and 1.7. The schematic
diagram in the figure shows the correct (C) and incorrect (A, B, D) placement
of the calipers for NT measurements. In this example the NT measurement is
2.2 mm.Figure 1.2: Midsagittal view of a fetus at 12 weeks of gestation showing the
semiautomatic measurement of the nuchal translucency (NT) thickness. In the
semiautomatic approach, the examiner places a box around the region of
interest (dash box) and the software recognizes the largest NT size and places
the calipers accordingly. This approach decreases the subjectivity of the
measurement and increases its accuracy. In this example the NT measurement
is 2.1 mm.
Table 1.1 • Criteria for the Standardized Measurement of Nuchal
Translucency (NT) According to the Fetal Medicine Foundation-United
Kingdom14
Gestational age should be between 11 and 13 +6 weeks.
The fetal crown-rump length should be between 45 and 84 mm.The magnification of the image should be such that the fetal head and
thorax occupy the whole screen.
A midsagittal view of the face should be obtained. This is defined by the
presence of the echogenic tip of the nose and rectangular shape of the
palate anteriorly, the translucent diencephalon in the center, and the nuchal
membrane posteriorly.
The fetus should be in a neutral position, with the head in line with the
spine.
Care must be taken to distinguish between fetal skin and amnion.
The widest part of translucency must always be measured.
Measurements should be taken with the inner border of the horizontal line
of the calipers placed on the line that defines NT thickness
It is important to turn the gain down to avoid the mistake of placing the
caliper on the fuzzy edge of the line.
More than one measurement must be taken and the maximum one that
meets all the above criteria should be recorded in the database.
The semi-automated technique may also be used.
Nuchal cord: Use the mean of NT from above and below the cord
Nicolaides KH. The fetal medicine foundation. Available from:
https://fetalmedicine.org. Accessed March 1, 2017.Figure 1.3: Midsagittal view of a fetus at 13 weeks of gestation showing the
display of the nasal bone according to the recommended standards as shown
in Table 1.2. Yellow calipers measure the nasal bone. Note the presence of
two other echogenic lines, superior to the nasal bone, representing the nasal
skin (short arrow) and the tip of the nose (long arrow).
Table 1.2 • Criteria for the Standardized Measurement of the Nasal Bone
(NB) According to the Fetal Medicine Foundation-United Kingdom14
Gestational age should be between 11 and 13 +6 weeks.
The magnification of the image should be such that the fetal head and
thorax occupy the whole screen.
A midsagittal view of the face should be obtained. This is defined by the
presence of the echogenic tip of the nose and rectangular shape of the
palate anteriorly, the translucent diencephalon in the center, and the nuchal
membrane posteriorly. Minor deviations from the exact midline plane would
cause non-visualization of the tip of the nose and visibility of the zygomatic
process of the maxilla.The ultrasound transducer should be held parallel to the direction of the
nose and should be gently tilted from side to side to ensure that the NB is
seen separate from the nasal skin.
The echogenicity of the NB should be greater than the skin overlying it. In
this respect, the correct view of the NB should demonstrate three distinct
lines: the first two lines are horizontal and parallel to each other; the top
line represents the skin and the bottom one the NB. A third line represents
the tip of the nose.
When the NB line appears as a thin line, less echogenic than the overlying
skin, it suggests that the NB is not yet ossified, and it is therefore
classified as being absent.
Nicolaides KH. The fetal medicine foundation. Available from:
https://fetalmedicine.org. Accessed March 1, 2017.
