Case 20 A 35-year-old woman booking for antenatal care

 Case 20 A 35-year-old woman booking for

antenatal care

Mrs Todd is a 35-year-old woman in her third pregnancy.

Her last menstrual period (LMP) was 12 weeks ago and she

has been well in this pregnancy up until now. She is

attending for her first antenatal visit.

Antenatal screening is designed to identify those pregnancies at greater risk of complications. It comprises

information from the history, as well as ultrasound scanning, blood tests and other investigations. As a result of

cost and clinical effectiveness, only screening tests recommended by the National Institute for Health and Clinical

Excellence (NICE) are included here, although other

screening tests are indicated during some pregnancies.

What information do you need from

the history?

1 Past obstetric history

 Number and outcomes of previous pregnancies

 Any problems with the pregnancies including:

 pre - eclampsia, abruption, etc.

 mode of delivery

 gestation at delivery

 birth weights

 any postnatal problems

2 Past medical history

3 Drug history, including allergies

4 Social history

 Ethnicity

 Occupation

 Social support

 Smoking

 Alcohol intake

 Illicit drug use

5 Family history, including partner and his family

She tells you that her first two pregnancies were

uncomplicated vaginal deliveries at term of normal-sized

babies. She has no significant past medical history or

allergies and does not take any medicines. She is a legal

secretary, does not drink alcohol or use illicit drugs but

smokes 30 cigarettes per day. She is adopted and unable to

provide any information regarding family history but there

are no problems on her husband’s side.

What advice will you offer at

this stage?

She should try to cut down or stop smoking. If her

partner smokes they could stop together. Smoking cessation advice, support groups and nicotine replacement

therapy are all available in pregnancy via referral from

maternity services or her GP.

She accepts your offer to refer her for smoking cessation

advice as she realizes it is detrimental to hers and her baby’s

health.

She has read the leaflet that the hospital sent about

screening in pregnancy but is very unclear and would like

you to explain it to her.

What would you discuss with her?

Screening in pregnancy is designed to detect conditions

that have no symptoms but can have detrimental effects

on her or her baby. They usually comprise blood tests,

urine tests and ultrasound scanning. They aim to detect

infections, fetal abnormalities and abnormalities in the

maternal blood (Boxes 20.1 & 20.2 ). Screening is also

available for some medical conditions that can affect the

pregnancy.

Mrs Todd accepts haematological screening and screening

for infection. She tells you she is very worried about the risk

of Down’s syndrome in this pregnancy as her neighbour had

a baby with Down’s syndrome after low risk screening. She

asks you if she can have an ultrasound scan to make sure

her baby does not have Down’s syndrome.

Obstetrics and Gynaecology: Clinical Cases Uncovered.

By M. Cruickshank and A. Shetty. Published 2009 by Blackwell

Publishing. ISBN 978-1-4051-8671-1.Case 20 133

PART 2: CASES

What will you tell her?

Ultrasound is a useful test for many fetal abnormalities

but is not a good test for Down ’ s syndrome as many

babies with Down ’ s syndrome appear normal on scan.

Screening tests are available for Down ’ s syndrome and

other chromosomal abnormalities but only provide a risk

of the pregnancy being affected. That means that low risk

results do not definitely mean the baby is unaffected

(false negatives). Conversely, a high risk result does not

definitely mean the baby is affected (false positives). The

simplest test of risk is based on maternal age. At 20 years

the risk is 1 in 1440 rising to 1 in 32 aged 45. Mrs Todd ’ s

age related risk at 35 years is 1 in 338. Other screening

tests involve combinations of blood tests, ultrasound

scans and some information from the mother ’ s history.

If a screening test has a high - risk result (usually >1 in

250), because the baby is not definitely affected the

parents would be offered a diagnostic test (amniocentesis

or chorionic villous sampling [CVS]) to provide a definitive diagnosis.

Mrs Todd understands what you have told her and does not

think she wants to have an amniocentesis straight away but

would consider it if she was uncomfortable with the results

of the screening tests. She asks you for more information

about the available tests.

Box 20.1 Screening for haematological conditions

Anaemia

Adequate haemoglobin concentrations prevent symptoms

and reduce the need for postnatal blood transfusion. The

most common cause of anaemia in pregnancy is iron

deficiency. Screening for anaemia should be offered at

booking and 28 weeks. This allows time for treatment if

anaemia is detected.

Hb levels <11g/dL at booking or <10.5g/dL at 28 weeks

should be investigated with a serum ferritin. Levels <30μg/L

indicate inadequate iron stores and supplementation should

be prescribed.

Blood grouping and red cell alloantibodies

Identifying blood group, rhesus D status and red cell

antibodies is important in preventing haemolytic disease of

the newborn and to identify potential transfusion reactions.

Identifying rhesus D-negative women also allows them to

be offered appropriate antenatal and postnatal

immunoprophylaxis to try to prevent rhesus D

alloimmunization in subsequent pregnancies.

