Stepwise Approach to the Basic Ultrasound Examination of the
Female Pelvis
INTRODUCTION
Ectopic pregnancy is the leading cause of pregnancy-related deaths during the first trimester (1).
The incidence of ectopic pregnancy has been on the increase over the past several decades (2)
and it continues to contribute significantly to maternal morbidity and mortality, especially in the
developing world (3).
RISK FACTORS
Several risk factors for ectopic pregnancy exist (4) and are listed in Table 13.1. History of tubal
surgery such as prior tubal sterilization or prior tubal surgery for ectopic pregnancy are amongst
the most common risk factors and thus should heighten alertness for the presence of an ectopic
pregnancy in symptomatic patients. Other risk factors include pelvic inflammatory disease,
female infertility and use of an intra-uterine device.
CLINICAL SYMPTOMS
Ectopic pregnancy should be considered when a patient presents with pain and/or vaginal
bleeding in the setting of a positive pregnancy test. The presence of an adnexal mass on physical
examination should also initiate an ectopic pregnancy work-up, when a positive pregnancy test is
present. Clinical symptoms are not specific for ectopic pregnancy and should not be used solely
for diagnosis. The location of the pain may vary (5) and the clinical triad of pain, bleeding and
adnexal mass is present in less than half of patients with ectopic pregnancy (6).
TABLE 13.1 Risk Factors for Ectopic Pregnancy
- History of tubal surgery
- History of prior ectopic pregnancy
- Use of Intrauterine Device
- History of infertility
ANATOMIC LOCATION OF ECTOPIC PREGNANCY
Most ectopic pregnancies are located along the course of the fallopian tube, with the ampullary
and isthmic sections of the tube accounting for the largest proportions of ectopic pregnancies
(Figure 13.1). Other rare tubal locations include the fimbrial end of the tube or the interstitial
(cornual) end of the tube (Figure 13.1). The interstitial or cornual ectopic pregnancy deserves
special mention, as ectopic pregnancies in this location typically present at a more advanced
stage in gestation and are commonly associated with severe hemorrhage and maternal shock at
the time of presentation. Cornual ectopic pregnancies are also more difficult to diagnose by
ultrasound as they mimic a normal intrauterine gestation, especially when they present at an
advanced stage. Figure 13.2 and 13.3 show cornual ectopic pregnancies in the early part of the
first trimester and Figures 13.4 and 13.5 show cornual ectopic pregnancies at more advanced
gestations. Cervical ectopic pregnancies occur in less than 1 % of all ectopic pregnancies and are
typically diagnosed by transvaginal ultrasound (Figure 13.6). Cervical ectopic pregnancies are
best treated with either intramuscular or direct injection, into the gestational sac, of methotrexate
or potassium chloride (into gestational sac) under ultrasound guidance, especially when
preservation of fertility is desired. Conservative management, following injection of
methotrexate or potassium chloride into the gestational sac, is desired, as long as the patient is
not bleeding excessively, as most injected cervical ectopic pregnancies will spontaneously
resolve. In low-resource settings where treatment options are limited, cervical ectopic pregnancy
with heavy vaginal bleeding can be temporarily managed (tamponade) with placement of a
cervical cerclage when technically feasible or by inserting compression (30 cc) Foley ballooncatheter(s) into the cervical canal.
Figure 13.1: Locations of ectopic pregnancies in the pelvis. Most ectopic pregnancies are
located along the course of the fallopian tube, with the ampullary and isthmic sections
accounting for the largest proportions. Abdominal pregnancy is not depicted in this sketch.
Sketch is courtesy of Dr. Igor Palahnuk.
Figure 13.2: Grey scale and color Doppler ultrasound of a cornual ectopic
pregnancy at 6 weeks’ gestation (arrows). Note that the endometrial echo (labeled
as endometrium) is distinctly separate from the cornual ectopic pregnancy
(asterisk). Note the yolk sac within the ectopic pregnancy (labeled).
Figure 13.3: Grey scale ultrasound of a cornual ectopic pregnancy at 7 weeks’
gestation (arrows). Note that the endometrial echo (labeled endometrium) is
distinctly separate from the cornual ectopic pregnancy (asterisk).