Tricuspid Regurgitation
Color and pulsed Doppler of the tricuspid valve can be obtained in the apical fourchamber view of the fetal heart by placing the color Doppler box and the pulsed
Doppler sample volume over the valve at the level of the annulus (Fig. 1.5). Tricuspid
regurgitation in the first trimester is a common finding in fetuses with aneuploidies
(trisomies 21, 18, and 13) and in those with major congenital heart malformations.14
Trivial tricuspid regurgitation, defined by the presence of a small regurgitant jet at the
valve annulus, is a common finding in the first trimester and has been reported in the
majority of normal fetuses.21 Table 1.4 lists essential criteria for defining tricuspid
regurgitation in screening for fetal aneuploidy and congenital heart disease. Tricuspid
regurgitation, as defined in Table 1.4, is found in about 1% of euploid fetuses, in 55%
of fetuses with trisomy 21, and in one-third of fetuses with trisomy 18 and trisomy 13.14
Similar to the ductus venosus, we do not recommend routine assessment of the tricuspid
valve for tricuspid regurgitation in all pregnancies, but rather in pregnancies at
increased risk for congenital heart disease or in pregnancies with an intermediate risk
for aneuploidy.14
PRACTICE GUIDELINES FOR THE PERFORMANCE
OF THE FIRST TRIMESTER OBSTETRIC
ULTRASOUND EXAMINATION
Practice guidelines in ultrasound imaging are created to better define an ultrasound
examination and to provide for more standardization in its indications, approach, and
content. Typically practice guidelines are evidence based and consensus driven. There
are two types of ultrasound examinations in obstetrics—screening or routineexaminations that are offered to all pregnant women irrespective of risk and targeted
examinations that are indication driven and offered to pregnant women with increased
risk. The second trimester morphology ultrasound examination has become a screening
examination in most countries and is offered routinely to all pregnant women. The fetal
echocardiogram, on the other hand, is a targeted ultrasound examination that is offered
to pregnant women at increased risk for congenital heart disease. The first trimester
ultrasound examination is now considered a screening examination in many countries
but is still indication driven in others.22 As more data accumulate on the value of the
first trimester ultrasound in the assessment of fetal malformations, and more expertise
develops in the performance of the examination, the authors believe that the first
trimester ultrasound examination will be routinely offered to all pregnant women where
local resources allow. The role of the first trimester ultrasound is evolving from
pregnancy dating and aneuploidy screening to the first look at fetal anatomy to detect
major malformations. Guidelines for the performance of the first trimester ultrasound
were published recently. In the following sections, we present highlights of existing first
trimester ultrasound guidelines from the International Society of Ultrasound in
Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG), the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine
(AIUM), and the German Society of Ultrasound in Medicine (DEGUM).16,17,23Figure 1.4: Parasagittal view of the abdomen and chest in color and pulsed
Doppler of a fetus at 13 weeks of gestation with the pulsed Doppler sample
volume placed at the ductus venosus. Note that the insonation angle is almost
parallel to the direction of blood flow in the ductus venosus (arrow). Criteria for
optimal display of ductus venosus Doppler waveforms are shown in Table 1.3.
A represents the atrial contraction phase of the cardiac cycle in the Doppler
waveform.
Table 1.3 • Criteria for the Standardized Measurement of the Ductus
Venosus (DV) flow According to the Fetal Medicine Foundation-United
Kingdom14Gestational age should be between 11 and 13 +6 weeks.
The examination should be undertaken during fetal quiescence
The magnification of the image should be such that the fetal head and
thorax occupy the whole screen.
A right ventral midsagittal view of the fetal trunk should be obtained and
color flow mapping should be undertaken to demonstrate the umbilical vein,
DV, and fetal heart.
The pulsed Doppler sample volume should be small (0.5–1.0 mm) to avoid
contamination from the adjacent veins, and it should be placed in the
yellowish aliasing area.
The insonation angle should be less than 30 degrees.
The filter should be set at a low frequency (50–70 Hz) so that the A-wave
is not obscured.
The sweep speed should be high (2–3 cm/s) so that the waveforms are
spread allowing better assessment of the A-wave.
The DV PIV is measured by the machine, after manual tracing of the
outline of the waveform.
Nicolaides KH. The fetal medicine foundation. Available from:
https://fetalmedicine.org. Accessed March 1, 2017.
PIV, pulsatility index for veins.Figure 1.5: Axial plane of the fetal chest in a fetus at 13 weeks of gestation
showing placement of the pulsed Doppler sample volume for tricuspid Doppler
flow assessment. Note that the sample volume is placed over the valve to cover
inflow and regurgitation when present. In this example, there is no tricuspid
regurgitation in systole (double arrow) and the Doppler spectrum is normal with
E corresponding to early diastole and A corresponding to the atrial kick portion
of diastole. Criteria for pulsed Doppler of the tricuspid valve are shown in Table
1.4. RV, right ventricle.
First Trimester Ultrasound—Guidelines from the International
Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
The ISUOG published in 2013 the practice guidelines for the performance of the firsttrimester ultrasound scan.16 These guidelines are comprehensive and discuss the early
dating scan before 11 weeks of gestation, the aneuploidy screening with NT
measurement, and the anatomic survey.16
Table 1.4 • Criteria for the Standardized Measurement of the Tricuspid
Flow According to the Fetal Medicine Foundation-United Kingdom14
Gestational age should be between 11 and 13 +6 weeks.
The magnification of the image should be such that the fetal thorax
occupies most of the image.
An apical four-chamber view of the fetal heart should be obtained.
A pulsed-wave Doppler sample volume of 2.0 to 3.0 mm should be
positioned across the tricuspid valve so that the angle to the direction of
flow is less than 30 degrees from the direction of the interventricular
septum.
Tricuspid regurgitation is diagnosed if it is found during at least half of the
systole and with a velocity of over 60 cm/s, because aortic or pulmonary
arterial blood flow at this gestation can produce a maximum velocity of 50
cm/s.