Current recommendations are testing of ABO, rhesus D

typing and screening for irregular antibodies at booking

and 28 weeks’ gestation.

Sickle cell disorders and thalassaemia

Haemoglobin disorders are autosomal recessive but it is

possible to inherit more than one. They can cause a

variety of illnesses of varying severity and the aim of

screening is to identify women at risk in early pregnancy

so that genetic counselling can be provided and they can

make a decision about invasive diagnostic tests and

continuation of their pregnancy.

Screening can be based on a combination of an

ethnicity question to identify women at higher risk, then

investigation of the high risk group for haemoglobin

abnormalities, or on offering laboratory screening to all

pregnant women.

It is important to discuss with her the methods,

timing and possible consequences of screening, including the possibility of being faced with a decision

about termination of an affected pregnancy. You should

also discuss the options available for screening in

your hospital. Screening for Down ’ s syndrome includes

screening the pregnancy for some other chromosomal

abnormalities (e.g. trisomy 13 and 18; Boxes 20.3 & 20.4 ;

Fig. 20.1 ). You should tell her that she can change

her mind and opt out of the screening programme at

any time.

She is happy to accept the combined test and has her

booking scan and NT performed. She has a 12-week

singleton continuing pregnancy with neural tubes within the

normal range. The midwife performs her booking bloods

along with the pregnancy-associated plasma protein A

(PAPP-A) and human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) as part

of the combined test (Box 20.5).

At 20 weeks she returns to the hospital for her detailed

ultrasound scan. The combined test gave the pregnancy a

risk of Down’s syndrome of 1 in 1775 and Mrs Todd and

her partner are reassured by this. They wonder if they still

need the detailed scan.134 Part 2: Cases

PART 2: CASES

Box 20.2 Screening for infections

Asymptomatic bacteriuria

Persistent bacterial colonization of the urinary tract occurs in

2–5% of pregnant women in the UK. Pregnant women with

asymptomatic bacteruria have an increased risk of

pyelonephritis and preterm birth. Treatment with antibiotics

reduces these risks.

It is therefore recommended that all pregnant women be

screened for this with mid-stream urine culture early in

pregnancy and treated with appropriate antibiotics if it is

detected.

Hepatitis B virus infection

Hepatitis B infection is often asymptomatic and may be

highly infectious. Mother–child transmission results in a

significant proportion of chronic carriage in the baby and

chronic carriage results in a high risk of hepatocellular

carcinoma and cirrhosis. Approximately 95% of mother–

child transmission is preventable through the administration

of vaccine and immunoglobulin to the baby at birth.

Therefore, all pregnant women should be offered serum

screening for hepatitis B infection to allow effective postnatal

intervention to be offered. Immunoglobulin administration

and hepatits B vaccination for babies of infected women

reduces the risk of mother–child transmission.

HIV

The prevalence of HIV in women of reproductive age is

increasing in the UK. In the absence of intervention,

mother–child transmission occurs in around 25% of

deliveries. Appropriate interventions (see Case 26) can

reduce this figure to <1%.

All pregnant women should be offered screening for HIV

antibodies early in pregnancy so appropriate interventions

can be put in place to reduce vertical transmission.

Rubella

Rubella infection in early pregnancy can have catastrophic

consequences. There is no treatment to prevent or reduce

mother–child transmission of rubella for the current

pregnancy. Screening for rubella antibodies enables

susceptible women to be vaccinated in the postnatal

period for the protection of future pregnancies.

Syphilis

Syphilis is rare now in the indigenous UK population but

may be more common in the increasing immigrant

population.

In pregnant women with early untreated syphilis,

70–100% of babies will be infected and one-third will be

stillborn. Mother–child transmission is associated with

neonatal death, congenital syphilis (which may cause

long-term disability), stillbirth and prematurity.

Early detection and parenteral treatment of the mother

with penicillin effectively prevents mother–child

transmission. The outcome of treated pregnancies with

syphilis is comparable with the outcome of pregnancies in

women who never had syphilis. Screening also allows for

appropriate referral to genitourinary medicine (GUM)

services and treatment of the mother. Therefore, despite

the rarity of the condition as a result of the efficacy of

available treatment and serious consequences of

non-treatment, screening continues.

Box 20.3 Screening for Down’s syndrome (trisomy 21) and other common chromosomal abnormalities

Antenatal screening can take place in the first or second

trimester. It is recommended that the test performed should

have a detection rate above 75% for a false positive rate

less than 3% (NICE guideline on antenatal screening; see

further reading). The tests all have advantages and

disadvantages in terms of timing and false positive and

negative rates but meet the above criteria as a minimum.

11–14 weeks – the combined test

Nuchal translucency (NT) measures the subcutaneous space

between skin and cervical spine in early pregnancy. Increased

measurements are associated with increased risk (Fig. 20.1).