Figure 13.4: Transvaginal ultrasound of a transverse plane of the upper uterus
showing a cornual ectopic pregnancy (white arrows) at 9 weeks’ gestation. Note
that the endometrial echo (labeled as endometrium) is distinctly separate from
the cornual ectopic pregnancy (asterisk). The ectopic sac is bulging on the
serosal aspect of the uterus (red arrow heads).
Figure 13.5: Transvaginal ultrasound of an oblique plane of the upper uterus showing a
cornual ectopic pregnancy (arrows) at 13 weeks’ gestation. Note the size of the cornual
pregnancy (labeled) that may be mistaken for an intrauterine gestation. The uterus is
labeled in yellow.
Implantation of a gestational sac in a cesarean section scar is referred to as cesarean scar
implantation and is technically not an ectopic pregnancy as the gestational sac is within the
uterine cavity. Cesarean scar implantation can lead, later in gestation, to severe placental
abnormalities, such as placenta accreta, or rupture of the gestational sac (7, 8). The diagnosis of a
cesarean section scar implantation is performed when a gestational sac is noted by ultrasound to
be located in the lower uterine segment, in or near, a cesarean section scar, in a patient with a
prior cesarean section. Magnification of the ultrasound image may help confirm the diagnosis
(Figure 13.7 and 13.8). Similar to cervical ectopic pregnancy, treatment of cesarean section scar
implantation is best achieved by direct injection of methotrexate or potassium chloride into the
gestational sac, under ultrasound guidance (Figure 13.9 A and B).
Figure 13.6: Transvaginal ultrasound of a sagittal plane of the uterus showing a cervical
ectopic pregnancy (arrows). The uterine fundus and cervix are labeled for image orientation.
Figure 13.7: Transvaginal ultrasound in grey scale of a sagittal plane of the uterus showing a
cesarean scar implantation of a gestational sac (arrows). The cervix is labeled for image
orientation.
Figure 13.8: Transvaginal ultrasound in color Doppler of a sagittal plane of the uterus showing
a cesarean scar implantation of a gestational sac (arrows – same as in figure 13.7). Note the
increased vascularity on color Doppler of the gestational sac. The cervix is labeled for image
orientation.
STEP-WISE ULTRASOUND APPROACH TO THE DIAGNOSIS OF ECTOPIC
PREGNANCY
This section describes the step-wise approach to the work-up of a woman presenting with clinical
symptoms suggestive of the presence of an ectopic pregnancy. Before this stepwise approach is
initiated, it is important to note that taking a detailed history and performing a physical
examination are essential components of the care of the woman and thus should be part of the
initial evaluation. A differential diagnosis should then be formulated as new information and
diagnostic tests are being gathered. Table 13.2 lists a typical differential diagnosis for a woman
presenting with lower abdominal pain and vaginal bleeding.
TABLE 13.2
Differential Diagnosis of a Woman Presenting in the Reproductive Age
Group with Lower Abdominal Pain and Vaginal Bleeding
- Normal pregnancy
- Threatened or impending miscarriage
- Ectopic pregnancy
- Symptomatic ovarian mass (hemorrhagic cyst, dermoid, torsion)
- Pelvic inflammatory disease
- Abnormal uterine bleeding
- Gastrointestinal origin
- Urinary origin
Figure 13.9 A and B: Transvaginal ultrasound of a sagittal plane of the uterus showing in (A)
a cesarean scar implantation (arrows). The figure B shows the same cesarean scar
implantation (arrows) two weeks after direct methotrexate injection. Note the significant
resolution.
Obtaining a pregnancy test should be one of the first diagnostic tests to be performed. A negative
pregnancy test practically rules out a live ectopic pregnancy, assuming that the pregnancy test
that is available has sufficient sensitivity to detect human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) levels
commensurate with early pregnancy. A positive pregnancy test establishes pregnancy but does
not indicate the location of the gestational sac, or the viability of the pregnancy. Please note that
chronic ectopic pregnancies may coexist with low HCG levels and are typically associated with
chronic pelvic pain. Figures 13.10 and 13.11 show a chronic ectopic pregnancy with an HCG
level of 22 IU / ml. The patient presented with a pelvic mass and chronic right pelvic pain.
