Case 19 A 29-year-old woman with leaking
fluid per vaginum at 31 weeks’
gestation
Ms McRoberts, a 29-year-old para 3 + 0, presented to the
labour ward at 31 weeks’ gestation with a history of a gush
of fluid per vaginum in the early hours of the morning. She
had been on her way to the toilet when she noticed fluid
running down her legs. She had undergone a routine check
with her midwife 2 days ago, when she was told that all
was well with the pregnancy.
What would be the differential
diagnosis here?
• Preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM)
• Urinary incontinence
• Vaginal discharge
Past obstetric history
Details of her previous pregnancies and labours:
• Gestation at delivery (term or preterm)
• History of PPROM
• Spontaneous or induced labour
• Mode of delivery (vaginal or by caesarean section)
• Any complications
Past medical history including allergies
Is there anything of relevance in her past medical history
and does she have any allegies?
Ms McRoberts has had an uneventful pregnancy until
tonight. She denies any abdominal pain or contractions and
reports normal fetal movements. She experienced a sudden
gush of clear fluid on her way to the toilet. The fluid ran
down her legs and wet the bathroom floor. She gives no
history of dysuria but reports increased urinary frequency for
the past week or two. Apart from that she had been feeling
well and denies any major medical problems or allergies. She
admits to smoking up to 20 cigarettes per day.
She has had three previous pregnancies. In her first two
pregnancies she laboured spontaneously and had uneventful
vaginal deliveries at term, while in the third pregnancy she
had a preterm vaginal birth at 33 weeks’ gestation following
PPROM and then preterm labour. She gives no history of
postnatal problems.
What key features would you look for
on physical examination?
General examination
Signs of labour – does she appear to be in pain? Check
her pulse, blood pressure and temperature recordings:
tachycardia and pyrexia may indicate an infection.
Abdominal examination
• Uterine contractions
• Lie and presentation of the baby and symphysiofundal
height
Obstetrics and Gynaecology: Clinical Cases Uncovered.
By M. Cruickshank and A. Shetty. Published 2009 by Blackwell
Publishing. ISBN 978-1-4051-8671-1.
KEY POINT
PPROM is defined as prelabour rupture of membranes
prior to 37 completed weeks of gestation. It complicates
2% of pregnancies but is associated with 40% of preterm
deliveries.
What specific information would you
need from her history to help you
formulate a diagnosis?
Presenting complaints
• Colour and amount of the fluid
• Any associated abdominal pain/contractions?
• Has she felt the baby move?
• Any urinary symptoms (e.g. dysuria and frequency)?
• Any flu - like symptoms?
• Any problems in the present pregnancy?Case 19 127
PART 2: CASES
• Tenderness on palpation (sign of infection)
• Fetal heart check with Doppler and cardiotocograph
(CTG)
• Pad check for colour of fluid
Ms McRoberts appears anxious but not in any pain. Her
pulse is 90 beats/minute, her BP is 110/70mmHg and her
temperature is 36.8°C. On palpation, the uterus is relaxed
and non-tender with the fetus presenting as cephalic. The
fundal height is appropriate to her gestation. The CTG
appears reassuring with a normal reactive baseline of
approximately 140 beats/minute, with accelerations.
What would you do next?
Speculum examination
The next step would be a sterile speculum examination
looking for pooling of fluid in the posterior vaginal
fornix to confirm spontaneous rupture of membranes. A
convincing history followed by demonstration of presence of fluid in the posterior vaginal fornix is highly
suggestive if not conclusive of rupture of membranes and
further diagnostic tests are unnecessary. A high vaginal
swab is obtained for culture and sensitivity at this time.
However, in case of equivocal findings it may be necessary to proceed to further diagnostic tests to confirm or
refute the diagnosis of PPROM.
What additional diagnostic tests could
you use?
1 The nitrazine test. A series of tests have been used to
confirm membrane rupture; the most widely used has
been the nitrazine test:
Detects pH change
Has a sensitivity of 90% and false positive rate of
17%
Normal vaginal pH is 4.5 – 6.0 (nitrazine paper does
not change colour). With ruptured membranes, vaginal
pH is 7.1 – 7.3 (colour of paper changes to blue)
A false positive test (nitrazine positive, pH >7) indicates blood, semen, antiseptic solutions or bacterial
vaginosis
More recently, other tests (e.g. fetal fibronectin and
raised insulin - like growth factor binding protein - 1 in
cervical or vaginal secretions) have reported sensitivities
of 94% and 75%, and specificities of 97%, respectively.