This measurement is used in combination with maternal

serum levels of human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) and

pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A). The NT

can usually be performed with the booking scan.

14–20 weeks – the quadruple test

Maternal serum is sent for the quadruple test that

comprises hCG, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), unconjugated

estriol (uE3) and inhibin A.

11–14 weeks and 14–20 weeks

The integrated test – NT, PAPP-A + hCG, AFP, uE3,

inhibin A

plus

the serum integrated test – PAPP-A + hCG, AFP, uE3,

inhibin ACase 20 135

PART 2: CASES

What would you discuss with her

regarding the mid-trimester

anomaly scan?

The screening test she has already had was for the

common trisomies. The detailed ultrasound aims to

detect structural abnormalities in the baby. However,

detailed ultrasound scans do not detect all abnormalities.

If any abnormalities are detected during this screening

scan a more detailed scan will be offered. If the baby has

a major abnormality it may mean having to reach a decision about whether or not to continue with the pregnancy. It can also give valuable information regarding a

problem that may require specialist paediatric services,

and may help with deciding the place of birth of a baby

with a known abnormality (Box 20.6 ; Fig. 20.4 ; Table

20.1 ).

Mrs Todd is happy to have her detailed ultrasound scan

which shows that her baby appears structurally normal. She

is very reassured and able to relax through the latter half of

her pregnancy.

Box 20.4 Screening for neural tube defects

A maternal serum AFP carried out between 15 and 21

weeks can indicate a high risk for neural tube defects

(NTDs). A value >2mean of median is considered high risk

and these women would be offered detailed ultrasound

scans to look for a cause for the elevated AFP.

Problems other than NTDs that may cause an elevated

AFP:

• Inaccurate pregnancy dating

• Bleeding in early pregnancy

• Multiple pregnancy

• Fetal death

• Abdominal wall defects – gastroschisis or exomphalos

Sometimes an elevated AFP is unexplained and these

pregnancies remain at increased risk of intrauterine

growth restriction, preterm delivery and pre-eclampsia,

closer surveillance of these pregnancies may be

warranted.

If routine detailed ultrasound scanning is offered to all

women at 20 weeks’ gestation, most of the abnormalities

resulting in an elevated AFP would be detected and it may

be unnecessary to offer this test in addition to a routine

detailed ultrasound scan.

Figure 20.1 Nuchal thickness on scan.

Box 20.5 Diagnostic tests

If a pregnancy is found to be at high risk of a

chromosomal abnormality the woman then has the option

of an invasive diagnostic test to identify the karyotype of

the fetus.

Chorionic villous sampling (CVS) can be performed

between 10 and 14 weeks’ gestation. It takes a tiny

amount of tissue from the placenta and carries a 2% risk

of miscarriage (Fig. 20.2).

Amniocentesis can be performed from 15 weeks’

gestation. Amniotic fluid is withdrawn from around the

fetus and the fetal fibroblasts in the fluid are cultured to

give the fetal karyotype. It carries approximnately 1% risk

of miscarriage (Fig. 20.3). The provisional result is usually

available after 24–72 hours (from quantitative fluorescence

polymerase chain reaction [QF-PCR]) with a full karyotype

in a few weeks.

In addition to the risk of miscarriage, there is an

approximtely 1% risk of mosaicism, culture failure and

requiring repeat testing depending on which test is

undertaken.136 Part 2: Cases

PART 2: CASES

Figure 20.2 Chorionic villus sampling.

Chorionic villi

Figure 20.3 Amniocentesis.

Probe

Placenta

Womb

(uterus)

Amniotic

fluid

Entrance of womb (cervix) Rectum

Vagina

Bladder

Needle

Figure 20.4 Gastroschisis.

Box 20.6 Detailed ultrasound scan

Many abnormalities can be detected on mid-trimester

ultrasound:

• Cleft lip

• Ventricular and atrial septal defects

• Diaphragmatic herniae

• Absent or abnormal kidneys

• Gastroschisis and exomphalos (Fig. 20.4)

• Spina bifida

• Limb abnormalities

The detection rates vary with the:

• Type of abnormality being screened

• Gestational age at scanning

• Skill of the operator

• Quality of the equipment

• Time allotted for the scanCase 20 137

PART 2: CASES

Table 20.1 Percentage of fetal abnormalities detected by

routine ultrasound screening in the second trimester (evidence

level IIa). As detection rates vary, all departments providing

detailed scanning services should monitor their own results

and provide local detection rates to assist patient’s decisionmaking about detailed ultrasound scan.

Anatomical system Detected (%)

Central nervous system 76

Urinary tract 67

Pulmonary 50

Gastrointestinal 42

Skeletal 24

Cardiac 17

Further reading

Antenatal care: routine care for the healthy pregnant woman.

NICE Clinical Guideline CG62, March 2008 .

Nhận xét