Figure 13.10: Transvaginal ultrasound showing a chronic ectopic pregnancy (arrowsconfirmed on pathology) in a woman who presented with chronic pelvic pain. HCG levels
were 22 IU/ml. A separate ovary was noted (labeled). The uterus (labeled) is seen adjacent to
the chronic ectopic.
Figure 13.11: Transvaginal ultrasound with color Doppler in the same woman as in figure
13.10 showing significant vascularity of the chronic ectopic pregnancy (arrows)
Given that this textbook represents a basic approach to the use of ultrasound in obstetrics and
gynecology, we will not expand on the relationship of the serum HCG level with the sonographic
appearance of the gestational sac in the uterus. Suffice it to say that there is a relationship
between rising HCG levels and normal intrauterine pregnancies. In general, normal pregnancies
will show a doubling of the HCG level every 2-3 days (9). This rule however is not exclusive as
1 in 5 ectopic pregnancies will show this rise in HCG levels (9) and thus HCG levels should not
be used alone in excluding an ectopic pregnancy.
The stepwise ultrasound approach hereby described should be initiated if the pregnancy test is
positive.
This stepwise approach is performed by the transvaginal ultrasound:
Step one:
Assess the endometrial cavity for the presence of a gestational sac:
The presence of a gestational sac in the endometrial cavity (Figure 13.12) practically rules out
an ectopic pregnancy. Note that on very rare occasions, a heterotopic pregnancy can occur (a
concurrent intrauterine and an extrauterine pregnancy) (Figure 13.13) – (Clip 13.1). The
incidence of a heterotopic pregnancy in a natural pregnancy is around 1 in 7000 pregnancies.
Heterotopic pregnancies are more common in pregnancies of assisted reproduction (Figure
13.14).
The gestational sac of a normal pregnancy on ultrasound, which appears between the 4th and the
5th menstrual week, corresponds to the chorionic cavity of the embryo (Figure 13.12). The yolk
sac is the first structure to appear on ultrasound within the gestational sac and is typically first
seen at the 5th menstrual week (Figure 13.15), followed by the amnion between the 5th and the
6th week and the embryo by the 6th menstrual week (Figure 13.16). The normal intrauterine
gestational sac has a distinctive ultrasound appearance, with a thick rim of echogenic tissue
(Figure 13.17). This echogenic rim differentiates the gestational sac from blood or fluid
collection within the endometrial cavity. Blood or fluid collection within the endometrial cavity
is commonly called pseudosac (Figure 13-18 A and B). The term pseudosac is used in relation
to the presence of an ectopic pregnancy. For more discussion on the first trimester, please refer to
chapter 4.
If a gestational sac is seen within the endometrial cavity, complete the ultrasound examination by
evaluating the adnexal regions and the cul-de-sac. Go to step 2, if no gestational sac is seen in the
endometrial cavity.
Figure 13.12: Transvaginal ultrasound of a sagittal plane of the uterus showing a gestational
sac (labeled) at about 5 weeks’ gestation. The presence of an intrauterine gestational sac
practically rules out an ectopic pregnancy with some exceptions. See text for details.
Figure 13.13: Transvaginal ultrasound of a heterotopic pregnancy at 6 week’s gestation. Note
the presence of an intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) and a tubal ectopic pregnancy (labeled) in
the adnexa.
Figure 13.14: Transvaginal ultrasound of a heterotopic pregnancy at 7 week’s gestation. Note
the presence of a triplet intrauterine pregnancy (asterisks - Triplet IUPs) and a tubal ectopic
pregnancy (labeled) in the adnexa. This pregnancy was conceived by assisted reproduction.
Figure 13.15: Transvaginal ultrasound of a sagittal plane of the uterus showing a gestational
sac at 5 weeks’ gestation with a yolk sac (labeled). Note that the yolk sac is the first structure
to appear within the gestational sac and is typically first seen at the 5th menstrual week.
Figure 13.16: Transvaginal ultrasound of a gestational sac at 6 weeks’ gestation showing an
embryo (measured). The yolk sac (not labeled) is seen next to the embryo. CRL = crown rump
length, GA = gestational age and EDD = estimated date of delivery.
Figure 13.17: Transvaginal ultrasound of a sagittal plane of the uterus with a normal
gestational sac (labeled) at 5 weeks’ gestation. Note the echogenic rim surrounding the
gestational sac (dashed circle).