2 Ultrasound for liquor volume. Ultrasound is useful in
some cases to help confirm the diagnosis of PPROM,
by demonstrating oligohydramnios (reduced liquor
volume).
3 Mid - stream sample of urine (MSSU). MSSU should be
obtained at this stage if other tests are negative to exclude
a urinary tract infection.
A sterile speculum examination was performed which
revealed obvious pools of clear fluid in the posterior vaginal
fornix.
In view of the convincing history of rupture of membranes at 31 weeks ’ gestation and the presence of pools
of liquor on speculum examination, the diagnosis was
that of PPROM.
!RED FLAG
Digital examination should be avoided where PPROM is
suspected.
Box 19.1 Preterm premature rupture of
membranes
• PPROM leads to significant neonatal morbidity and
mortality
• The three causes of increased neonatal morbidity and
mortality are prematurity, sepsis and pulmonary
hypoplasia
• Maternal risks are associated with chorioamnionitis
• Women with intrauterine infection deliver earlier than
non-infected women and infants born with sepsis have
a mortality rate four times higher than those without
sepsis
Risk factors associated with PPROM
• History of PPROM in previous pregnancy
• Tobacco use
• Amniocentesis or cervical cerclage in present pregnancy
• History of cone biopsy of cervix
• Uterine distension resulting from polyhydramnios and
multiple pregnancy
• Cervical or vaginal infection (e.g. bacterial vaginosis,
group B streptococci, ureaplasma, Chlamydia)
Course prior to delivery
• Term PROM: labour starts within 24 hours in 70% of
cases
• PPROM between 28 and 34 weeks: labour starts within
24 hours in 50% of cases; labour starts within 1 week
in 80% of cases
• PPROM between weeks 24 and 26: labour starts within
1 week in >50%; labour delayed 4 weeks in 22%128 Part 2: Cases
PART 2: CASES
The ultrasound scan shows that Ms McRoberts’ baby is
presenting as cephalic, is well grown and in good condition,
with reduced amniotic fluid volume. She is apyrexial with a
normal white cell count and has a CRP of <10. An high
vaginal swab has been reported as negative.
What would you do next?
Prophylactic antibiotics
The use of antibiotics following PPROM was associated
with a statistically significant reduction in chorioamnionitis. There was a significant reduction in the numbers of
babies born within 48 hours and 7 days. Neonatal infection was significantly reduced in the babies whose
mothers received antibiotics. Erythromycin (250 mg
orally 6 - hourly) should be given for 10 days following the
diagnosis of PPROM. Co - amoxiclav is not recommended
for women with PPROM because of concerns about necrotizing enterocolitis.
Corticosteroids
Antenatal corticosteroids should be administered in
women with PPROM as steroids reduce the risks of respiratory distress syndrome, intraventricular haemorrhage
and necrotizing enterocolitis. They do not appear to
increase the risk of infection in either the mother or the
fetus.
Digital vaginal examination is best avoided unless
there is a strong suspicion that the woman may be
in labour. This is because microorganisms may be
transported from the vagina into the cervix, leading to
intrauterine infection, prostaglandin release and preterm
labour.
What would be your plan
of management?
1. Assess fetal well - being. Use fetal CTG and ultrasound
to assess fetal well - being. Use ultrasound to establish the
fetal growth and lie, and amniotic fluid volume.
2. Exclude maternal infection by:
Regular observations – pulse, temperature, uterine
activity and tenderness
Blood tests – full blood count, C - reactive protein
(CRP)
High vaginal swab – chorioamnionitis is an ascending infection
KEY POINT
The criteria for the diagnosis of clinical chorioamnionitis
include maternal pyrexia (>37.8°C), tachycardia,
leucocytosis, uterine tenderness, offensive vaginal
discharge and fetal tachycardia (>160 beats/minute).
During inpatient observation, the woman should
be regularly examined for such signs of intrauterine
infection as an abnormal parameter or a combination
can indicate intrauterine infection (Box 19.2 ).
Box 19.2 Royal College of Obstetricians and
Gynaecologists (RCOG) recommendations for
monitoring for intrauterine infection
• Women should be observed for signs of clinical
chorioamnionitis at least 12-hourly
• A weekly high vaginal swab and at least a weekly
maternal full blood count should be considered
• Fetal monitoring using CTG should be considered where
regular fetal surveillance is required
• Biophysical profile scoring or Doppler velocimetry should
not be considered as first-line surveillance or diagnostic
tests for fetal infection
KEY POINT
Betamethasone is the steroid of choice to enhance lung
maturation. Recommended therapy involves two doses of
12mg betamethasone, given intramuscularly 24 hours
apart.