The sweep speed should be high (2–3 cm/s) so that the waveforms are
widely spread for better assessment.
The tricuspid valve could be insufficient in one or more of its three cusps,
and therefore the sample volume should be placed across the valve at
least three times, in an attempt to interrogate the complete valve.
Nicolaides KH. The fetal medicine foundation. Available from:
https://fetalmedicine.org. Accessed March 1, 2017.
Purpose of the First Trimester Ultrasound Scan
ISUOG guidelines describe the purpose of the first trimester ultrasound examination as
follows:
In early pregnancy, it is important to confirm viability, establish gestational age
accurately, determine the number of fetuses and, in the presence of a multiple
pregnancy, assess chorionicity and amnionicity. Towards the end of the first
trimester, the scan also offers an opportunity to detect gross fetal abnormalities
and, in health systems that offer first-trimester aneuploidy screening, measure the
nuchal translucency thickness (NT).
The guidelines also discuss the ultrasound equipment to be used (summarized in Table
1.5).Biometry
The minimal required biometric measurements according to ISUOG include the crownrump length, the biparietal diameter, or head circumference. Other measurements can
also be performed including the abdominal circumference (AC), the femur length (FL),
or others. Nomograms in the first trimester are currently available for most of the
biometric measurements that can be performed in the second trimester. ISUOG
guidelines state that there is no reason to measure the AC or FL as part of the routine
first trimester scan.16 The role of biometry and dating in the first trimester is discussed
in more detail in Chapter 4.
Table 1.5 • Requirements for the Ultrasound Equipment in First Trimester
Scanning According to the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics
and Gynecology (ISUOG)16
Real-time, gray-scale, two-dimensional (2D) ultrasound
Transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound transducers
Adjustable acoustic power output controls with output display standards
Freeze frame and zoom capabilities
Electronic calipers
Capacity to print/store images
Regular maintenance and servicing
Salomon LJ, Alfirevic Z, Bilardo CM, et al. ISUOG practice guidelines:
performance of first-trimester fetal ultrasound scan. Ultrasound Obstet
Gynecol. 2013;41:102–113.
Nuchal Translucency
ISUOG guidelines state the following regarding NT measurement in the first trimester:
A reliable and reproducible measurement of NT requires appropriate training. A
rigorous audit of operator performance and constructive feedback from assessors
has been established in many countries and should be considered essential for all
practitioners who participate in NT-based screening programs. However, even in
the absence of NT-based screening programs, qualitative evaluation of the nuchal
region of any fetus is recommended and, if it appears thickened, expert referral
should be considered.16
Assessment of Fetal Anatomy
ISUOG guidelines emphasize the importance of the early anatomic survey and present
the pros and cons of the first trimester ultrasound for fetal anatomy assessment. ISUOG
guidelines also state that advantages of the early anatomy scan include early detectionand exclusion of many major anomalies, early reassurance to at-risk mothers, earlier
genetic diagnosis, and easier pregnancy termination if appropriate.16 The limitations of
early anatomic assessment are also discussed in the ISUOG guidelines and include the
need for trained and experienced personnel, uncertain cost/benefit ratio, and the need
for a second trimester ultrasound, as some anomalies develop later on in pregnancy and
cannot be excluded early in gestation. Table 1.6 lists the fetal anatomic areas and
organs that can be assessed in the first trimester.
Table 1.6 • Suggested Anatomic Assessment at Time of 11 to 13 + 6-
week Scan According to the International Society of Ultrasound in
Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG)16
Anatomic Region What to Look for
Head Present, cranial bones, midline falx, choroid plexus
fill ventricles
Neck
Normal appearance, nuchal translucency thickness
(if accepted after informed consent and
trained/certified operator available)a
Face Eyes with lensa, nasal bonea, normal
profile/mandiblea, intact lipsa
Spine Vertebrae (longitudinal and axial)a, intact overlying
skina
Chest Symmetrical lung fields, no effusions or masses
Heart Cardiac regular activity, four symmetrical
chambersa
Abdomen Stomach present in left upper quadrant, bladdera,
kidneysa
Abdominal wall Normal cord insertion, no umbilical defects
Extremities Four limbs each with three segments, hands and
feet with normal orientationa
Placenta cord Size and texture
Cord Three-vessel corda
aOptional structures
Salomon LJ, Alfirevic Z, Bilardo CM, et al. ISUOG practice guidelines:performance of first-trimester fetal ultrasound scan. Ultrasound Obstet
Gynecol. 2013;41:102–113.