Step Two:
Assess the cul-de-sac for the presence of fluid:
The presence of fluid in the cul-de-sac is an important part of this evaluation as it may suggest
the presence of blood from a ruptured ectopic pregnancy or a ruptured ovarian cyst. The cul-desac can be assessed for fluid or blood on ultrasound by imaging the space posterior to the cervix
and the lower uterine segment in a sagittal plane of the uterus and cervix using the transvaginal
approach (Figure 13.19). Low-velocity color Doppler, if available, can be used to confirm the
absence of vascular flow within the blood clots. It is important to note that the mere presence of
fluid in the cul-de-sac in a patient with a suspected ectopic pregnancy should be concerning for
the possibility of intra-abdominal bleeding and this information should be considered in the
overall management of the patient. If fluid is noted in the cul-de-sac region in significant
quantity, assessing the regions in the upper gutters of the abdomen is important as the presence
of fluid in those locations will confirm that a significant amount of free fluid is present in the
abdomen and pelvis and will raise the suspicion for significant intra-peritoneal bleeding. It is
also important to note that the presence of fluid in the cul-de-sac in small amount is a normal
finding and is part of the normal physiologic changes of the menstrual cycle.
Figure 13.18 A and B: Transvaginal ultrasound of sagittal planes of two uteri (A) and (B) with
endometrial fluid (arrows) in the setting of suspected ectopic pregnancies. The term pseudosac is used
when endometrial fluid is noted in association with an ectopic pregnancy.
Step 3:
Assess the Adnexal Region for the Ectopic Gestational Sac:
The third step in the ultrasound examination of the pelvis includes a thorough evaluation of both
adnexal regions in transverse and sagittal scanning planes. This evaluation should include
assessment of the ovaries and the surrounding anatomic regions, looking for fluid, blood and for
the ectopic gestational sac. The ectopic gestational sac, when present in the adnexal region, is
commonly in the fallopian tube. It is typically round in shape and has an echogenic ring and an
anechoic center (Figure 13.20 A and B). Commonly, the patient’s symptoms correlate with the
location of the ectopic pregnancy in the pelvis but with noted exceptions. It is also important not
to confuse an ectopic gestational sac with a corpus luteum (Figure 13.21), which is commonly
located on the ovary of the same side as the ectopic. Table 13.3 shows differentiating
characteristics of the corpus luteum from the ectopic gestational sac. Figures 13.22 and 13.23
show tubal ectopic pregnancies on ultrasound. Color Doppler is not helpful in the differential
diagnosis given the overlap with corpus luteum flow and the varying degrees of blood flow
patterns in ectopic pregnancies. Figure 13.24 A-C shows varying degrees of blood flow on color
Doppler in three different ectopic pregnancies.
Figure 13.19: Transvaginal ultrasound of a sagittal plane of the uterus in a patient with a
ruptured ectopic pregnancy. Note the presence of free fluid in the cul-de-sac and surrounding
the uterus (asterisks). A blood clot (labeled) is also noted in the cul-de-sac. In this image, the
endometrial thickness is also measured (yellow calipers).
Figure 13.20 A and B: Tubal ectopic pregnancies in A and B (arrows) imaged on transvaginal
ultrasound. Note the echogenic ring and the anechoic center (doughnut-like appearance) in both
ectopic pregnancies. Color Doppler in B shows moderate ectopic sac vascularity. The ovary is seen
(labeled) in A.
Figure 13.21: Transvaginal ultrasound in grey scale and color Doppler of a corpus luteum (arrows)
within the ovary (labeled). See Table 13.3 for differentiating features from an ectopic pregnancy.
TABLE 13.3 Differentiating Features of a Corpus Luteum From an Ectopic Pregnancy
- Corpus luteum is located within the ovary
- Corpus luteum is surrounded by normal ovarian tissue
- Corpus luteum moves with the ovary with manipulation
- Corpus luteum typically does not have a thick echogenic ring
- Color Doppler and pulsed Doppler cannot differentiate between the two entities
Figure 13.22: Transvaginal ultrasound showing a tubal ectopic pregnancy (arrows). Note the
separation of the ectopic sac from the ovary (labeled). The ectopic sac has echogenic borders and an
anechoic center (doughnut-like appearance).