The optimal treatment – delivery interval for administration of antenatal corticosteroids is more than 24 hours
but fewer than 7 days after the start of treatment.
Ms McRoberts wonders whether she should receive drugs to
prevent onset of labour to enable her to complete the
course of corticosteroids.
Could tocolytic agents be used?
Evidence suggests that prophylactic tocolysis in women
with PPROM without uterine activity is not recommended. The only indication for the short - term use of
tocolytics could be to complete the course of steroids for
fetal lung maturity or to allow for in utero transfer of theCase 19 129
PART 2: CASES
mother to a unit with neonatal facilities to manage a
preterm neonate.
Ms McRoberts enquires about when she
might be delivered?
Delivery should be considered at 34 weeks ’ gestation.
Where expectant management is considered beyond
34 weeks ’ gestation, women should be counselled about
the increased risk of chorioamnionitis and its consequences versus the decreased risk of serious respiratory
problems in the neonate, admission for neonatal
intensive care and caesarean section. Therefore, it is
standard practice to manage expectantly until 34 weeks ’
gestation.
Ms McRoberts is commenced on erythromycin as per
protocol and also receives the first betamethasone injection.
The neonatal unit is informed of her admission to ensure
there is an available neonatal bed. The plan is for expectant
management and induction of labour at 34 weeks’
gestation. She feels well and wonders if she could be
managed as an outpatient as she lives near the hospital
and is willing to come for regular check ups and blood
tests.
Can Ms McRoberts be managed as
an outpatient?
In a randomized study of home versus hospital management outcomes, the two groups were comparable with a
similar latency period and gestational age at delivery.
There were no significant differences in the frequencies
of chorioamnionitis, respiratory distress syndrome or
neonatal sepsis (Box 19.3 ).
A management plan is made for Ms McRoberts to be
monitored as an inpatient for 72 hours and then for
discharge home, if all remains well. However, later that day
she experiences abdominal discomfort and reports irregular
uterine activity. Her observations are normal and the CTG is
reassuring. On palpation she is noted to have one to two
mild contractions every 15 minutes. The registrar on duty
performs a sterile vaginal examination, which shows the
cervix to be 1–2cm dilated and shortened. The diagnosis is
that of threatened preterm labour.
Ms McRoberts is extremely worried about her baby’s
health as she has not completed her steroid course and asks
the registrar if anything could be done to stop her from
labouring?
There is no clear evidence that tocolysis improves
pregnancy outcome. Tocolysis should be considered if the
few days gained would be put to good use, such as completing a course of corticosteroids or in utero transfer.
Once a decision is made to use a
tocolytic drug, which is the best choice?
Atosiban or nifedipine appear preferable to ritodrine, a
beta - agonist, as they have fewer adverse effects and seem
to have comparable effectiveness (Box 19.4 ). Atosiban (an
oxytocin antagonist) is licensed for tocolysis in the UK
but nifedipine (a calcium - channel blocker) is not. Ritodrine has been the most thoroughly evaluated but, like
all beta - agonists, has a high frequency of unpleasant and
sometimes severe adverse effects (Box 19.5 ).
Box 19.3 RCOG recommendations for
outpatient management in PPROM
• Women should be considered for outpatient monitoring
of PPROM only after rigorous individual selection
• Outpatient monitoring should be considered only after a
period of 48–72 hours of inpatient observation
• Women being monitored at home for PPROM should
take their temperature twice daily and should be advised
of the symptoms associated with chorioamnionitis (e.g.
abdominal pain, pyrexia, change in the colour, smell of
the fluid leaking per vaginum), and when they should
seek specialist advice
• There should be clearly described local arrangements for
the frequency of outpatient visits and what should be
carried out at these visits
Box 19.4 Tocolytic agents
A variety of preparations are available of comparative
efficacy but different side-effect profiles
• Atosiban: oxytocin antagonist
• Nifedipine: calcium-channel antagonist
• Ritodrine (beta-agonist): not preferred because of
maternal side-effects
• Indometacin (antiprostaglandin): concerns about safety
in fetus and neonate
• Nitric oxide donors mainly glyceryl trinitrate: under trial,
comparative effectiveness to beta-agonist but fewer
maternal side-effects
• Magnesium sulphate: popular in the USA, comparative
effectiveness to ritodrine but better tolerated130 Part 2: Cases
PART 2: CASES
After discussion, Ms McRoberts is commenced on the
tocolytic drug atosiban and monitored in accordance with
the departmental guideline in the high dependency area.