First Trimester Ultrasound—Guidelines from the American
Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine
As of the date of this writing, the AIUM does not have specific guidelines dedicated for
ultrasound in the first trimester. Ultrasound in the first trimester is discussed however in
the document on the Practice Parameter for the Performance of Obstetric Ultrasound
Examinations which is currently (2017) being revised.23 In this document the AIUM
states the following:
A standard obstetric sonogram in the first trimester includes evaluation of the
presence, size, location, and number of gestational sac(s). The gestational sac is
examined for the presence of a yolk sac and embryo/fetus. When an embryo/fetus
is detected, it should be measured and cardiac activity recorded by a 2-
dimensional video clip or M-mode imaging. Use of spectral Doppler imaging is
discouraged. The uterus, cervix, adnexa, and cul-de-sac region should be
examined.23
Table 1.7 • Parameters for Nuchal Translucency (NT) Measurements
According to Nuchal Translucency Quality Review and the American
Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine15
The margins of the NT edges must be clear enough for proper placement
of the calipers
The fetus must be in the midsagittal plane
The image must be magnified so that it is filled by the fetal head, neck, and
upper thorax
The fetal neck must be in a neutral position, not flexed, and not
hyperextended
The amnion must be seen as separate from the NT line
The “+” calipers on the ultrasound must be used to perform the NT
measurement
Electronic calipers must be placed on the inner borders of the nuchal line
space with none of the horizontal crossbar itself protruding into the space
The calipers must be placed perpendicular to the long axis of the fetus
The measurement must be obtained at the widest space of the NT
Cuckle H, Platt LD, Thornburg LL, et al. Nuchal Translucency QualityReview (NTQR) program: first one and half million results. Ultrasound
Obstet Gynecol. 2015;45:199–204.
The document also reports on NT screening as performed for individual risk assessment
for aneuploidy. The NT prerequisites as listed by the AIUM are shown in Table 1.7.
The AIUM document does not currently provide any details on the assessment of fetal
anatomy in the first trimester. Based upon the existing practice parameter for obstetric
ultrasound examination, the AIUM recommends that the first trimester ultrasound
currently remains indication driven and not routinely offered to all low-risk
pregnancies.23
First Trimester Ultrasound—Guidelines from the German
Society of Ultrasound in Medicine
The DEGUM published in 2016 an update of the guidelines of the first trimester
ultrasound scan, dedicated to ultrasound specialists.17 Prerequisites for the NT
measurements are not only technical as recommended by the Fetal Medicine Foundation,
but include the process of informed consent and patient counseling according to existing
genetic laws.17 The document emphasizes the role of an early anatomic survey
performed by a specialist as an integral part of the first trimester ultrasound, especially
in the era of the noninvasive prenatal testing (see Chapter 6). The minimum anatomic
requirements in the first trimester for the assessment of the fetus are summarized in
Table 1.8 and are slightly different from those listed in the ISUOG guidelines.
CONCLUSIONS
The first trimester ultrasound has evolved over the years to become an integral part of
obstetric scanning in many modalities around the world. Beyond the confirmation of an
intrauterine location of a gestational sac, viability of an embryo or a fetus, accurate
pregnancy dating, determination of placental chorionicity in multiple pregnancies, the
first trimester ultrasound has evolved to become a comprehensive early anatomic survey
when performed by experienced personnel. This book presents the collective
experience in the first trimester ultrasound examination in two prenatal diagnosis
centers. Our experience is also supported by studies and case reports from the
literature. Following chapters in this book present various topics related to the first
trimester ultrasound examination to include bioeffects of ultrasound, fetal biometry,
aneuploidy screening, image optimization, multiple pregnancies, and detailed
assessment of the normal and abnormal anatomy of various fetal organ systems.
Table 1.8 • Ultrasound Standard Views of the Fetal Anatomy and Optional
Parameters According to the German Society of Ultrasound in Medicine
Guidelines (DEGUM)171.
2.
3.
4.
Standard Views Optional Parameters
Skull/brain Bone of the skull, falx cerebri,
choroid plexus
Intracranial translucency,
brainstem
Face Profile Eyes, maxillary and mandible,
lips
Neck Nuchal translucency (NT)a Nasal bone (NB)a
Spine Outline
Heart/thorax Position, contour, fourchamber view, lungs
Outflow tracts (color), threevessel trachea view, tricuspid
flow (TR)a
Abdomen Stomach, abdominal wall
Diaphragm, DV flowa,
umbilical arteries, and urinary
bladder
Extremities Arms, legs Hands and feet (femur, tibia,
fibula, humerus, radius, ulna)
Urogenital
tract Urinary bladder Kidneys
Placenta Chorionicity, amnionicity
(multiple gestation), structure
Position, insertion of umbilical
cord, uterine arteriesa
aAfter counseling and consenting according to German law on genetics and
certification through the Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF).
Kaisenberg von C, Chaoui R, Häusler M, et al. Quality Requirements for
the early Fetal Ultrasound Assessment at 11-13+6 Weeks of G
Nhận xét
Đăng nhận xét