Figure 13.23: Transvaginal ultrasound showing a tubal ectopic pregnancy (arrows). Note the
echogenic thick borders and an anechoic center (doughnut-like appearance). The ovary is
labeled and is typically lateral to the ectopic gestation.
Figure 13.24 A, B, and C: Tubal ectopic pregnancies in A, B and C (arrows) imaged on transvaginal
ultrasound with color Doppler at similar velocity scale and filter set-up. Note the varying degrees of
vascularity between ectopic pregnancies with minimal to absent in A, moderate in B and excessive in C.
Color Doppler is not a helpful differentiating feature of ectopic pregnancy.
The presence of an ectopic gestational sac in the adnexa that is distinctly separate from the ovary
in a woman presenting with symptoms suggestive of an ectopic pregnancy, especially in the
absence of an intra-uterine gestational sac, establishes the diagnosis of an ectopic pregnancy. The
additional presence of fluid in the cul-de-sac confirms the diagnosis. When ultrasound findings
are not diagnostic of ectopic pregnancy, it is important to consider all findings and make a
judgment based upon available information. Given that significant change in the normal
gestation occurs in the first trimester in a short time-frame, a follow-up ultrasound within a short
period of time such as in 3 to 4 days when the woman’s medical condition is stable and
compliance is adequate, may help clarify the diagnosis. If the woman’s condition is unstable,
intervention is warranted irrespective of the ultrasound findings.
A rare presentation of an ectopic pregnancy is the abdominal pregnancy. Abdominal pregnancy
can be associated with significant morbidity, especially if the pregnancy is allowed to grow.
Placental insertion on the bowels or pelvic vasculature can result in significant bleeding if
removal is attempted. If an advanced abdominal pregnancy is encountered, it is prudent to
remove the fetus but keep the placenta in situ to avoid massive bleeding. Figures 13.25 and
13.26 show an abdominal pregnancy at 14 weeks gestation in the right adnexa. The patient
presented with lower abdominal pain. This abdominal ectopic pregnancy was treated with direct
injection of potassium chloride and methotrexate into the gestational sac under transvaginal
ultrasound guidance. No further intervention was needed and the woman’s symptoms improved
immediately following this procedure.
Figure 13.25 A and B: Transvaginal ultrasound of an abdominal ectopic pregnancy at 14
weeks gestation in the right pelvis. Figure 13.25-A shows a sagittal view of the uterus with
pelvic free fluid (asterisks). Figure 13.25-B shows the abdominal pregnancy (arrows) in the
right pelvis.
Figure 13.26: Transvaginal ultrasound of an abdominal ectopic pregnancy at 14 weeks
gestation in the right pelvis (same as in figure 13.25) following direct injection of potassium
chloride and methotrexate. The uterus (labeled) is seen separate from the ectopic pregnancy.
The macerated fetal head is labeled.
CLIP 13.1
References:
1) Nederlof KP, Lawson HW, Saftlas AF, Atrash HK, Finch EL. Ectopic pregnancy
surveillance, United States, 1970–1987. In: CDC Surveillance Summaries. MMWR
1990; 39(no. SS-4):9–17.
2) Ectopic pregnancy – United States, 1990-1992.MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 44:46,
1995.
3) Goyaux N, Leke R, Keita N, Thonneau P. Ectopic pregnancy in African developing
countries. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2003; 82(4):305-12.
4) Pisarka M, Carson SA, Buster JE. Ectopic pregnancy. Lancet 1998;351:1115
5) Breen JL. A 21 year survey of 654 ectopic pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol
1970;106:1004
6) Schwartz RO, Di Pietro DL. Beta-HCG as a diagnostic aid for suspected ectopic
pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1980; 56:197.
7) Unforeseen consequences of the increasing rate of cesarean deliveries: early placenta
accreta and cesarean scar pregnancy. A review. Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A. Am J
Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jul;207(1):14-29
8) The diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of cesarean scar pregnancy. Timor-Tritsch IE,
Monteagudo A, Santos R, Tsymbal T, Pineda G, Arslan AA. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012
Jul;207(1):44.e1-13
9) Discriminatory HCG zone; its use in the sonographic evaluation of ectopic pregnancy.
Kadar N, DeVore G, Romero R. Obstet Gynecol 1981; 58:156-161.
Nhận xét
Đăng nhận xét