Over the next few hours she feels more comfortable, her
contractions settle and she manages some sleep overnight.
Her observations remain stable on the infusion. She receives
the second dose of betamethasone IM the following
morning, and is transferred to the antenatal ward for
observation after the ward round. The management plans
remain as before: if she does not labour for outpatient
management and induction of labour around 34 weeks’
gestation.
Ms McRoberts is discharged from hospital 72 hours later
with follow-up planned at the day assessment unit, with
advice regarding monitoring for the warning signs of
chorioamnionitis. She starts to labour spontaneously 1 week
later, comes into hospital and is delivered of a baby boy in
good condition weighing 1956g. The baby is transferred to
neonatal unit in view of his prematurity. Her postnatal
period is uneventful and she is discharged home 2 days
later. Over the next few weeks her baby makes good
progress in the neonatal unit requiring minimal ventilatory
support and is discharged home 4 weeks later.
CASE REVIEW
Ms McRoberts presented with a convincing history of
PPROM with no evidence of labour. She was a heavy
smoker with a past obstetric history of preterm delivery
and PPROM, thus putting her at a high risk of these recurring again in this pregnancy.
The diagnosis was confirmed by a speculum examination. Normal recordings and relevant investigations confirmed maternal and fetal well - being. She was commenced
on prophylactic antibiotics and prescribed steroids for fetal
lung maturity, with a plan for conservative management
until 34 weeks ’ gestation in the absence of chorioamniotis.
However, before the course of steroids was complete she
developed signs of labour. Tocolysis in the form of atosiban
infusion was started to enable her to complete the course
of steroids. Thereafter she was managed as an outpatient
as the uterine contractions settled down and there was no
evidence of chorioamnionitis.
Premature labour set in within a week and she had a
spontaneous vaginal delivery. Prior to discharge she was
counselled about her increased risk of PPROM and
preterm labour in subsequent pregnancies. This woman
would be a candidate for detection and treatment of
asymptomatic infections (e.g. bacterial vaginosis) by
means of high vaginal swab in the second and early third
trimesters along with prophylactic steroids (at around
28 – 29 weeks) for fetal lung maturity.
Box 19.5 Side-effects of tocolytic drugs
Maternal side-effects
Common: nausea, headache, dizziness, tachycardia,
palpitations, chest pain
Rare: hypotension, hyperglycemia, pulmonary oedema
(beta-agonists)
Atosiban is associated with fewer maternal side-effects
than beta-agonists
Fetal side-effects
• Fetal and neonatal tachycardia
• Premature closure of ductus arteriosis, renal and cerebral
vasoconstriction, necrotizing enterocolitis (indometacin)Case 19 131
PART 2: CASES
Further reading
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists . Tocolytic
drugs for women in preterm labour. Green - top Guideline No.1
(B). RCOG , London , 2002 .
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists . Antenatal
corticosteroids to prevent respiratory distress syndrome. Green -
top Guideline No. 7. RCOG , London , 2004 .
KEY POINTS
• Preterm labour is the single most important determinant
of adverse infant outcome, most morbidity and mortality
being experienced by babies born before 34 weeks
• Definition: onset of labour prior to 37 completed weeks
of gestation
• Incidence: 6–15% of deliveries
• Risk factors for preterm labour include:
low socioeconomic status
extremes of maternal age
tobacco use or substance abuse
prior preterm delivery or second trimester miscarriage
African-American race
uterine anomaly (e.g. unicornuate or bicornuate uterus)
genitourinary infection
uterine distension caused by twins, polyhydramnios
history of cervical cone biopsy
• Prediction of PTL: various scoring systems exist,
incorporating:
history of preterm delivery
assessment of cervical length: transvaginal ultrasound is
the most sensitive test
fetal fibronectin: high negative predictive value
research tools: salivary oestriol, home monitoring
• Prevention:
prophylactic cervical cerclage if cervical incompetence is
suspected
detection and treatment of asymptomatic infections in
high risk women (e.g. bacterial vaginosis, asymptomatic
bacteriuria)
• Treatment:
emergency cerclage/rescue cervical suture (limited
evidence)
tocolysis: no clear evidence that it improves outcome.
Should be considered if the few days gained would be
put to good use, such as completing a course of
corticosteroids or in utero transfer. Evidence suggests
no benefit of antibiotic use in women with intact
membranes.
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists . Preterm
prelabour rupture of membranes. Green - top Guideline No. 44.
RCOG , London , 2006 .
Nhận xét
Đăng nhận xét